Categories
Uncategorized

Special Counsels

Why would we not put a Sunset provision into the Special Counsel law, such that once authorized , they have to be periodically REauthorized in order to keep working?  We could make the authorizer Congress, or the Attorney General, or perhaps even some anonymous body of citizens convened as something like a jury.  We could require whoever sets loose a Special Council that they provide the means for ending the investigation.  Because what is happening now is ludicrous, by any standard.

Will Robert Mueller still be operating in 2020?  Will he be investigating Trump’s reelection campaign while it happens?  Will he be investigating the campaigns of all Republicans in 2018?  How can we know?  Where do his non-delineated powers end?  When do they end?  Maybe he could still be investigating 10 years from now, 15 years from now.  Maybe he could appoint a replacement, and the research be continued until 2050, or the final death of our Constitutional Republic, which would certainly not last that long in such circumstances.

Categories
Uncategorized

Mueller

Based solely on his decision not to recuse himself, and on the stunts he has thus far pulled in his search for dirt on Trump, what sane person could call Mueller a stand-up guy? Who could say “trust this guy”?

Who, who supports Trump, could blame him for ending this hyperpartisan witch hunt by firing Mueller, and who, who hates Trump, will hate him any less no matter WHAT he does?

Special counsels are not supposed to be a 4th branch of government, and they are not intended to lead de facto coups against people who win elections.

Mueller is a dirtbag. Period. He may have been honest at some point, perhaps even for a long time. But he isn’t now.

Categories
Uncategorized

My periodic plea

Unless I am missing something major, which is getting ready to break, Elmer Fudd needs to go.

Trump was elected on outrage. He was elected because he had the balls to say “because you’d be in jail.”

Yet despite blatant evidence of top down corruption in every major department he heads, virtually NOTHING has been done that I can see. Trump can’t even fire fucking Rosenstein.

I’m baffled. Why can’t we put someone like Ted Cruz or Trey Gowdy in charge of Justice?

All the crimes the IRS, DoJ, FBI, CIA, and State (among others) committed? All the felonies Hillary committed? They are going to get away with them, during the tenure of the one man we thought had the balls to start turning over rocks and shining bright lights on what he found.

Categories
Uncategorized

Culture as addiction

Logically, if dopamine exists to reinforce behaviors, to tell you “this behavior is right, this is what you ought to be doing”, then one primary function of that complex system we call “culture” is providing guidance on what is right and proper, such that this particular neurotransmitter serves to confirm and validate some behaviors, and be conspicuously absent in others.  Guilt, for example, may be a lack of dopamine.  I don’t know.  I don’t know if neuroscientists know.  But it is interesting to speculate.

But in an intact culture, everyone does the same things at the same time, periodically, and this feels good, for most.  You celebrate the festivals, for example.  In Mexico, they have many festivals, so they get regular dopamine releases, simply by existing and participating.

In America, hard work is what many of us were taught to feel right.  This, logically, leads to more getting done, and greater prosperity.  But how much is enough? Your effort relative to your capacity is known only to you, and until the point of exhaustion, more is always possible.

In one sense, it would be possible to view our culture’s freneticism (yes, it is a word, because I say so) as the logical spinning out of control of a basic impulse to validate oneself through effort and concrete accomplishment.

It would seem that you only get a solid dopamine hit when you are quite sure you have done the right thing.  When your biological organism is relaxed and confident that this is a worthwhile behavior.  But if it gets harder and harder to KNOW what is worth doing, in a highly diverse, fractionating, and largely–with internet-ing–solipsistic society, then logically you have to sort of create a culture of one, to find things which make YOU feel better.  Addictions of all sorts would seem to be the obvious and inevitable consequence of cultural breakdown, and indeed that is what we are seeing.  It is not just the availability of hard drugs and internet porn which cause so much addiction: it is the NEED for addiction as a sort of ritual inclusion, in a world where nothing can any longer be said with confidence, when indeed simply saying “Make America Great Again” gets you called all sorts of ridiculous names.  And who is doing the name-calling?  Those whose culture requires them to, with the rejection of genuine difference being the main glue holding them together, and allowing THEM to get their dopamine hits.

All this though leads back to an interesting question: is an intact, healthy culture inherently characterized by what could, on some level, be called an addiction, in the sense of profound behavioral rigidity and following compulsion?  Think of any tribal group, with very clear behavioral norms.  They were the opposite of tolerant.  You either abided by the rules, or you were expelled.  This was the sort of thing I realize, now, because of Alan Bloom, that Rousseau was referencing with his being “forced to be free”. (I would propose as one useful new American ritual requiring all clever schoolchildren to read “The Closing of the American Mind”: he was gay, so that should help).

But of course cultures evolve.  They are not compelled.  You cannot both be free and living in abject terror, and the Terror, and terrors which came about because of his ideas–the Khmer Rouge perhaps most obviously and directly, with their Year One idea–are a logical extension of what he did actually say.

As is obvious, I am a Spiritualist, broadly speaking.  I recognize that our brains affect our behavior, but the overwhelming preponderance of evidence also indicates that our minds are not fully contained in our brains.  This is all a mystery, which I hope one day scientists will study with the seriousness it warrants.

But much spiritual literature talks about being versus doing.  The Tao Te Ching, for example, talks about the virtue of Not Doing.  He obviously doesn’t mean to do nothing, but rather to act with a specific quality of energy, with a certain type of higher engagement.

And I can’t help but wonder if dopamine is related to a lower energy, and getting away from its relentless striving to confine us not a major part of spiritual growth, on a neurophysiological level.

Few thoughts for a Tuesday.

