Page 42 of the PDF (from here: http://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-InternmentResettlement.pdf)
[Displaced civilians] are kept separate from detainees and U.S. military prisoners. DCs
are controlled to prevent interference with military operations and to protect
them from combat. DCs may also require assistance during natural or man-made
disasters and subsequent humanitarian-assistance missions. The Department of
Homeland Security, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the Army, and UN High
Commissioner for Refugees, along with their respective support staffs, are involved
in resettlement operations to support and protect DCs.
And:
The handling of DCs is also a mission that may be
performed in support of disaster relief or other emergencies within the United
States or U.S. territories during civil support operations. As such, local,
state and federal agencies are primarily responsible for handling DCs with the U.S.
military in a support role. When a state of emergency is declared, the state’s
national guard may be called to assist
with DCs under the control of the state governor or they may be federalized and
conduct operations as federal U.S. military forces. . .
I/R operations in support
of stability operations may become enduring and assume many of the characteristics
of large-scale, maximum security prison operations that are typically found in
the international civilian sector. [emphasis mine] Long-term custody and control requirements
are often augmented with structured rehabilitative and reconciliation programs,
increased access to medical treatment, and visitation opportunities concluding
with some form of guarantor or sponsor-based release or supervised system. These
operations are resource-intensive and should receive a priority commensurate
with their strategic significance. [page 33]
Again:
Internment and resettlement operations are
conducted by military police to shelter, sustain, guard, protect, and account
for populations (detainees, U.S. Military prisoners, or dislocated civilians)
as a result of military or civil conflict, natural or man-made disaster, or
facilitate criminal prosecution.
Internment involves the detainment of a group or population that pose
some level of threat to U.S. military operations. Resettlement involves the quartering
of a population or group for their own protection. These operations inherently control the
movement and activities of their specific populations for reasons of security,
safety, or intelligence gathering. I/R
operations require detailed advance planning to provide a safe and secure
environment. U.S. policies dictate that
in addition to U.S. military prisoners, all individuals captured, interned, evacuated,
or held by U.S. armed policy [sic: this may be a later addition, as the
sentence is fragmented between pages] applies from the moment they are under
control of U.S Armed forces until they are released, repatriated, or resettled. Page 14
What we have here is a blueprint for the use of various U.S. forces for the indefinite detainment of civilian populations on US SOIL for their own “protection.”
What if Dennis Rodman carried a hand written letter to Kim Jong-Un ASKING for a nuclear attack on the West Coast? It could have been sealed, and unread by him, carried as a personal favor of Barack Obama. Who would suspect him?
Barack Obama cannot depend to any extent on the personal loyalty of our armed forces, the way, say, Lenin was able to rely on his Bolshevik army, or Hitler his S.A., then Gestapo and SS, until he had full control.
But why not reach out to lunatic foreign leaders? If we go to war, then the Army, and our military generally, will view NORTH KOREA, not Obama, as the principle danger. We have here a well executed, seemingly legal document, formatted in Army prose, which most career soldiers could be counted on to execute, until they realized what the goal was, at which point it would be too late.
Obama does not need the support of senior military leaders, not all of them. All he needs is a few hundred people in key places who use a crisis to implement this plan, and rely on the cooperation of everyone else, who will be as panicked as everyone else.
What if this posturing for war is intended to give a plausible pretext–mass disaster on a scale unseen in American history, and largely human history–to put this plan in action?
If you are not scared, you are stupid. Please share this.
P.S. Watch this video from someone intimately familiar with the minds of the lunatics who Obama has been hanging out with his entire life: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWMIwziGrAQ
A man who has almost certainly eaten at the White House, and who likely wrote both of Obama’s books, wanted to kill 25 million Americans. And he has never apologized for his radicalism, or shown the least bit of remorse for the role he played in condemning millions of South Vietnamese to short, tortured lives.
Simply because this is inconceivable does not mean it is not real. What we need at this point is crystal clarity on the part of our armed forces that they may be on the verge of getting played. As I have said, two rules must be in place: no forcible relocation, no arms confiscation. Period.
History is filled with suffering. 50 million Chinese died preventable deaths within my lifetime. Millions of North Koreans have died preventable deaths within the lifetimes of my children.
All that is necessary for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing.