This is an email you can send out, if you choose, modified as you see fit. I have omitted a lot of data, but hell in the internet age four pages is already quite long for most people.
This
email is sent out while we are under threat of nuclear attack by North
Korea, and sent with some sense of urgency since such a crisis would
allow all the plans set forth
in here to be activated. It is roughly 4 pages long in Word, but if
you value your freedom, and that of your children, please take some time
to read it. It is carefully considered, and if you grow to share my
convictions, it will frighten you profoundly.
I have proposed multiple courses of action at the end.
email is sent out while we are under threat of nuclear attack by North
Korea, and sent with some sense of urgency since such a crisis would
allow all the plans set forth
in here to be activated. It is roughly 4 pages long in Word, but if
you value your freedom, and that of your children, please take some time
to read it. It is carefully considered, and if you grow to share my
convictions, it will frighten you profoundly.
I have proposed multiple courses of action at the end.
If
you keep up with the news, you will have in the past month or so
learned that the Department of Homeland Security, in particular, and
governmental agencies in general,
have been buying large numbers of bullets and other weaponry. Given
that a large proportion of this is hollow point—which is not used for
anything but shooting people, since it costs much more than regular
ammo, but shoots the same, and is thus not used for
target practice—that has caused some people a lot of concern.
you keep up with the news, you will have in the past month or so
learned that the Department of Homeland Security, in particular, and
governmental agencies in general,
have been buying large numbers of bullets and other weaponry. Given
that a large proportion of this is hollow point—which is not used for
anything but shooting people, since it costs much more than regular
ammo, but shoots the same, and is thus not used for
target practice—that has caused some people a lot of concern.
The
DHS, as one glaring example of what would appear mission overreach,
bought some 2,700 Mine Resistant Armored Personnel carriers, many
directly from the Marine Corps,
which had used them in Iraq for counterinsurgency. These things have
machine guns ports, and cannot easily be breached by small arms.
DHS, as one glaring example of what would appear mission overreach,
bought some 2,700 Mine Resistant Armored Personnel carriers, many
directly from the Marine Corps,
which had used them in Iraq for counterinsurgency. These things have
machine guns ports, and cannot easily be breached by small arms.
What you likely do NOT know is that
according to Army Field Manual 3.39-40, policies have been
developed to detain U.S. civilians charged with no crime, segregate them
by race, belief, or other factors, and keep them for long periods of
time—only releasing them whenever the military or
governing federal agency decides to. Even though these policies apply
on U.S. soil, there is no reference to the Bill of Rights that I have
seen.
according to Army Field Manual 3.39-40, policies have been
developed to detain U.S. civilians charged with no crime, segregate them
by race, belief, or other factors, and keep them for long periods of
time—only releasing them whenever the military or
governing federal agency decides to. Even though these policies apply
on U.S. soil, there is no reference to the Bill of Rights that I have
seen.
The 326 page manual can be read in full here: http://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-InternmentResettlement.pdf
I
will offer up several salient quotes directly from the manual in a
moment, but would offer the general note that if you read through it,
you will see that Internment/Resettlement
operations are more or less operationally conflated; and that the rules
governing procedures in foreign lands are nowhere differentiated in any
degree of detail from operations in the United States, other than by
naming different governing agencies. This
is significant since it EXPLICITLY STATES that I/R, as they normally
call them, can and may need to be conducted in the United States.
will offer up several salient quotes directly from the manual in a
moment, but would offer the general note that if you read through it,
you will see that Internment/Resettlement
operations are more or less operationally conflated; and that the rules
governing procedures in foreign lands are nowhere differentiated in any
degree of detail from operations in the United States, other than by
naming different governing agencies. This
is significant since it EXPLICITLY STATES that I/R, as they normally
call them, can and may need to be conducted in the United States.
Here is one example: “The
handling of DCs [dislocated civilians] is also a mission that may be
performed in support of disaster relief or other emergencies within the
United States or U.S. territories during civil support operations. As
such, local, state and federal agencies are primarily responsible for
handling DCs with the U.S. military in a support
role. When a state of emergency is declared, the state’s national guard
may be called to assist with DCs under the control of the state
governor or they may be federalized and conduct operations as federal
U.S. military forces.” [page 33 of the PDF]
handling of DCs [dislocated civilians] is also a mission that may be
performed in support of disaster relief or other emergencies within the
United States or U.S. territories during civil support operations. As
such, local, state and federal agencies are primarily responsible for
handling DCs with the U.S. military in a support
role. When a state of emergency is declared, the state’s national guard
may be called to assist with DCs under the control of the state
governor or they may be federalized and conduct operations as federal
U.S. military forces.” [page 33 of the PDF]
They go on to state that: “I/R
operations in support of stability operations may become enduring and
assume many of the characteristics of large-scale, maximum security
prison operations that are typically found in the international
civilian sector. Long-term custody and control requirements
are often augmented with structured rehabilitative and reconciliation
programs, increased access to medical treatment, and
visitation opportunities concluding with some form of guarantor or
sponsor-based release or supervised system. These operations are
resource-intensive and should receive a priority commensurate with their
strategic significance.” [page 33 of the PDF as well].
operations in support of stability operations may become enduring and
assume many of the characteristics of large-scale, maximum security
prison operations that are typically found in the international
civilian sector. Long-term custody and control requirements
are often augmented with structured rehabilitative and reconciliation
programs, increased access to medical treatment, and
visitation opportunities concluding with some form of guarantor or
sponsor-based release or supervised system. These operations are
resource-intensive and should receive a priority commensurate with their
strategic significance.” [page 33 of the PDF as well].
