Category: Uncategorized

Medically, if we can call these spike protein injections “safe”, without having done several years of needed work–and done it HONESTLY, which seemingly has not really started even now–then why can’t the same medical professional who have learned to stop blushing when they say the “vaccines are perfectly safe–Nothing to see here– Safety as far as the eye can see” ALSO say that taking 4,000 iu Vitamin D with 300 mg of magnesium a day is safe?  And maybe 25 mg of zinc, more in an acute illness?

Medically, the cherry has been popped.  They have gone fully into an uncharted realm of medical ethics, in which I really don’t think there ARE any ethics.  They are saying things they can’t defend in depth, for reasons which appear purely venal and political.  Science has nothing to do with almost ANY of this bullshit.

BTW: Sweden reported ZERO new COVID cases today.  Not relevant or anything, but thought I’d mention it.

So why not?  And add Quercetin and Vitamin C, and hell, as an added bonus for those who are paranoid, Curcumin and Nigella Sativa? These things are harmless in normal doses, and helpful for a LOT of things.

You have to wonder: in the same way accountants fear a flat tax, are there people–doctors, pharmacists, cold medicine manufacturers, and of course Big Pharma–who fear a precipitous decrease in ALL infectious illness?

There is beauty in this world, but there is plenty of ugliness to appreciate it in contrast to.

As I understand the matter, the “vaccines”–which I am calling Spike Protein Injections, since in effect that is what they are, with the spike proteins apparently (in a Japanese study) entering nearly every organ of the body, including the brain, ovaries and bone marrow–are targeted to specific variants of COVID.

What is being rolled out now is the Alpha vaccines.  Those work, in theory, with the disease as it existed a year ago.  But they don’t work with evolved/changed varieties of the disease.  It is virtually a lock and key system, where if the lock changes more than a little, you need a new key.

Israel recently reported 80% of their hospitalizations had been vaccinated.  They also found natural immunity, from having had the disease, was 5-13x more effective than “vaccination” in preventing hospitalization.

In a little local story I don’t remember if I shared here, a guy who works for me on occasion has a female friend who is pregnant and who doesn’t trust the shots–since they seemingly have caused MANY miscarriages.  So she has to get tested weekly for her employer.

The gal who does the tests, and who has done nothing else for the past year, said that nearly every positive she was getting was among “vaccinated” people.

This makes perfect sense.  The people who obeyed our government and who have trusted our “public health” “experts” didn’t get COVID.  They stayed home, and then got the shots.

This means their only natural immunity to COVID specifically comes from the shot, and if the shot is highly specific, they are vulnerable to the “Delta” variant, and presumably the Mu variant they are organizing their next propaganda push around.

Every variant will require a new shot.  That is my understanding, and it squares with the data I have.

As I have shared Luc Montagnier, the Nobel Laureate who isolated the HIV virus, has been saying that this basic template is bound to drive nearly infinite diversification of the virus.

Now, as I understand it, it is POSSIBLE that the virus could take a more lethal turn, but that in general viral evolution tends towards being more contagious and less lethal.  That is a vastly larger field on which to grow its children, and enables vastly more time to do it.

But if we need a new vaccine for every variant of the virus our arms are going to get sore from all the shots.  Let us call the original COVID the Red virus.  Well, you may need a Yellow vaccine in two months, and an Orange one six months after that, and a Burnt Orange one three months after that.

It’s really small wonder Big Pharma has a hard-on for all this, and small wonder they have seemingly invested so much time and money convincing people things that WORK–like Vitamin D, Zinc, HCQ, Ivermectin, Quercetin, and seemingly Artemesisin–should either 1) not be talked about; or 2) denigrated and marginalized and mocked.

Do you really want to live in that world?  It’s the world of twice annual flu shots.

And ponder flu shots, even.  A good case can be made that the “flu season” is really the “Vitamin D deficiency” season.  Most flu shots could be made superfluous with Vitamin D supplementation (with magnesium, ideally, to help with calcium regulation).  Most infectious diseases could be decreased in size and amplitude by widespread D and Zinc supplementation.

I was looking in my Cold and Flu aisle the other day.  They have nothing that has D, Zinc and C in it.  Not that I saw.

I bought some packages that had been invented by doctors frustrated by the overuse of antibiotics at my local grocer a year ago, but they were in the process of being discontinued.  Now, I see nothing that has everything I would want.

Developing pills that would prevent most infectious diseases among normally healthy people would not be hard.  But LARGE monied interests are pushing hard against it.  I could easily see Big Pharma itself buying that shelf space at my grocers and replacing it with something inferior.

And to reiterate the obvious, these spike protein injections may wreak all sorts of havoc with our various body systems over time.  We don’t know.  I don’t know how anyone could be sure this early in, unless they are sure they DO cause major damage.  Safety, always, is a question of waiting to see what happens.  It takes time for nothing to mean something.

I was just sitting down to meditate, and it occurred to me that the 2015 Nobel Prize was shared 3 ways.  2 men shared half the Prize for inventing/developing Ivermectin, and the third, a Chinese Woman named Tu Youyou, got half for inventing/developing an anti-malarial called Artemesinin, using an extract from a traditional Chinese medicinal herb.

