9/11 OBVIOUSLY involved elements of the US government, certainly in the cover up, but almost certainly in the planning and execution.
My logic is this: Tower 7 was unquestionably brought down by explosives.
NIST is competent, but they delivered a farcical and clearly scientifically invalid assessment.
Ergo, pressure was brought, internally, not to do a proper investigation.
Ergo, elements of our government were involved in the cover-up.
And logically, if our government were completely innocent of wrong-doing, why would they want to cover up the FACT that explosives certainly brought down Tower 7, and almost equally certainly Towers 1 and 2?
Tower 7 is easier, because it was not hit by a plane, and because not only does burning office furniture not bring down skyscrapers, they CERTAINLY don’t take 8 hours to do it, much less do it at freefall velocity, and symmetrically. Nothing in your office will burn 8 hours. Look around you. One hour, tops.
But there are huge issues with both Towers 1 and 2. If you want to be informed before you render your next opinion, spend some time here: https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/evidence-overview
That is all prologue. I can’t say with assurance that, say, Dick Cheney had something to do with this.
But it seems certain to me both that some of our intelligence agencies participated in this–the CIA almost certainly, in my view–AND that some of our other intelligence agencies must KNOW this. These people are smart. They are not sheep. They pick up on clues, both small, and, as here, blinking neon pink signs saying “PROBLEM HERE”.
So what gives? How has all discussion and all honest investigation been shut down?
Here is what I propose: there have been many competing narratives created, all of which support the end goals of a core elite, but which vary in their details.
What got me thinking about this was the notion that flitted through my mind while I was doing some bicep curls. You know, Bro-ing it, but without the backwards baseball cap.
Let us say that the architects–some of them–of 9/11 were desperately worried about terrorism, and needed a reason to 1) shut down terrorist training camps in Afghanistan; 2) take actually effective action to prevent Saddam Hussein from acquiring nuclear weapons; and 3) get passed into law the level of surveillance THEY thought they needed to prevent terrorism.
You can see this easily enough, can’t you? A core group, concerned that most Americans were complacent sheep, and unwilling to DO WHAT IT TOOK to prevent terrorism. Such sheep were in marked contrast to the hard and serious men (and a few women) who were CLEAR EYED. It wasn’t just a possibility that we would get hit with nuclear terrorism, but a CERTAINTY if we didn’t do WHAT IT TAKES to prevent it.
3,000 something people died 9/11. A lot less died than could have died, if they had just detonated the buildings right after the planes hit. The death toll could have easily been 10,000 or more. Most of those who died were above where the planes hit, or so I understand.
So you do the math: 3,000 dead (they would have had an estimated range), compared to 250,000 dead if a nuke goes off mid-town Manhattan. It’s ugly math, but serious men and women have to do that sort of thing. It’s the only way.
Does this sound plausible to you? It does to me.
But where are we now? We just handed the Taliban a larger territory then they had, tens or hundreds of billions of dollars worth of weaponry, and spent the last 20 years training them how to fight us. And they have signed a de facto alliance with China.
How does THAT math work? If Dick Cheney WAS the architect, and that WAS his plan, where are we now? How did that make sense?
Yes, Iraq is under control. We have that going for us. But for most people, the connection with terrorism was primarily with Afghanistan.
So not only was all this not worth it, we moved BACKWARDS, after spending trillions of dollars, and depriving thousands of kids of parents, and thousands of parents of their children.
So imagine that the “terrorism” story was just one story within a larger one. What if the REAL power in this world just used that story to manipulate people like Dick Cheney and to a lesser extent George W.?
Here is something really interesting, at least to me: the story on the pipeline in Afghanistan in Wikipedia has been significantly modified from the version I read a couple years ago. It is always interesting to me when stories disappear (as one recent example, the stories discussing Luc Montagnier’s critiques of these jabs recently got “edited” in my DuckDuckGo search engine. Same words “Luc Montagnier COVID”, but everything after May just disappeared. DuckDuckGo may be better than Google, but they are for sale too. There are also SEO processes that I think anyone can do, and certainly that you can pay for).
My memory is not perfect, but it is very good. If something makes an impression on me, it is there more or less indefinitely. I forget a lot too. Most things are not worth remembering. History, however, in general IS. If not dates and specific names, trends and general feelings.