We
need to be crystal clear that Internment is being equated with
Resettlement (through the use of “I/R”), and that they have already
determined that Resettlement can be
a function of the military within the United States. Further, they
have mentioned “local, state, and federal agencies”.
need to be crystal clear that Internment is being equated with
Resettlement (through the use of “I/R”), and that they have already
determined that Resettlement can be
a function of the military within the United States. Further, they
have mentioned “local, state, and federal agencies”.
We
also need to note that these things are prisons, and that getting out
requires “some form of guarantor or sponsor-based release”, which follow
“structured rehabilitative
and reconciliation programs”. Does that not sound like a “reeducation”
camp along the lines of the Chinese Communists, and those who followed
the Maoist model? How is it that people dislocated by disaster run ANY
risk of not being let out? Why are we not
planning tent cities, which is the most cost effective response to
disaster?
also need to note that these things are prisons, and that getting out
requires “some form of guarantor or sponsor-based release”, which follow
“structured rehabilitative
and reconciliation programs”. Does that not sound like a “reeducation”
camp along the lines of the Chinese Communists, and those who followed
the Maoist model? How is it that people dislocated by disaster run ANY
risk of not being let out? Why are we not
planning tent cities, which is the most cost effective response to
disaster?
Again, we see that these functions are clearly envisioned happening on U.S. soil: “Civil support
is
the DOD support to U.S. civil authorities for domestic emergencies, and
for designated law enforcement and other activities. Civil support
includes operations that address the
consequences of natural or man-made disasters, accidents, terrorist
attacks and incidents in the U.S. and its territories.
is
the DOD support to U.S. civil authorities for domestic emergencies, and
for designated law enforcement and other activities. Civil support
includes operations that address the
consequences of natural or man-made disasters, accidents, terrorist
attacks and incidents in the U.S. and its territories.
The
I/R tasks performed in support of civil support operations are similar
to those during combat operations, but the techniques and procedures are
modified based on the
special OE associated with operating within U.S. territory and
according to the categories of individuals (primarily DCs) to be housed
in I/R facilities. During long-term I/R operations, state and federal
agencies will operate within and around I/R facilities
within the scope of their capabilities and identified role.
I/R tasks performed in support of civil support operations are similar
to those during combat operations, but the techniques and procedures are
modified based on the
special OE associated with operating within U.S. territory and
according to the categories of individuals (primarily DCs) to be housed
in I/R facilities. During long-term I/R operations, state and federal
agencies will operate within and around I/R facilities
within the scope of their capabilities and identified role.
“Long
term I/R operations”? Read that twice. What it is saying is that the
DoD will be subordinate to “U.S. Civil authorities for domestic
emergencies”. Clearly, the foremost
agency would be the DHS, and what this means, in effect, is that in an
emergency—such as a nuclear attack by North Korea—the
Posse Comitatus Act will be revoked upon declaration of martial law, and the military will then report to the DHS, which is controlled by Obama.
term I/R operations”? Read that twice. What it is saying is that the
DoD will be subordinate to “U.S. Civil authorities for domestic
emergencies”. Clearly, the foremost
agency would be the DHS, and what this means, in effect, is that in an
emergency—such as a nuclear attack by North Korea—the
Posse Comitatus Act will be revoked upon declaration of martial law, and the military will then report to the DHS, which is controlled by Obama.
Here the DHS is invoked specifically:
DCs [again: dislocated civilians] are kept separate from detainees and U.S. military prisoners. DCs are
controlled [my emphasis] to prevent interference with military
operations and to protect them from combat. DCs may also require
assistance during natural or man-made disasters and subsequent
humanitarian-assistance missions. The Department of Homeland
Security, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the Army, and UN High
Commissioner for Refugees, along with their respective support staffs,
are involved in resettlement operations to support and protect DCs.
[page 42]
DCs [again: dislocated civilians] are kept separate from detainees and U.S. military prisoners. DCs are
controlled [my emphasis] to prevent interference with military
operations and to protect them from combat. DCs may also require
assistance during natural or man-made disasters and subsequent
humanitarian-assistance missions. The Department of Homeland
Security, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the Army, and UN High
Commissioner for Refugees, along with their respective support staffs,
are involved in resettlement operations to support and protect DCs.
[page 42]
Again, resettlement functionally equals internment, as used here, and the DHS does it.