Categories
Uncategorized

Simple question

Is there an equivalent anywhere in the Republican world to “Rules for Radicals”?  If one wants to argue that Karl Rove borrowed from it in 2000, fine.  But did he create it?  And has there not been a widespread rebellion by grassroots Republicans at the acquisition of power without principle?

Where, among Democrats, is there an equivalent to the term RINO?  Where are the people saying “we have abandoned the workers”?  Where are the people saying “we have failed the blacks who voted for us all these years”?

To the extent Democrats are criticized internally, it is for not wanting government control of substantially every last aspect of the lives of Americans, at a national level, forever.

I can’t know what will happen.  None of us can.  But I feel absolute calm that I have chosen ideas–and to the extent I can find them, people–consistent with the ideas I have formed about goodness, the point of life, and the purpose of politics.

I have never seen a Democrat able to claim the same.  They can’t, not if they are honest about their recent past and present.

Categories
Uncategorized

Left wing hypocrisy


https://www.infowars.com/unsafe-to-the-community-facebook-takes-on-pro-trump-diamond-and-silk/

When I speak of Leftism as Cultural Sadeism, what I intend is not that the typical Democrat goes around tearing the wings off of butterflies, or kicking dogs.

What I intend, ultimately, is that they have severed the emotional wellsprings of well-being, of authentic humanness, and authentic relating.  It stems from a sickness, now.  At one time, it was possible to both be a sincere, decent human being, AND to vote Democrat.  Democrats were the party of labor unions, when genuine abuses were happening.

They have never REALLY been the party of blacks, but let’s pretend that at one moment in time–perhaps the late 1960’s–this was possible to believe, because of LBJ and the Kennedys (and despite the disproportionate efforts of Democrats to block civil rights legislation; and while ignoring the original civil rights bill passed in the 1950’s by a Republican Congress and under a Republican President)..

But all that is gone.  There is nothing left but the shrieking.  Their beliefs have fallen into a deep, black hole, and they have pulled half of the Republicans with them.  They do not even ATTEMPT to make policy which is genuinely wise, in aggregate.

What does Facebook have against Diamond and Silk?  Simple: they are 1) black; and 2) unapologetically Pro-Trump, and pro-Republican in general.  This is not the, what?  The NARRATIVE they want to push.

Privileging perception–which is what a narrative is–over reality, is a hallmark of sociopaths.  People who CARE, who genuinely CARE, want solutions, and are willing to look in all directions.  These psychopaths are not looking for solutions.  Politics exists for two purposes: to help them FEEL good, particularly in the context of long term personal viciousness; and to help them LOOK good, in a world where appearances are all that seemingly matters.

Categories
Uncategorized

Fear

Fear is a thousand tentacled monster you can only slay one tentacle at a time.
Categories
Uncategorized

The 1950’s

It is always interesting to me to see the cliche of the 1950’s as static, boring, insincere, and uncreative.  What is never added to the picture is that most of the people in the 1950’s had vivid memories of the 1930’s and 1940’s.  Most of them had seen, and many had been, in bread lines, had grown Victory Gardens, had served in the military, had been in combat, had had family members die.

Nuclear war drills were common, the Korean War was fought in the early part of the decade, and when you factor all this together, the thirst for normality, for calm, for consistency, is absolutely healthy.

But even there, I suspect there was vastly more capacity for diversity of opinion back then than now.  You could not predict a person’s entire political range of opinions based on a couple of question, or so I like to believe.  Nuance remained possible, I like to believe.

What is always unclever is taking any one people, group, time, or place, and assuming everyone behaves identically.  The Left blows a gasket if any white makes generalizations about blacks, but they do it all the time.  They simply make different generalizations.  And they are PROUD of the generalizations they make about both whites and conservatives.

In all times and places where is more going on under the surface that is first apparent.  What I see, under the parade of “diverse” ways of dressing, sexualizing oneself–and actually that is all I can come up with–the Left is dismally, abysmally, distressingly gray, conformitarian, and unoriginal.  As I think I wrote a week or two ago, they ARE what they like to mock.

The 1950’s were not like that at all.  A lot of great books got published then, and many great thinkers were doing some of their best work.

I can’t think of one public intellectual alive today I admire.  No, that’s not true: Thomas Sowell and Paul Johnson.  But they are not as well known as they should be.

Categories
Uncategorized

Perspective

All problems have death in them. It is up to us to find the life in them. And there are some forms of life, some qualities of being, which can ONLY be found in problems, which on that score should equally and accurately be labeled opportunities. A great life is a great set of problems, and a creative and generative interaction with them.

It is interesting to contemplate the vast difference in the quality of the eventual stories which might happen when identicsl events happen to very different people. What is an exciting and life affirming adventure for one person might well be terrifying and traumatizing for another. Something happens, we react, and from there it all goes spinning in countless different directions.

Should proper life schooling not consist in teaching how to generate the former reaction and minimize or avoid the latter?

And in a perfect world, wound we not to still want major fuckups to be possible?

Categories
Uncategorized

Worship

No superior person, and no superior Power needs to be acknowledged as such.  Being is its own reward, and the attention and love of others is a poor substitute for it.  Seeing this is one aspect of being superior.

Worship exists for the worshiper, to help them achieve the humility which alone enables the genuinely new to enter.  Worship says openly there is something better, that there exists a path–perhaps a hidden, seldom trodden path–but a path towards so much more.  And “more” can expand indefinitely, can it not?  You can spend days and years traveling a narrow, dangerous, difficult path, only to one day find it opens onto a completely new world.  Respect for what comes next, though, for the path, is what enables this to happen.  This is worship.

God does not need slaves.  God does not want slaves.  Only humans want that, and then only inferior humans.