I thought: shit, HCQ is an anti-malarial and it works.  She’s already there with the Ivermectin guys.  I wonder if anyone has tried her medicine.

And yes, they have: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33152450/

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210719/Study-proves-effectiveness-of-Artemisia-annua-against-SARS-CoV-2-in-vitro.aspx

https://research.med.uky.edu/news/artemisia-annua-could-be-promising-treatment-covid-19

Maybe that is what China is REALLY using.

Put on your John Lennon glasses and try and IMAGINE what the world would look like right now if SCIENCE had run the show from the outset of all this.  It’s a difficult thing.  It’s probably easier to imagine world peace than a competent, honest, caring and data driven response to COVID, but try.  I wonder if you can.

And what else are we missing?  I don’t even see Artemesinin on this list, and yet I just found 3 good studies in ten seconds of looking: https://c19early.com/

Oi.  Looking at all this makes me woozy.  It is hard to decide which is larger: the crimes themselves, or the stupidity and cowardice which have made them possible.

My GOVERNOR referred to Ivermectin as “horse medicine”.  This whole thing is beyond ludicrous.

Ivermectin treats “elephantiasis”, which threatens nearly a billion people: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elephantiasis

Here is the WHO website, where it is on the list of protocols: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lymphatic-filariasis

WHO now recommends the following MDA regimen in countries without onchocerciasis:

• ivermectin (200 mcg/kg) together with diethylcarbamazine citrate (DEC) (6 mg/kg) and albendazole (400 mg) in certain settings

It also treats “river blindness”, which affects about 15 million people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onchocerciasis

OK, the original post is below, but I almost never repeat anything verbatim, and am always amending, appending and updating.  The bits above are interesting.

“A number of serious infectious diseases are caused by parasites spread by insects. River blindness is caused by a tiny worm that can infect the cornea and cause blindness. Lymphatic filariasis, or elephantiasis, is also caused by a worm and produces chronic swelling. Satoshi Omura cultured bacteria, which produce substances that inhibit the growth of other microorganisms. In 1978 he succeeded in culturing a strain from which William Campbell purified a substance, avermectin, which in a chemically modified form, ivermectin, proved effective against river blindness and elephantiasis.”

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2015/summary/

Hey Australia and New Zealand, in particular, ponder this a bit.  This is your policy in short:

As a general rule, I avoid this topic, as it evokes strong emotions on both sides, and–here is a principle that just occurred to me–YOU CAN’T DEBATE EMOTIONS.

What a topic like this needs, and would much benefit from, is emotional intelligence.  It would benefit from both sides relating empathetically to the other, recognizing that both sides have valid points.

Personally, I think most European nations have a reasonably good balance.  As I understand it, most of them have legal abortion up to 15 weeks or so, and it is illegal for doctors to perform it after that.

What has happened in this country is that one side is utterly convinced that life starts at conception, and that the rest of us have a moral duty to protect that life from murder from that moment forward.

The other side, reacting to this view, has gradually evolved into justifying infanticide, in all senses of the word.  As I have commented from time to time, Obama voted, in the Illinois Senate, against a law (which was passed, by the way, if memory serves), which made illegal the practice of putting viable babies who were born but unwanted in cold rooms until they died, and calling that “abortion”.

At the root of all this is really the understanding of what it means to be human, and–to use one sides recurring phrase–the value of human life.

Personally, I think killing what are for all intents and purposes intact, viable, human beings–infanticide–has to be morally and thus legally wrong.  A baby does not become a human being simply because it is wanted, or stop being a human being because–for some inexplicable reason–the mother chose until the last possible second to kill it.

At the same time, women do get pregnant unintentionally, and sometimes as a result of violent actions, including rape and incest.  Some legal provision needs to be made for them not to give birth to children they don’t want.

So to my mind, there is a large gray area, which amounts to how many weeks a woman can carry a child and still legally rid herself of it.

Obviously, the answer to “my body, my choice” is that the baby is not her body.  The baby is a living human being, who will most likely live much longer than its mother, making its own decisions and living its own life.

But PRACTICALLY we have to accept human reality, so again it defaults to the number of weeks.  In my own subjective view, 6 weeks is too early.  As someone pointed out, that is only one missed period, so it is possible for the woman not even to know she is pregnant.

But a heartbeat is a heartbeat.

There is no scientific answer to this, so the whole thing SHOULD in my view be debated and discussed in a morally and emotionally intelligent way.  The fact that this is impossible is the reason States like Texas just say “fuck it” because they can, and because they cannot expect ANY compromise on the part of the other side.  When you draw a hard line, then if the other side gets power, you get nothing.

And to point out the painfully obvious, the Bill of Rights CLEARLY does not protect abortion.  Roe v. Wade was absolutely indefensible legally and Constitutionally.  That much is in my view really not debatable.

The core legal argument originated in the 4th Amendment, then invoked the 14th or 15th Amendment for its generalization.

Here is the text of the 4th Amendment.  If you can find a right to abortion in it, you have miraculous powers that have been denied to me:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

I was going to work today, but decided to stay home and watch the rain.  I’ve structured my life in such a way that that sort of thing is not difficult.

