Propaganda certainly tries to create the agitation, but it is far easily to exploit it. Much of the current media world acts to create stress, social isolation, and confusion. You are told countless times, in countless ways, that you can’t trust the present, that “they” are out to get you. This is the basic message of violence in media, which many studies have found work to increase isolation, distrust of others, and a lower activation threshold for anger and even actual violence.
The goal is to have a primed audience, one which is primed neurologically for amygdala-oriented responses, for fight, flight and shame. All you need to then is insert a simple idea, a simple solution, and a villain who prevents it from happening.
Many of us view it as a mystery why Leftists, once their indoctrination process is complete, as so impossible to reason with, why they actively reject dialogue, even with people they have once considered friends.
This is the solution: once “The Solution” becomes the answer to their anxiety and fear, they are addicted to it. To abandon it is to go back into a territory of fear and anxiety, this time without the simple solution to which they have become accustomed.
Neurologically, they are in an equilibrium based on continual anger, continual fear of public shaming, and a continual need for simple enemies upon whom can be projected all their evil, all their latent hostilities, and all their unconscious fears about who they are, who they have become, and what sort of world they are creating. In fact, the more they unconsciously fear they are fucking everything and everyone up, the more evil Trump and his supporters become.
Watch this process tonight, anywhere you like.
I will add to this that this thought process initiated when I started reading about 5G, at the suggestion of Alex Jones: https://www.electricsense.com/12399/5g-radiation-dangers/
Could we suppose that 1) if stress equals the cessation of rational thought, and that 2) the cessation of rational thought can be equated with those who are currently voting Democrat and that 3) stress is much higher in the cities, could we not posit that 4) Trump’s success equaled lower stress areas, which is to say those areas relatively immune to AgitProp, because they are reasonably happy?
Could we not equally posit that 5G will make AgitProp easier? Yes, I think we could.