Author: White Whale

To point out the obvious, the debate started on the Trump audio, and it ended with most people not even remembering it.  Trump pounded Hillary continually on substantive issues, like the failure of Obamacare, like her breaking law with regard both to HAVING the email server in the first place, and perhaps most egregiously, deleting massive quantities of emails AFTER receiving a subpoena from Congress.

This whole audio has now been framed in a way which makes it impossible for Hillary to attack Trump with it with the effectiveness they otherwise would have had.  He had 4 women in the audience who were all victims of the Clintons.  Every time she opens her mouth about Donald’s talk–I am tempted to call it indiscreet, but he didn’t know he was being recorded–she can’t thereby call herself a supporter of women.  She isn’t.  Kathy Shelton says otherwise, and there is ZERO question about the facts of her case.

(I find it interesting on that that the “fact checkers”–which is to say paid propagandists, whose job is to spin without mostly falling into overt and demonstrable lies–say that a part of the case was that prosecutors “mishandled” evidence.  If you listen to the Hillary tape, she was a key part of that.  She got some expert in getting evidence–in this case blood and semen stained underwear, which would have been damning-declared inadmissable, to get a key piece of evidence ruled inadmissable, using a technicality.  She was every bit the slimy, unethical defense attorney most of us detest.)

According to focus group moderator Frank Luntz, this was a DECISIVE victory for Trump, who came in looking finished, and emerged a winner.  That is what most Americans want in a President.  What the sane among us do NOT want is someone who has demonstrated clear patterns of law breaking, habitual lying, and highly abusive political corruption and de facto bribe taking.

In Leftist mythology everyone who is not an educated, effeminate, affluent, and chronically guilty white person is the Other.  In dealing with all Others but conservatives, the blanket assumption is made that they are homogeneous, absolutely virtuous, and that all their problems stem from interactions with the bad white people.

The truth, of course, is that Others come in all shapes and sizes, beliefs, backgrounds, etc., are highly heterogenous, and quite often create their own problems, then make them worse.

With respect to this election, it occurs to me that as bad as that audio plays in white decadent America, it may well earn Trump RESPECT in black and Hispanic America.  Both cultures are highly sexist, with black culture likely best labeled highly misogynistic.  Certainly, hip hop is.

Trump may well emerge with significantly HIGHER support, especially among black and hispanic men. He is an OG, a playa.

I haven’t seen this phrase yet.  Educated upper middle class white Americans seem to be developing a type of virtue signalling oriented around apologies.  If someone claims “offense”, the offender MUST immediately apologize, or they are labeled non-compliant dissidents (which is to say whatever -ist, plus a couple more thrown in for good measure, is relevant).

This is a form of emotional abuse, because in many cases the “crime” is not recognized as such by the offender.

Both Tim Kaine and Hillary made as much as they could of Trumps refusal to apologize very much.  He did apologize for the “male bullshit” comments, but they wanted so much more.

I think his instincts are good on this.  How often have we seen good candidates like, say, Herman Cain, forced into positions of abject shame by the Apology Police? We accused you, they say, NOW YOU BOW!!!!!

Trump is thinking “fuck these people”.  Yes, of course, there is a role for courtesy to play in all this, but that is not the way this game is played.  They are not asking for common courtesy, and they are SURE AS FUCK not extending it.  They are demanding the right to dictate the rules of engagement, and by doing so, an enormous advantage in the overall social and political dynamic.

You can’t play games by other peoples rules and expect to win.

Trump chose, as I recall, when the subject of apologies came up, to transition to the emails, which was likely good, because it brought the whole server thing up, and he pounded her with it.

But has Hillary apologized to the families of those who fell in Benghazi for calling them liars?  Did she ever apologize to Kathy Shelton or Juanita Broaddrick?  The list of people she owes apologies to is much longer than I care to get into at the moment.  Hell, did she ever apologize to Paula Jones for calling her, as I recall “Trailer trash”?  They were all right there.

If you have one standard for your people, and another for people who are different from you, that is tribalism.  It is not principle based morality.

