Categories
Uncategorized

Democrats are the force of reaction

It occurred to me that in today’s political landscape, Democrats are the ones defending a status quo, which they WILL NOT change for all the tea in China.  They are the ones resisting anything genuinely, qualitatively different.

This is obscured by the fact that they have a new cause daily.  They even have a website called the Daily Cause.

But the Daily Cause is always yesterdays cause.  Your task, as a dutiful Leftist, is always to feel something they want you to feel, and which always has the net result of making Republicans look ugly and mean.  It is usually anger and outrage.  But it may be sadness–oh those poor KIDS–which they induce by removing all context, historical or demographic.

Always you have default emotions of anger and outrage.  This is perennial, continual.

And these are buttressed by nearly all media outlets.  All educational institutions.  Everywhere you look, you see a SYSTEM, one which exists mainly to get a small core of cynics rich and powerful, but which is sold as the norm, as the sole source of reality, as the sole way to be kind and good.

Again, look around you: do you see a power elite which the Democrats OPPOSE?  It’s laughable.  Most of the wealthiest people in America give their money to Democrats.  What Democrats are selling is a system which can be bought, and obviously for anyone with money, that is the ideal.

Republicans are not innocent, but they are naive, they don’t play this game well, and they are clearly not an important part of the racket.

I’m wondering of Kentucky is a trial run for cheating nationally.  We know voting machines can be hacked, then programmed to read anything.  You could reliably win by one vote if you wanted to, but of course the goal is to make it seem close, but not so close that a recount is needed.  In Kentucky, the Governor’s race was decided by just OVER 5,000 votes.  That’s about what I would have picked, if I were doing the programming.

We all need to understand that TRILLIONS of dollars are at stake.  The amount of money on the table is staggering.  It is more than enough to buy ANYONE who is for sale at all.  And for those dollar amounts, people are willing to do, to stoop, to nearly anything.

And it’s worth emphasizing that The System has evolved to the point where our choices are between madness and the alternative, whatever it may be, however it may be constructed.  They are eradicating the lines between normal and insane, between legal and illegal, and between moral and immoral. 

The System exists, at this moment, solely to perpetuate itself, and if and when we let them get full control of elections, it will never be unseated without violence.

I think all States need to audit their elections.  I think they need to recount 10% of the vote for every election, automatically, and obviously using paper ballots which are harder to forge.

To do otherwise is to instill a very healthy mistrust of the system–by which I mean a growing suspicion that there is A System.

Consider this statistic: https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/u-s-has-3-5-million-more-registered-voters-than-live-adults-a-red-flag-for-electoral-fraud/?fbclid=IwAR3JQKAAWktcgBGHd7-WN26HxiXhgwbR48ATuoXOxAyiZ2sqszP7TK8Qm-8

We have more REGISTERED voters than live adults.  3.5 million more.  When you consider that 92 million eligible people sat out the last election, every one of those 92 million is potentially a fraudulent vote.

I think Democrats study voter rolls, and look for people who are unlikely to vote, then vote in their stead, particularly in states that don’t require valid ID.  It is literally still possible, in two thousand fucking nineteen, to “vote early and vote often”.  One would have thought “progress” would have made such a thing impossible.  The technology exists to make it impossible, which would include actually scanning drivers licenses to track them, but for obvious reasons the Democrats particularly oppose any step in that direction.

It is worth asking: how would the history of the past half century have been different, if Democrats didn’t cheat?  For one thing, Nixon almost certainly would have won in 1960.  That alone would have changed a lot, I think.