What is really indisputable is that Democrats have fought honest audits of the election results tooth and nail. Their argument has been that because there were no problems, the audit is strictly partisan posturing.
Obviously, as usual, they have it exactly backwards. Their deflections with respect to honest and sincere and warranted validations of our system–that it is working as it is supposed to–have been purely political, particularly since all they have done is ASSERT the viewpoint, which favors them, that no fraud happened. How could or would we know, without looking? We can’t. We don’t.
I would put it this way: companies with share holders do not get to skip the annual audit because the CEO SAYS that everything is above board, and that there is nothing to see. No, honest CEO’s welcome the audit since it PROVES that they are above board. They would only fight it, obviously, if they had been lying and cheating and didn’t want to get caught.
I really don’t see any valid counter argument to this. Something like two thirds of Americans think major fraud happened and that it likely affected the outcome. Personally, I think both Senators from Georgia were elected by fraud, and Mark Kelley in Arizona. And there are likely many others, and it’s of course impossible to say how many Representatives; or for that matter how many people put into office an election or two or three ago actually lost and never should have been invited to share in the governance of our nation.
If no investigation is done, then those alleging a cover up are on solid ground, in my view. And given how much cynicism and mistrust with respect to the system is clearly happening, anyone who was GENUINELY public minded would want to put an end to that skepticism by being completely open and cooperative, so that in the end they could say “I TOLD YOU SO”.
But it’s obvious what happened, and why the criminals won’t admit to the crime. The lines of evidence are everywhere, comprehensive, and collectively damning.