The most brilliant invention of the West is the notion of universally applicable principles, and particularly that of human rights.  No nation or society before that of modern Europe thought to treat people of differing backgrounds, beliefs, races, and sexes equally as a matter of principle.

The Romans were good about applying law evenly, but Romans had more rights than non-Romans, and slavery was still common.

When the Left goes into paroxysmal spasms about Trump talking about being a stud, they can’t immediately condone Bill for similar but demonstrably worse behavior. I already saw some presumable sensitive man who went to Yale post “what did Broaddrick think was going to happen when she invited Bill to her hotel room”.  Put that comment in the mouth of a conservative and you get the finale of “The Kingsmen”.

And we need to be clear: Bill Clinton has ALREADY been the President of the United States.  For two terms.  You cannot talk about putting Hillary into the White House without talking about putting Bill back in the White House.

And psychologically, it is very appropriate to point to the psychopathology of a relationship built on lies, built on Bill cheating continuously.  I think on some level we all know Hillary is emotionally sick, but just put yourself in her shoes, as a psychologically normal person.  Would you not have divorced him decades ago?  Women, any reading this?  Would you have put up with it?  There was never any question about the fact of it.

Why didn’t she?  Insane ambition.  She has a HUGE desire for her own power, for the ability to boss people around and swear at them with impunity, to make people fear her.  Nothing was going to get in the way of that, and Bill’s peccadillos were obviously just problems to be solved for her.  Trash the bimbos and shut them up was her strategy, and UNTIL TODAY, because of Donald Trump and the courage of some of the women involved, IT WORKED.

But Trump made it impossible to keep all this out of mainstream, kicking and screaming, trying to spin and largely failing, mass media.

That 12 year old girl is now much older, and she had this to say: “I don’t care if Trump said gross things. I care that Hillary Clinton lied, terrorized, & mocked me, defending my rapist.”

http://www.infowars.com/donald-trump-speaks-with-bill-clintons-victims-ahead-of-second-debate/

I want to point out the courage of these women.  They are no doubt private people, who really would prefer not to revisit all this unpleasantness.  Especially Kathy, who until now had avoided media attention.  My best guess is the reason they are doing it is they really, really, really hate both of them, fear them, and want to do everything in their power, even if it scares the shit out of them, to be sure Hillary is not entrusted with power again.  

He spoke the plain and obvious truth.  He fought.  That is what I wanted him to do.  His capacity to buck the tide and get away with it is the reason he has always been my first choice (other than Rand Paul).

Well done, Donald.  Now start running some damn ads.

Trump should offer $1 million to women who have been abused by Bill or Hillary who can provide credible evidence.

I do want to emphasize another idea I had in a previous post: Trump needs to point out that, whatever other failings he may have, he has ZERO history of telling the sorts of big and blatant lies that Hillary and Bill have all their lives.  Bill was impeached for lying.  He lied about Monica Lewinsky, about Paula Jones, about Gennifer Flowers.  Hillary lied under oath to Congress, and would have lied under oath to the FBI if they had PUT her under oath.  She lied about the server, she lied about Benghazi, and she is almost certainly lying about her health now.

It’s crunch time.  If Trump loses this election, the sociopaths in the shadows win.

I am seeing New Agey sorts of emotional gurus defending Hillary against Trump, despite her record of abusing women.  It is not necessary to consider Trump some sort of saint–he obviously isn’t, and has never claimed to be–in order to condemn Hillary’s very sociopathic and violent defenses of Bill over the years.

Is there really any difference between, on the one hand, attacking a 12 year old girl with the claim she was  ASKING to be put in a coma for 5 days and rendered unable to have children, and telling Juanita Broaddrick that, “look me in the eye bitch: we appreciate ALL you do for us.  Do you hear me, you fucking cunt: keep your fucking mouth shut, or it’s over for you and your business.”, which is what Broaddrick plainly heard.  And it worked.  She kept her mouth shut for over 20 years, and was upset and angry when she got dragged against her will into the spotlight in the Paula Jones case.

