These are posts I made somewhere, four of them. As to the title, fuck it: it’s my blog, I do whatever I want.
It’s worth sharing some facts, facts that should and WOULD be known by all if our media were trying either to report responsibly, or to downplay the risk of COVID.
This disease is less dangerous than a bad flu for all healthy people under 70. It presents almost no risk to children.
You might cite the 600,000 dead figure. Most of those people would be dead today of something else, if they had not contracted COVID. Most of them were old, and most of them died at the average age of death. En masse, obviously most people die around the average age of death.
And this 600,000 is drawn from an overall annual national death “pool” of about 3 million. Given that the standards for labeling something a “COVID death” are non-existent, literally every one of those deaths could in principle have been due to something else entirely–heart disease, stroke, cancer, accident–and still added to the list. People who were not tested for COVID were still put down as “likely”, and “likely” became certainly when added to the list.
People who died of long term ailments, like cancer, were called COVID deaths if any COVID was or seemed to be or was SUSPECTED to be present.
It is almost literally the case that ALL deaths in the past year were presumptively COVID, and only retroactively labeled properly. Hospitals–whose core business was destroyed by people like our governor–got more money for lying.
None of this was or is necessary. Not the masks, not the “vaccines”.
And to be clear, the disease is real, but it is a bad flu which seems to punish Vitamin D deficiency much more than the normal flu. The data supports this claim, and it is much better than it was a year ago, when I was making the same claim.
We have been had. Hoodwinked. I said this in April 2020, and have seen no data to persuade me otherwise. I have known dozens of people who had this thing–I think I’ve had it, although I haven’t been tested, and for me it was no more than a mild inconvenience–and all of them–if they did not even know COVID existed–would have described it on a continuum from allergies, to a longer and worse than normal flu.
Think back to when all this started, to the “two weeks to prevent overflowing hospitals that never overflowed”. Think back to a time before you lost your mind with fear.
It never stopped being relatively safe out there, for most of us. And none of us are going to live forever, but very, very few of us will die of COVID, particularly if we take our Vitamin D, magnesium and zinc.
This is mass lunacy.
While I’m at it, I may as well provide data: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eci.13554
A man who is smarter and vastly better qualified than you–a Professor at Stanford Medical School–has calculated the Infection Fatality Rate at .15%. That means 15 people will die in every 10,000 infections. And as I stated, nearly ALL of them–well over half–will be people over 70 or so, and certainly 60. Almost none of them will be under 40. Their odds get into the millions.
Why didn’t we approve and test the SAFE medicines HCQ and Ivermectin? We know they are safe when given in appropriate doses. We have 30 years of data on Ivermectin, and 65 on HCQ.
In contrast, we have less than a YEAR of data on these spike protein injections. Ask yourself: why are medicines KNOWN to be safe marginalized and denigrated, and medicines we can’t make any definitive claims about made to sound as safe as a cup of tea?
This whole thing is a managed disaster. The whole country has been put on sale. Powerful people are trying to see what they can get away with, and have no doubt been surprised they could get so much from so little.
For most of you, your education was either wasted on your, or it accomplished the intended end of making you dumb, submissive and compliant.
And to be clear, there are three “rates” which are calculated: the Case Fatality Rate, which is the diagnosed cases divided by deaths; the Infection Fatality Rate, which is estimated using serological data (testing random people for antibodies indicating an unknown, symptom free infection), and which is the people infected divided by deaths; and, in my understanding, overall mortality, which is the population divided by the number of deaths.
No informed person uses the Case Fatality Rate to estimate the danger of a disease. Most of us can have this disease and NOT EVEN KNOW IT. Fully a third of us seem to be immune from the outset. Those people will never develop antibodies, so the IFR could be even lower than estimated.
This is lunacy.