Logically, if the connection of masculine and feminine creates a circle–and one sees this duality in almost all religious and cultural traditions, for the simple reason that women and men are inherently, physically different, morphologically and hormonally and thus socially–then the connection of the masculine and masculine, or feminine and feminine constitutes an undesirable alteration of this dynamic. It is a flat wheel, that turns in strange ways.
For homosexual men, it seems to spark either excessive femininity or excessive masculinity. Most of course are familiar with the former, but less familiar with the fact that the SS was filled with homosexuals, or that the Spartans practiced homosexuality–one might even say pedophilia–or that the group which finally beat the Spartans had as their vanguard some 100-200 pairs of homosexual lovers, who fought harder for one another, defending one another. Some of the best soldiers in world history were homosexuals.
To my point, though, both are anomalies. It is for this reason that homosexuality has often been considered abnormal and wrong. It is also unproductive in terms of creating new life.
There are many ways to live. In the end, I feel we are all asexual spirits, and that in aggreggate sexuality is more of a curse than a blessing for most. There may come a time in our spiritual development where we connect with other spirits in deeply harmonious ways, all of whom–including ourselves–can remember having been both men and women, and all of whom see it doesn’t matter.
For now, though, that is the way I see it.
To be clear, I do not see homosexuality as a sin. I believe they should be offered neither fewer nor more rights than anyone else. With regard to the latter condition, it is my view that their efforts to get homosexual unions granted the status “marriage” is plainly an effort to stigmatize and denigrate religious faith. This means they want MORE rights than they are willing to grant to religious believers. This is wrong.
More importantly, I see the willful cultivation of homosexuality for the political purpose of eradicating difference as a horrible idea, and one concocted by broken and malignant spirits. I have here in mind Keynes and the Bloomsbury Group, but one could certainly add many more, including some Czars within Obama’s administration. The task is not to corrupt a given reality, but to accept what is, and improve it. None of the leftists are doing that. Theirs is a purely destructive activity, and must be stopped.