Author: White Whale

If Trump can begin bringing forward the many women who have accused Bill Clinton of sexual crimes, and Hillary of threatening them or otherwise marginalizing their stories, then Hillary can’t very well simultaneously claim she is innocent of attacking these women, while attacking them.

Yes, of course the complicit whores (someone always willing to sacrifice the sanctity of mind and body for a price) of the media will support her, but particularly in the debates, Trump can make his case directly to the American people, most of whom are ignorant of virtually this entire segment of the Clinton’s sordid story.

Trump is clearly someone who would have used the phrase “grab him by his balls” often.  Type A’s use this phrase a lot.  To have somebody by the balls is another.

To grab a woman by her pussy is a logical extension of this.  It is a metaphor, not a description of fact.  Nobody ever physically grabs another man by his balls.

Again, there exists ZERO evidence that this man, who has had a high public profile for a very long time, and very large fortune eminently suitable for attacking with lawsuits, has actually engaged in any of the behavior described on the tape.  He has plainly cheated on 2 wives, but he has never hidden this.  Trump is very open as a person. He is gaudy and sometimes tacky, but he is what he is.

There is no Trump body count.  There is no long list of lawsuits, allegations, and charges.  There ARE brags about his prowess, and “locker room” banter, but again, contrast this with the complete absence of such words from Bill, despite his plain guilt.

Again, it is Bill who lied about Monica Lewinsky, about Gennifer Flowers, about Paula Jones.  Those three have been confirmed.  It seems quite reasonable to believe that he lied about Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, and others.  He lies.  Hillary lies.  That is what they do.

If they are willing, and I think revenge is an ample motivation to overcome emotional doubts, I think Trump might do well to bring out Kathleen Willey and Juanita Broaddrick and Gennifer Flowers and Paula Jones, and any others who want to step forward.  He can bring forward and give a spotlight to Bill’s illegitimate son (no DNA test was ever done: a Bush/Clinton connected publication merely falsely asserted it), who for his part likely detests and loathes his biological father.

Most Americans, and specifically most women, do not know these stories.  They have been buried by the press.  They falsely assume that if something is a big deal, it will be 24/7 news on all the major network.  Indeed, most likely gauge the importance of a story by how ubiquitous it is, which is how the media manages to make mountains out of molehills.  They also make molehills of mountains.

It has been unclear what the effect of bringing Bill and Hillary’s many crimes related to women into the light would be, but since Hillary drew first blood, I think it is perfectly reasonable for Trump to go on the attack.

We need to be clear: even though the major issues are immigration, sane foreign policy, sane economic policy, and the integrity of the Constitution (set to be shredded finally under Hillarys’ Supreme Court picks, if we fail), the REALITY is that most Americans are fucking imbeciles, and that specifically the college indoctrinated women are an important demographic, and this issue will not die for them unless it is reframed.
The framing needs to be Hillary’s own personal war on women, starting with her attacks on a 12 year old rape victim, and continued with her defense of her husband despite knowing who he was and is. (I read even now he has a private suite in his Presidential Library in Little Rock, where he likes to invite pretty interns to drink wine and give him foot massages; presumably he can’t get his dick up any more, or he’s on hiatus until Hillary gets elected, under pain of getting his balls cut off).

Here is a definition of enabler, from Wikipedia:

In a negative sense, “enabling” can describe dysfunctional behavior approaches that are intended to help resolve a specific problem but in fact may perpetuate or exacerbate the problem.^[1][2] A common theme of enabling in this latter sense is that third parties take responsibility or blame, or make accommodations for a person’s harmful conduct (often with the best of intentions, or from fear or insecurity which inhibits action). The practical effect is that the person himself or herself does not have to do so, and is shielded from awareness of the harm it may do, and the need or pressure to change. Enabling in this sense is a major environmental cause of addiction.

We need to be clear that Bill was and is a sexual predator.  By all accounts he is extremely charming, and makes the woman feel like the center of the world.  Bill is clearly a narcissist, clinically.  Here is one description of the Idealization phase of a relationship with a narcissist:

From here: https://ladywithatruck.com/the-3-phases-of-a-relationship-with-a-narcisist/ 

During this phase a narcissist is very loving and is on his/ her best behavior. A narcissist can be extremely charming and loving, which often makes a person fall head over heels in love with them or feel they would be crazy to not love them. In the beginning I felt my ex cared for me more than I cared for him but I had never been loved like that in my life and that is very hard to walk away from. I was perfect in his eyes, to quote him, “Don’t ever change, I love you just the way you are.”

Compare that to this account, from here: http://nypost.com/2016/10/02/inside-the-penthouse-shenanigans-at-bill-clintons-presidential-library/

“Bill is always flirting with the women at the library. He knows everybody by their first name and is incredibly kind and generous. When he talks to you, it’s like you are the only person in the world. I always called him Mr. President, naturally, but one day he looked at me with this horny look and said, ‘Call me Bill.’ I sort of knew then that I was in.