Here is the simple history, as I recall it, which has been ablated: an oil or natural gas pipeline was going to be built across Afghanistan. The Taliban either opposed it or were asking for too much money. The US invaded, construction started again, and it was completed some years ago.
Here is a complicating consideration: that version, which I recall reading, which carries emotional memory with it, is now gone. Can’t find it.
The most obvious reason, the one most people who were not me would go to instantly, is that I am misremembering. This is obviously possible.
A second possibility is that the internet has been reset to include only one version of reality, which is not accurate. Is that technically possible? Of course. Easy. This is of course an unlikely thing, but I will add to the mix the fact that my power was flicked on and off while I was doing my internet search. This hasn’t happened to me ever that I can recall. It’s certainly not common, and the timing is interesting.
We all need to be cognizant of the fact I have pointed out several times that Joe Biden could drop a load of shit on the White House lawn, be filmed and photographed doing it, and the story STILL disappear completely. Gone. Never happened. Conspiracy theory.
Here, though, is yet a third idea: the Taliban were put back in power because the Afghan government was not cooperating properly with this project, called TAPI seemingly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkmenistan%E2%80%93Afghanistan%E2%80%93Pakistan%E2%80%93India_Pipeline
Hell, maybe they got a bonus in advance for pledging full cooperation and diligence, in the form of US weapons and even cash.
Saudi Arabia seems to have played a role, as a nation state, in 9/11. What was their core issue? The threat of Iraq. They invaded Kuwait. No reason not to just keep going the next time, especially if they had nukes. So they manipulated US intelligence fears to achieve their own ends.
Everybody only gets a piece of the picture. Everyone might be saying “Mistakes were made, but either not by us, or not on purpose.”
The image I guess I am trying to convey is of course first and foremost a very complex situation and world. Many competing interests are pursuing their interests in clandestine ways that involve lying. Sometimes the lies of multiple players happen to all serve their agenda, so they cooperate. Sometimes they don’t. Everyone, though, always has an interest in protecting the lie.
Possibly some group exists which, to some larger or lesser extent, knows all the lies, and all the interests, and is itself manipulating THEM for ITS interests, which presumably include at a minimum the creation of a global government they control.
And what I will suggest is that all widely conditioned fears are politically useful and usable. You are training people to be told what to do without asking appropriate questions.
The threat of terrorism enabled all sorts of things which would not have been possible pre-9/11. And it is very possible that the REAL threat of terrorism was never significantly more than the REAL threat of COVID. In the same way Trump haters had to concoct hate crimes, the purveyors of terror fear had to create THEIR OWN terror event. It did involve actual terrorists of the vanilla variety, but as supported by terrorists of the false flag and professional intelligence operative variety.
COVID is of course the new terrorism. It has, in fact, spoiled terrorism for me. It no longer concerns me. My only real concern is my government. THAT I fear, and with considerable reason. Look at what they have done in Australia with NOTHING, abso-fucking-lutely NOTHING. Australia has one of the lowest death rates from COVID in the world. The Flu has to be not just a bigger risk, but a MUCH bigger risk. How is all that even possible?
I will end with a very odd news story I will add some comments to: https://nypost.com/2021/08/24/australian-new-network-broadcasts-satanic-ritual/
Did you see this? Inexplicably, a seeming Satanic ritual shows up on the EVENING NEWS.
Look at the setting: it looks like studio of sorts, doesn’t it? One of those training or meeting rooms with dividers that can be rolled out or pulled back? It LOOKS like a broadcast. It LOOKS more or less literally like the sort of thing a local televangelist might put out on public access on a Sunday.
Was this broadcast being created at that TV station? Was it streaming during the newscast, such that the person switching from the live report back the anchor hit the wrong button momentarily? That seems the likeliest explanation.
That, then, would logically imply that Satanism is sufficiently advanced in that area that it can be practiced within a normal television studio, and that there is enough outside interest that a broadcast makes sense.
In my own view, demons exist. I have seen them many times. We are all interconnected. Everything is interconnected. So no doubt some of what I have seen was connecting with and resonating with energies within me that were primal and awful. That is what I am processing. That is what trauma looks like. It is chaotic, highly charged, and impossible to integrate with rational thought.
So are the lockdowns in Australia just an act of mass sadism, and perhaps even literal Satanism? They are IRRATIONAL. They are not a policy response in proportion to the danger, and obviously will fuck a lot of people’s minds up even more. They make no sense, from a scientific or moral perspective.