No.  There is no difference.  And I would point out that in the case of Bill Cosby he too was a man with a lot of influence and connections.  It took a long time for the flocks of women to start appearing and testifying. And the situations were much more ambiguous: they were administered drugs and woke up hazy and unsure exactly what had happened.  Clinton raped at least Broaddrick, but there is no reason at all to assume that was the only case.  There are likely a dozen or more women watching the news in fear, terrified that if they come forward and Hillary wins, they will face retribution.  Remember: Broaddrick testified only when she had no other choice.

Look at Kathleen Willey.  I posted within the past week or two not just her account of threats of violence, her tires being slashed, pets disappearing, but an account of Christopher Hitchens speaking on the topic after having lunch with the guy who runs the dirty tricks campaigns for the Clinton’s, Sidney Blumenthal., who convinced him with his tone and words that Willey was speaking the literal truth.

Who else has faced threats of violence?

And we need to remember the Clinton body count as well.  Snopes says, well, you take any public figure and there are bound to be some unexplained deaths.  Really.  Try it with Trump.  They won’t be able to do it.  Has he had multiple business partners kill themselves prior to cases involving him?

I don’t have time to look at all the cases, but let’s take the case of Mary Mahoney, from this list, which is alphabetical: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.php#axzz4Mc5Qf200.  She and her two colleagues were gunned down “execution style”.  They found a fall guy, but she had bullets in her from two different guns. One guy does not use two different guns.  She was shot five times: “Mary was shot in the chest, her face, and in the back of the head.”

That is vastly more than needed to stop someone.  Neighbors heard nothing, which implies silencers were used.  She had been an intern in the White House, and prosecutors had said someone with the first initial of M was about to testify.  The convicted shooter has recanted his confession, which he says was obtained under coercion.

Then you add the killing of Eric Butera, who was a drug user who said he had overheard people talking about the Starbucks slaying.  He was sent to the house, a crack house, to buy cocaine so the police could execute a search warrant, but he was ambushed and beaten to death by parties unknown.  Who knew he was coming?  Why didn’t they send an actual undercover cop?  The abuse was so blatant, it resulted in a million dollar settlement to his mother.

Snopes, to be clear, does not come CLOSE to resolving the red flags in this case.

And obviously in cases where the person died, no resolution is possible.  One example is Suzanne Coleman, who reportedly died of a gunshot to the back of her head, and who was seven months pregnant.  No autopsy–much less investigation–was done.  Snopes accurately states that no connection could be found between Clinton and her other than that he was her law professor.  But we know Bill is a sex addict, and that professors are often targets of female attention, and that at that stage of his career having a child out of wedlock in Arkansas would have been an enormous political liability.

At root, we have to ask a simple question: based on the histories of Bill and Hillary, is there any evidence of the sort of caring and compassionate personas that would make politically motivated assassinations impossible?  We know Hillary laughed about gaming the system in her rape trial.  We know she laughed about the brutal murder of Gaddafi.  We know NOW that she caused that war as a result of a personal vendetta.

As far as Bill, watch this testimony, and tell me this is a standup guy: https://youtu.be/ClfpG2-1Bv4

Trumps problem is that he always says what’s on his mind.  It is a liability when he speaks too much truth.  But what he has NEVER been accused of is being dishonest.  He brags and boasts, and yes he embroiders the way most of the best sales people do, but he does not tell calculated lies the way the Clintons blatantly do.

https://youtu.be/NvoRcPXURwg

Trump was nominated to be a fighter.  Now is his chance.

In my own view, this is obviously a dangerous time, but the path is open for this whole thing to be turned to an advantage.  The whole discussion can be turned in ways the Clintons will not like and cannot deal effectively with.  They are career criminals and low lifes.  Hillary kicks women when they are already down, and Bill chases every pussy he sees.  He always has, and continues to.  She knows this perfectly well.

Trump needs to stay calm, but to be blunt and on point.  He needs his lines of attack mapped out, and ready.  He needs to have a list of points he needs to make, and rebuttals when Hillary throws back her well rehearsed lies and feigned outrage.

This is an opportunity.  Whether Trump uses it as such will dictate if he wins the Presidency or not. If he is SERIOUS about winning–and he always says he is–then now is the time.