The purpose of media and reporting, when it comes to complex questions, is not to step way outside its lane and try and determine which is right, but merely to report what is said by whom.
The question is not whether Robert Malone, Luc Montagnier or Byron Bridle are RIGHT, but whether or not they in fact said what they are alleged to have said, and whether or not they do in fact have the qualifications we are told.
If they are qualified, and they are speaking, then they should be granted a platform. Period. Full Stop.
In important respects censorship works to eliminate the free market of ideas, in which the best ideas eventually tend to win out. If the best ideas cannot get to the starting line, if they cannot be heard, then idiocy is the winner. And idiocy has BEEN winning.
ALL OF THIS is absolutely ANTITHETICAL to every principle of Science and the freedom of scientific enquiry which have guided all the material progress of the past 400 years. It is medieval. It is astonishing.
I think the people who speak common sense, then have a horde of screaming banshees descend on them, wonder what fucking planet they are on, and where civilization and respect for dissent vanished to.
Bridle said the other day he no longer recognizes Canada.
I no longer recognize America. Our political discourse has been corrupted for a long time, but never have I seen such open pollution of SCIENTIFIC discourse, which by and large had remained free of political zealotry outside a few (admittedly major, like the premise of Materialistic Monism) domains.