The point I will underscore, repeated in the body of the response, is To the extent humanity still has problems, substantially ALL
of them can be placed at the feet of Socialists, who like all deceivers
go by many names.
This point is critical, and it is the first time, I think, that I have stated it so clearly.
Let’s simplify this. The question at hand is if it worth passing
economically disruptive regulations and installing in the process a
global government in order to stop something that is not even clearly a
danger.
Is it worth denying developing nations the benefits of
cheap energy? Is it worth raising energy costs across the board in the
United States and other nations, which will hurt the poor the most?
I
don’t believe anyone has shown clearly, much less beyond any reasonable
doubt, that the warming we have seen since the Little Ice Age is
anything but background variation. We have weather on a daily basis,
and climate across decades, centuries, and millenia. There were no coal
plants when CO2 levels were ten times what they are today.
I
don’t believe ANY of the climate models have yet predicted ANYTHING.
Quite the contrary, they make guesses, and simply adjust the models to
predicts in the past what actually happened. This does not inspire
confidence, is absolutely inconsistent with a scientific model based
upon falsifiable hypotheses, and CATEGORICALLY should not be used as the
basis for invasive, disruptive, and costly government interventions.
And
clearly many aspiring Fascists like Al Gore have seized on this issue
as a means of generating global government with few democratic controls.
This is made quite clear in this article: http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.1588/article_detail.asp
Global
Warming is nothing but a repackaging of the old Malthusian notion that
prosperity was going to make all of us poor. It was expressed for a
while in the claim that the Earth was going to get overpopulated. Some
initial Fascist policies were put in place, like forced sterilizations
and abortions, but none of the mass famines that were predicted have
happened.
In the past half century, virtually all mass hunger has
been the result of wars, usually wars involving Communists. To bring
back Mr. Boomtown Rats, the famine in Ethiopia was the result of INSANE
policies initiated at gunpoint by INSANE left wingers, who moved people
from places where they could feed themselves to places where they could
not.
To the extent humanity still has problems, substantially ALL
of them can be placed at the feet of Socialists, who like all deceivers
go by many names.
Global Warming–or Climate Change, which again is a lie–is simply one of those names.
2 replies on “Global Warming”
LA Times doubles down, says it will no longer print letters from anthropogenic climate change deniers:
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-climate-change-letters-20131008,0,871615.story
I guess this is the big-media version of sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "La la la".
My oldest was asked to write a paper on a "controversial topic", and at my suggestion chose Global Warming. Her teacher denied this as a topic, saying it was not controversial.
The extent of the propagandistic hold leftwing media have on the American and world public is astonishing.
To state the obvious, wherever there is a felt need to suppress discussion and even evidence (and there have been many clear-cut cases of data tampering in the AGW cult) you are not dealing any longer with science.
Not ONE of their predictions has come true. We did not have record hurricanes. We did not see runaway warming in the first decade of this century. It seems, on the contrary, that we are cooling. But they just keep saying the same things, and the reason is that it is USEFUL for them to believe in AGW because it creates a pathway both to control of energy, and to global government.