Here is the problem: Hillary has facilitated Bill’s attacks on women by not forcing him to stop.  She has, on the contrary, seemingly been the one to threaten them, to cajole them not to talk.  She has made sure that in all but one or two cases (Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky, and perhaps Gennifer Flowers) that there were no consequences to Bill of any kind.  This is enabling, and in this particular iteration of it, this has meant that many, many women have been treated like objects by Bill, used, abused, and cast away.

Bill is not different in principle than the 41 year old man who led a gang rape of the 12 year old.  She made excuses for him, too, and got away with it.  One could, in some respects, view this as a template for her whole career, one built on lies, the destruction of enemies, pervasive vindictiveness, and obsessive careerism and ambition.

And I really think as the main architect of the war in Libya, which has destabilized the region, empowered Islamic Fundamentalists, and caused the deaths of thousands, if not tens of thousands, she should be held accountable.  Here is a one summary from a group I would likely not normally agree with: http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/03/03/libya-how-hillary-clinton-destroyed-a-country/

But it gets worse.  http://www.teaparty.org/hillary-killed-libya-peace-deal-personal-vendetta-claims-whistleblower-190073/

She had a SIGNED DEAL that promised elections, and she nixed it.

If we elect this fucking sociopath, and her narcissistic husband, we deserve all the fucking hell that is coming our way.

I prefer the risk of failure to the certainty of failure.

The risk of failure, at this juncture, was nominating Donald Trump for President.  Obviously, he is hard to predict.  However, he was the only one with the balls to fight the good fight.  Everybody else who eventually developed opinions was following him. (I don’t include Rand Paul in this: but without Trump’s money and fame and instinct for survival he was always going to get sidelined by the same power elite whose attacks Trump has miraculously endured and countered).

Thus, in my estimation everyone else was CERTAIN to let us down.

Trump may yet fail, but he also may yet take this setback and turn it into a massive opportunity.  This opens up a whole new ballgame, because Hillary went there, and Trump is not a pussy, and Bill is actually the predator they are trying to paint Trump as.

It would likely be good for Trump to get a bunch of women to testify as to his character, including his ex-wives, with whom he, in my understanding, maintains good relationships.

This pervert had 21 telephone numbers for Bill Clinton, including the phone number of his assistant.

Then there’s this:

According to court records, Clinton “frequently flew” with Epstein aboard the investor’s private jet from 2002 to 2005, the year news of the police investigation of Epstein was first reported.
During the early stages of that probe, cops surreptitiously collected the trash from in front of Epstein’s Palm Beach home. The refuse included documents with the names of some of his many underage masseuses, as well as an Amazon.com invoice for the purchase of sex slave books like “SlaveCraft: Roadmaps for Erotic Servitude–Principles, Skills and Tools,”“Training with Miss Abernathy: A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owners,” and “SM 101: A Realistic Introduction.”

Here is the deal: if they want to put Trump on trial for being a typical, powerful man–note, I’m not condoning or excusing this, I am simply trying to get someone elected who is not trying to destroy the Constitution actively–then Bill Clinton–who will occupy the White House, whose actions have been tacitly condoned by Hillary, since she has stayed married to him despite knowing full well who is he and what he is capable of–goes on trial too.  What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

And as I said, unlike Clinton, Trump has never been sued for sexual harassment.  There is that 13 year old girl some Leftists like to talk about, but both the criminal complaint and lawsuit have been repeatedly dismissed: http://www.snopes.com/2016/10/03/rape-lawsuit-refiled-against-donald-trump/

Trump does seem to have known Epstein, but he knew everyone.  Bill is the one who was a frequent flier on the jet.

My personal take on Trump is that he has long had an eye for the ladies, but that in reality he was soft, charming, courteous, and kind.  I suspect he underplays this because when dealing with men he likes to be seen as macho.  That is the source of the trash talking heard on that recording.  He just wanted to see Billy Bush’s eyes go wide.  Many women like and have long liked Trump.  Bill is the one who goes around, and has long been reported to go around, grabbing women’s genitals.

I remember reading about how Clinton and Vernon Jordan would regularly go golfing even when Bill was President and talk about pussy.  That is the word they used in the stories back in the 90’s.  It surprised me then.

Here is the deal: Trump has been sued some 4,000 times.  Of those, only TWO were for sexual harassment, and neither involved him personally.  http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/08/02/trump-employees-have-sued-over-sexual-harassment/87969188/

What I think is obvious, but is not obvious, because people have stopped being people, have stopped understanding normal human sentiments, is that on this audio Trump is trying to convince Billy Bush he is one of the coolest guys on Earth. It’s what he does.  He likes being him.

But guys BULLSHIT.  They do.  They do it all the time, ESPECIALLY in locker rooms.   If Trump were wandering around grabbing women’s genitals somebody would have sued him by now.

