Vaccines, to my mind–for reasons I have discussed if anything too much–are neither necessary nor sufficient for a recovery to a condition roughly equal to the freedoms we took for granted as late as January 2020.
Natural immunity is fully sufficient, and in my view it is NECESSARY. I think that is what Sweden has. My reasoning was that lockdowns mess people’s immune systems up in general, and the spike protein injections seem to be specific to each variant; and the more widespread these specific immunities without general immunities are–the more jabs have been dealt out–the more likely more variants become. The more shots you give, the more you need.
As I have said, Luc Montagnier, who is smarter and more knowledgeable than either of us, has been pointing to this likelihood, using both an understanding of the processes involved, and the history of epidemiological science itself, as evidence for the better part of a year.
So the science is not being followed now, any more than it was at the outset. Assuming a base level of competency, then politics, not science, is obviously the dominant factor. Then the question becomes logically: Cui bono? Who benefits from this thing, and who has the money and power and connections to drive rational scientists in irrational anti-scientific directions?
To my mind, we are in the end game of a chess match, at least with regard to the specific tyranny of COVID, although our freedoms globally may well be on the chopping block too. The core goals have been accomplished. The main one was ensuring that the one superpower in the world was not controlled by someone who was not a reliable pawn of a global elite, whose membership in detail I will not try and guess. They are more or less inferable from their influence, like black holes are inferred by their effects on visible things around them. Some of them are likely politicians, but the core elite most likely is not. They BUY politicians, who more or less work as shop foremen for the work they direct them to do. They buy worker bees. Myrmidons. They grade them and give them reviews, and they fire them if they don’t do the work to their satisfaction, and replace them.
So the main goal was getting rid of Donald Trump, whose victory in 2016 was due entirely to their overconfidence in their ability to cheat, and in their rigged polls, which they forgot were rigged. Being psychopaths, they easily assumed they were invincible. They had a 5% swing, and Hillary was ahead in the polls. How could you lose?
Secondary goals including testing the limits of people’s tolerance for tyranny; putting most small business out of business, or putting severe stress on it, such that many could be bought for cheap, as could real estate in some places and much else; stealing a lot of money from the Treasury in the “stimuluses”; and making a lot of money for their pharmaceutical “subsidiaries”.
What they need to avoid, as I have commented, is a public reckoning with the sheer irrationality and pointlessness of the past year of tyrannical overreach, trauma, stress and destruction in many forms.
And as I have commented, their most obvious play is to create the perception that vaccines, and vaccines ALONE, enabled a return to normality. This accomplishes, obviously, the main policy aim of making the past year seem regrettable but necessary, which is a lie; but they also create a template for coerced vaccination, for government control of people’s lives in detail (with one dystopian model being tested in Australia); and of course they stand to make tens or hundreds of billions of dollars.
I personally don’t think the vaccines contain anything but dodgy lab created compounds which may or may not be safe. But at some future point, as technology increases, and COMPLIANCE increases, they may actually have some of the things in them people fear, up to and including agents which effect our cognition and volition directly.
People of good will in positions of influence and power need to SEE what is happening, and need to oppose it. I can’t do much but try and see better than most, and describe what I see, but there are more good people out there than psychopaths. We will not lose if the honest people do their jobs en masse, particularly in an organized mass. But that also requires courage, of the sort this guy displayed, and I am far from confident such courage will prevail. The land of the cowardly cannot long remain the land of the free.