Without really knowing what true options are open to President Trump to protect our Republic from a de facto invasion by China and others, I will assert that my vote would be to pursue the avenues being recommended by General Flynn, and perhaps Sidney Powell.
It is unclear, but it seems there may be a power struggle between them and Rudy Guiliani and others.
I admire Rudy. He is doing a yeomen job putting all the evidence together, and has worked HARD trying to get it in front of sympathetic legislatures. I hope he succeeds in convincing them to do their fucking jobs and certify Electors that represent the actual will of the people whose interests they supposedly defend and protect.
But signs are not good. The cowardice and corruption seem to be too deep. 50 years ago, I don’t think the people of America would have been deceived for a moment. There would have been screaming and yelling. I like to think there was a less complacent and less stupid time, in any event.
And Rudy Guiliani, perhaps more than anyone else–with the possible exception of President Bush–is associated with 9/11. He has never commented on the evidence that the Towers were brought down by explosives, and specifically the CLEAR and UNDENIABLE evidence that Tower 7 in particular was. He has toed the official line.
Obviously, there are many potential reasons for that, and I am making no claims about his honestly.
But what is needed now is audacity, and Rudy seems tired. He is doing the prosecutorial work he has done ably much of his life, but the courts–Justice, writ large–seem closed for business. I really hope I am wrong, but he seems destined to fail, and to get an Attaboy from the few historians willing to speak even approximate truths.
If there is a larger, more audacious, and perhaps more risky path, that seems to me the one most likely to succeed. Who Dares Wins.
My two cents, spoken from a deep hole of logistical and tactical ignorance.