For his part, Bill has had MANY credible accusations leveled at him (as has Hillary, who as one example threatened Juanita Broaddrick personally).  He settled a sexual harassment lawsuit for $850,000.  He has plainly cheated on Hillary many times with many women.  Shit, he had a child by a crack whore, with whom he engaged in the little known menage a quatre.  Kathleen Willey says he put her hand on his (probably erect) dick, then that she was subjected to threats of violence.  Her tires were slashed.  The list is very long.  I”m quite sure he can’t remember all the women he has fucked.  He has boasted it is over 2,000, according to one of the women.

We are being threatened with nuclear war by Russia over our insane policy in Syria.  We are $20 trillion in debt.  Iran and North Korea are both testing missile delivery systems.

So: soccer moms: suck it up and make a decision based on the issues.  Hillary has failed horribly at foreign policy; her economic polices will destroy our economy; the cross border invasion is creating waves of crime, declining wages, and increasing unemployment.  Her Supreme Court appointments will deliver the final nails in the coffin of our democracy.  In the past eight years we have successively seen the corruption of the IRS, Secret Service, the FBI, the State Department, the Justice Department, and Immigration.  How many more dominoes need to fall before people wake the fuck up and realize we are realistically looking at the end times of our Republic?

When the rule of law is gone, then so is the will of the people, and the reality of an accountable government.  We are there, now.

I am reading increasingly that there is a working partnership between these two families, and if that is true, then why wouldn’t Obama be part of the whole thing too?  Does it not seem obvious there is an elite that act as king-makers?  All the media are owned by people who are in it to make money, and only honesty would keep them from spinning things in their own interest.  Honesty, and the fallout of being perceived as full of shit.  Yet, Fox and CNN are by and large both still spinning the same stories of Trump’s awfulness, and overlooking the countless (I can’t keep track) reasons not to elect Hillary to an office as high as County Dog Catcher (even though she likely does have some experience rounding up Bill.)

It occurred to me that if we posit that our last 3 Presidents have effectively been in cahoots, then we can draw a clear line from the Oklahoma City bombing that happened under Clinton, to 9/11 which happened under Bush.  Both were clearly large conspiracies.

And the specific point I wanted to make was this: credible claims were made by high level Iraqis that Hussein did in fact have many WMD’s up until about 3 months before the war, and that they were smuggled to Syria.  You may or may not remember, but perhaps 6 years ago Israel went into Syria to destroy a nascent nuclear weapons program.

Bush never really talked about these claims, even though it would have gone a long way towards exonerating him from the charge that he lied, and would have reduced the effectiveness of one of the key talking points for Obama, who was viewed favorably in no small measure because of his early opposition to the Iraq War.

Why wouldn’t he want to defend his decisions and reputation?  If we want to go there, because it was Obama’s turn, and it was his job to support him.

One of the merits of Trump in the Primary was his honest claim that he could self fund his campaign.

Well, Donald when are you going to start?  Absentee ballots are already being collected.  The voting has already begun.

I don’t watch TV, but people I know in Ohio and Pennsylvania said all the ads are Hillary’s.  They aren’t seeming to do her much good, but the point is to get and keep a lead, and ads seem to be a good way to do that.  Hopefully the debate will go better too.  And hopefully Hillary’s meds fail badly.

I was actually wondering if it might be possible to smuggle in a flash of some sort, and trigger it to see if Parkinson’s symptoms could be evoked.  Based on all the reports I read, even if she does win, it will take a miracle to get her through four years.  In all likelihood it will be something like the period in Wilson’s second term where it could be honestly claimed he was alive, even if he was not good for anything.  Bill presumably plans on filling her shoes.

I was in the grocery store today looking at somebody with an MLK, Jr. t-shirt that said “it’s always the right time to do the right thing”.  And I thought: she’s going to vote for Hillary.  Millions of Americans who are actually decent people will vote for this awful human being because they lack the imagination and insight to realize their consciousness has been captured and abused by a machine.

It occurs to me that what clinging to pain does is allow us to predict the future.  When you are not pointing your feelings in certain directions, into certain forms, by the pain you allow to continue, then it is impossible to know what you will be feeling in the future.  It is a trackless space.

Pain gives you a place, and a time, and that is as close to a given path as we get in this life.

But life is about getting lost, over and over.  You learn in the lost places.  You can only maintain when you are securely found.

And I was pondering this whole Beginner’s Mind thing.  Neurologically, it is virtually impossible for an adult to approach anything without prior conditioning entering the picture.  But what IS possible is to enter into each moment with curiosity.  Curiosity implies emotional openness.  It is an open searching for anything unknown and new.

As I’m sure I’ve said before, my code has 2 things not to do, and one TO do.  The only affirmative value is “be curious”.  The other two–don’t feel sorry for yourself, don’t quit–support the third.  You just have to hang on until you can spark your latent capacity for seeking out learning and novelty.  That then pulls you through life, and it is much easier.

The essence of Beginners mind is amnesia.

I’m mostly serious but I’m fucking around a little.

Ponder.

No: not like the last time.