I’m reading George Faludy’s “My Happy Days in Hell”. He has the unique distinction of being the only articulate man I know of who managed to get thrown into gulags by BOTH the Nazis and the Communists. I was told about him by some random guy named Zoltan I met in a pizza place frequented by hard core rock climbers. He was a Romanian/Hungarian/Transylvanian. Which word you used would depend on what part of his life you were looking at. It was an interesting story.
In any event, I wanted to quote a couple passages that just scream (to me) to be shared. The context is Faludy is having conversations in Paris with another Hungarian ex-pat who had done time in jail for being a Communist. Faludy makes a point of his physical ugliness. It is odd how beauty seems deep and ugliness superficial. We all tend to do this, I think.
In any event, here goes:
He explained that he realized he had been driven to the communistic party by his ugliness, his loneliness and his yearning for a family; by the ideology only insofar as he could not exist without some universal ideal that imposes order on the affairs of the world.
“Something that settles the affairs of the world once and for all?”, I asked.
“Once and for all,” Havas said.
Later:
It was not only love that led me into the communist party, but also hate. Not hate against the rich. It is the disorderliness, the haphazardness, the incalculableness of the world that I hate. I have always had an irresistible desire to settle the affairs of the world, outside as well as inside, in my soul. I searched for a direction to follow, for a light that would lead me out of the chaos of my own thoughts and emotions. Because basically I am a religious man, who must believe in something.
Can you see how these sentiments lead obviously to tyranny, and the imposed structures it seems to be able to impose on man and nature?
Can you see why people who feel like this would WANT the Great Reset, where everything and everyone is put in its place, a human plan hatched for the future of the world, and all resistance and alternatives destroyed as viciously as necessary, and certainly thoroughly?
Later, after he admits thinking Faludy must be a communist because he was a devout anti-fascist, Faludy says to him: “He who denies fascism must a priori deny also communism”.
And keep in mind, whenever conversations about Fascism come up, how Mussolini defined it: Everything inside the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.
Obviously, Mussolini created Fascism, so he had the right to define it, and in any event, it is an accurate definition.
Ponder all this. What we are seeing is atavistic. It is very old. As I have commented from time to time, what is seemingly intended is Pharaohonic, without the wisdom and sane philosophy.