An essential element of my method is contextualization. People want to proclaim things right or wrong in and of themselves, for example murder and abortion. What I want to do, always, is look at claims in their specifics, and try and determine what is best for all in the long term.
Imperfection is necessarily an aspect of this system. Perhaps paradoxically, I think an intolerance for imperfection drives many people into nihilism. If perfect clarity cannot be achieved in moral claims, they believe, then NO clarity is possible. Yet, this is patently stupid. There IS a difference between a man executed for commiting a brutal murder, and a man executed for being a dissident or heretic. There is a difference between stealing because you are hungry, and stealing because you are simply greedy.