Now
watch this video of uniformed national guard units going door to door
with loaded automatic rifles, forcibly disarming and relocating people
who do not want to be relocated
or disarmed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wfp7qBAgGM
watch this video of uniformed national guard units going door to door
with loaded automatic rifles, forcibly disarming and relocating people
who do not want to be relocated
or disarmed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wfp7qBAgGM
Multiply
this by a thousand, and imagine concentration camps at the end of the
line for those who resist. This is not only possible: it seems to be
the plan.
this by a thousand, and imagine concentration camps at the end of the
line for those who resist. This is not only possible: it seems to be
the plan.
It
warrants constant repetition: we know NOTHING about Obama’s life other
than what he has told us, at least until roughly his Harvard years, and
much of what he has told
us may well be a lie. On his own account, though, we know that Frank
Marshall Davis was an important early influence on him in his teenage
years–at a time when he had at that point been abandoned by two fathers
and his mother–and that Davis was a lifelong
Communist. At the risk of stating the obvious, the sine qua non of
being a Communist is a visceral opposition to liberal government, and
Constitutional democracy, and a thirst for the bloodshed of “revolution”
(what the red on the Communist flag symbolizes).
warrants constant repetition: we know NOTHING about Obama’s life other
than what he has told us, at least until roughly his Harvard years, and
much of what he has told
us may well be a lie. On his own account, though, we know that Frank
Marshall Davis was an important early influence on him in his teenage
years–at a time when he had at that point been abandoned by two fathers
and his mother–and that Davis was a lifelong
Communist. At the risk of stating the obvious, the sine qua non of
being a Communist is a visceral opposition to liberal government, and
Constitutional democracy, and a thirst for the bloodshed of “revolution”
(what the red on the Communist flag symbolizes).
Within
this manual is contained a command and control apparatus that, given a
handful of carefully chosen people placed in key positions, would allow
hundreds of thousands
of Americans to be placed in camps they would quickly find were
prisons; it also provides for “rehabilitative” programs that are not
voluntary.
this manual is contained a command and control apparatus that, given a
handful of carefully chosen people placed in key positions, would allow
hundreds of thousands
of Americans to be placed in camps they would quickly find were
prisons; it also provides for “rehabilitative” programs that are not
voluntary.
Now,
obviously there are something over 300 million of us, and it would take
a LOT of these camps to house even a small fraction of us, but we need
to take this thing seriously.
All would-be totalitarians know that most people are sheep, so your
main task is to control the small percentage of the population capable
of independent thought and action.
obviously there are something over 300 million of us, and it would take
a LOT of these camps to house even a small fraction of us, but we need
to take this thing seriously.
All would-be totalitarians know that most people are sheep, so your
main task is to control the small percentage of the population capable
of independent thought and action.
Please
contact your Representatives and ask them to investigate why
contingency plans exist for prison camps for civilian populations in the
United States.
contact your Representatives and ask them to investigate why
contingency plans exist for prison camps for civilian populations in the
United States.
Please also forward this to friends and acquaintances who are in the military or Law Enforcement communities.
This plan will not work if the people involved refuse to obey orders for forced relocation, or for arms confiscation.
And there is a continuum as well between openly disobeying orders
and following them fully. The functional equivalent of a slow-down
strike, or sit-down strike would make it very hard to implement these
plans, so it is important that the people who might
be involved understand that apparently legal orders may have very
malignant intentions behind them.
This plan will not work if the people involved refuse to obey orders for forced relocation, or for arms confiscation.
And there is a continuum as well between openly disobeying orders
and following them fully. The functional equivalent of a slow-down
strike, or sit-down strike would make it very hard to implement these
plans, so it is important that the people who might
be involved understand that apparently legal orders may have very
malignant intentions behind them.
2 replies on “Open letter on Army FM 3.39-40”
I have the actual FM and have read through it concentrating on the areas adressed in this article. I have not found any specific references to US soil facilities. If you read the introduction it is clearly written to apply to operations outside the US. If you wanted to apply this to DHS you could, just as you could with most military FM's. I served 22 years as a soldier and i will still give my life in defense of this country, no matter foreign or domestic enemy. However, i feel this article is inaccurate and references are used to incite fear and paranoia.
This seems clear enough: "The I/R tasks performed in support of civil support operations are similar to those during combat operations, but the techniques and procedures are modified based on the special OE associated with operating within U.S. territory and according to the categories of individuals (primarily DCs) to be housed in I/R facilities. During long-term I/R operations, state and federal agencies will operate within and around I/R facilities within the scope of their capabilities and identified role."
It states U.S. territory, dislocated civilians, and individuals being "housed in I/R facilities."
I will reiterate that the I stands for INTERNMENT, and it is used here; they also mention "long term I/R operations".
Elsewhere in the document it also references getting people's social security numbers during in-processing.
Why would there be a need for the long term internment of U.S. civilians? Why does this plan exist? Why not tent cities?
I cannot conceive of ANY disaster where the long term confinement of Americans would be useful.
The need this fits perfectly is the isolation of political dissidents, and their eradication, or "reeducation" through psychological torture. This is the setup Bill Ayers and his Weathermen dreamed of back in the 1970's.