I’m always working on slightly better ways to say things. As a youth I would often write down quotes I liked. One was Thoreau’s “it need not be long, but it can take very long to make it short.” That’s close if not exact.
HCQ and Ivermectin are FDA approved drugs. Does this not make them at least equal to the spike protein injections?
As I understand it the FDA does not approve each use of each drug. No separate process happened to allow doctors to prescribe HCQ for Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis, or Ivermectin for scabies. The FDA approves a drug once for a given use, then after that it is up to the discretion of individual medical professionals. This makes the system more flexible, more resilient, and more effective on balance. Their main concern is safety. Having established that, the rest is out of their hands, by law and by long established practice.
And obviously once “out in the wild” each drug can be tested for various uses. There is nothing preventing labs of all sorts from seeing what other value uses exist for any given treatment. But as I understand it, that is not within the FDA’s bailiwick.
Nor is it within that of the NIH or CDC. They have the power to issue recommendations only, not force compliance. It was only with the voluntary (and might I say cravenly complicit) backing of the AMA that they were able to push their anti-scientific agenda on the United States, at least as I understand it.
In principle these spike protein injections could now be used for other purposes than COVID, although it is unlikely there ARE any other uses for them.
We have endured 20 months of lunacy and tyranny precisely because the system was broken from on high and ON PURPOSE. I see no other honest way to look at it.
I ask myself why that specific argument never occurred to me. (Maybe it did, and I’ve forgotten, but I don’t remember typing it much). I think the answer is that it is really hard to think clearly when you are being abused as violently as possible, in words alone, and being called every name under the sun.
They are FDA approved. Approved as safe. This is the same argument the spike protein people are using to defend Pfizer. If it is a sound argument, then the argument for HCQ and Ivermectin is AT LEAST as good, and obviously in the sane, non-clown world, vastly, vastly better.
And I think the best way to describe what these jabs do is teach the body to attack itself. This is not an exaggeration, even though the claim made is that the attack is short lived, not injurious, and provides a salutary benefit.
I don’t think this claim is valid. As I understand it the lipid nanoparticles in these shots act as a delivery mechanism to nearly all the organs in the body. This fact ALONE differentiates these shots from ALL traditional true vaccines, which remain in the shoulder. In traditional vaccination, your immune cells happen on this foreign thing, decide hey this is bad, and replicate defenses to it that DO travel everywhere in the body. But it stays in the shoulder.
So, again, the fact of full body exposure is already a broken link with the history of vaccinations. And with respect to all true vaccines I know of, with the exception of the flu vaccine, these things do not confer immunity. So anyone lumping these things in with smallpox and the measles is being dishonest. Apples and spiders.
Fear makes everyone stupid, and we have been living in fear for some 20 months. Throughout all this I have worked hard not to lose my mind, and I think when we have a better idea what these shots do–and I do think a lot of it will be bad–I think my record will be pretty good in how I called all this stuff. I don’t think anyone listens to me, but this writing is a good outlet for a particular type of anxious energy I continue to wrestle with.