What that insight is, I will not share. That was a journal moment.
This is what I wanted to say: Freud’s work shifted from useful to counterproductive when he transitioned from an effort to elicit FEELINGS, to MEMORIES. Memories you think, but they do not heal. ONLY if they elicit feelings do they heal, but that is not the principle focus of historical psychoanalysis, which is more or less founded on lies Freud had to tell about pedophilia in his time and town.
To be perfectly honest, I don’t understand the details, the transference, counter-transference blah blah blah. I read about them some time ago, but at no point in my life have they made ANY sense. I do know that psychiatrists have managed to erect and maintain the delusion that they are in some respect emotionally wiser and smarter because of their own in depth psychoanalyses. Bullshit. We all know this is bullshit. And bullshit is a useful metaphor because we all instinctively are repulsed by the smell of shit, and bulls drop more of it. The analogy is an obvious one. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and sometimes Freudian psychoanalysis is bullshit.
Here is the thing: I don’t remember most of my childhood. Only bits and pieces here and there. And it doesn’t matter. I don’t and can’t live in the past. What the details are don’t matter. What matters is what my dominant emotions were. Those can be found, contacted, embraced, and released. The rest can be inferred, to the extent I have any need at all to do so for psychological closure.