I have been saying since 2010 that the conspiracy on 9/11 was MUCH bigger than the 19 (or whatever) hijackers. If Tower 7 was blown, then the logistical demands were enormous, which means that both the funding and skill levels must have been high.
And as I have argued, if it was solely Arab terrorists, then they should have blown the buildings while they were full. They could have killed ten times as many people. Anyone with that level of skill would also have been able to strike again with little trouble.
No: it seems to me this whole thing was theatrical by design, as I have said before. They were just missing one plane, and that fact makes the WHOLE story untenable, because 47 story skyscrapers do not fall at the rate of gravity because burning paper towels and curtains caused the collapse of an anchored I-Beam.
I have not read all the pieces, but two updates I will add: NIST, until the final report, resisted the claim that the building fell at the rate of gravity, because this was impossible in all scenarios other than controlled demolition. In the final version, after have been decisively refuted and utterly unable to claim with a straight face anything else, they simply ignored the blatant and inescapable conclusion of their own finding.
Second, their ENTIRE reconstruction depends upon a key I-beam having been unanchored. They claimed it was unanchored in their final report. Their whole computer modeled collapse (which by the way looked NOTHING like the actual, filmed collapse) starts from that beam. But a FOIA request found that according to THEIR OWN DATA, the data they used for their findings, that beam was in fact secured. So they LIED. That is the word. There is no other word. Why, remains unseen. I prefer the cowardice hypothesis, but it may not be the best one.
Actually, I will add one more thing. The body of a man killed on 9/11 (has it ever occurred to you that this exact date was chosen consciously, to make it as easy to remember, as impactful, as possible?) was recovered, and it showed evidence of having been exposed both to percussive force and extreme heat. In other words, to an explosion. Buildings crashing made you flat, but they don’t expose you to explosions. There were no explosions in those collapses that we were told of.
And this was in either Tower 1 or 2. I will come out and say it: in my view Tower 7 was categorically blown, and in my view the overwhelming certainty is that so too were the other two towers. The case is not as strong, but that is my gut instinct.