What follows will most likely be a bit of a stream of consciousness.  Do with it what you will.

I was looking at trees reflected in the rainwater on the street, and realized that the reflection extends a considerable amount in both directions.  The “reflection” depends entirely on where you are standing, and it might make an interesting art project to photograph a reflection from a hundred slightly different angles and compile them.  It has likely been done, but that may be an idea for someone.

Then it occurred to me that a shadow is really the emergent property of light interacting with something solid.  Psychically, this would be something relative fixed, “solid”, unmoving, unflowing within us. We dissolve shadows through flow, through acceptance, through presence, through allowing.

Then I got to thinking again what it would be like to KNOW we are infinite.  Imagine beings who mostly exist in another dimension, but who once had lives and physical extent on some planet far away.

Imagine KNOWING you are going to live forever.  What do you do?  Would not amnesia perhaps be one of the first things you invent?  I don’t know what it is like to live in bliss, which many mystics tell us is the true nature of Reality–Sat in Sanskrit–but perhaps as an individual, as a discrete particle of an emanating God, various ideas occur, one of which might be to have all sorts of experiences.

Doris Lessing, in her book Shikasta, describes and Earth which is populated by happy humans directed in various ways by benevolent aliens who mainly exist in another dimension, who have mastered the spiritual arts.  At a certain point it all crashes down.  In the narrative, as I recall it (and I read this book 30 years ago and probably need to reread it), the alignment of stars change in such a way that the world is broken, which is the meaning of “Shikasta” in the text.  A malevolent alien species achieves relative dominance, and pushes everything and everyone towards conflict and pain.

Here is an idea: what if the benevolent aliens ALLOWED this to happen, just to see how it all plays out?  As in infinite being, short term pain–which can’t last on this Earth more than 100 years or so at most–is not a large problem.

What if the Earth exists as a place INTENDED on some level as a sort of Purgatory, not as punishment, but for interesting and diverse experiences?  What does it feel like to torture someone?  To be tortured?  This is a place where everything is possible, but time delimited.  It all ends, and from a perspective of millions of years, in the blink of an eye.

What if being human is, to an infinite being, much like taking a hallucinogenic drug?  You identify fully with the experience, you inhabit it, but then it ends?

My own views are tending somewhat in this direction.  Fully a hundred years ago (and a bit more) William James proposed that our physical brains are a sort of radio, which receives transmissions from elsewhere.  If you get brain damage, the radio is damaged, but the signal remains intact we don’t really know where, or how, or what that means.  But it helped him explain both his own considerable knowledge about medicine and the behavioral and perceptual effects of neurological damage and his experiences with mediums who were doing things he could not explain either as fraud, or using any of the conventional cognitive tools of reductive materialistic science.

Our advances in physical science have made us arrogant in many ways.  We are like children playing with dangerous toys we don’t really understand, not least because we do not understand ourselves, and what we really are.

Nothing in our physics prevents any of this.  As Werner Heisenberg–who was much smarter than just about anyone who COULD be reading this–commented “The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.”

There are some more very good quotes here: http://lightoftruth.in/column/heisenberg-god-bottom-glass/

One more: “Where no guiding ideals are left to point the way, the scale of values disappears and with it the meaning of our deeds and sufferings, and at the end can lie only negation and despair. Religion is therefore the foundation of ethics, and ethics the presupposition of life.”

I would comment that I might not use the word “religion”, but truly advanced HUMAN science, which understands our deep reality, and the nature of human embodiment and places [sic] in the universe.

As horrific as the Orwellian darkness is that has fallen on Australia–where we are seeing Orwell updated to modern technology, which makes everything vastly worse, and which would easily have prevented Winston Smith from ever meeting his woman ONCE–I think it important to point out this may just be a TRIAL.  This may be something the people running this pandemic–and somebody plainly is–want rolled out globally.

You might reasonably say “that’s impossible”.  But how is it happening NOW, today, at this moment, in Australia?  How is the COVID tyranny happening AT ALL?  It kills maybe 1 or 2 people in a thousand, a third of us seem to have natural immunity, natural immunity plainly works better than highly targeted spike protein injections, and we know how to reduce mortality with vitamin and mineral supplementation.

And with regard to Ivermectin specifically, I will make several points.

One, it is completely safe.  We KNOW this from 30 years of use, with many billions of doses given in the developing world and everywhere the water is not clean.  It is an anti-parasitic that was developed for animals but repurposed for humans, and in widespread use in the poor world for  “head lice, scabies, river blindness (onchocerciasis), strongyloidiasis, trichuriasis, ascariasis, and lymphatic filariasis.”

These are not common illnesses in the rich world, so most people here have never taken it for anything.  But it is SAFE, and we have 30 years of data to this effect.

It can perhaps be stated honestly that it is not PROVEN to help with COVID, but over 60 studies say it does, averaging a 72% reduction in death: https://c19ivermectin.com/

And off-label use in medicines is common.  You have perhaps heard of Hydroxychloroquine?  Well, it is more or less high tech Quinine, of the sort still added to Tonic Water, and highly effective in preventing malaria.  But in the UNITED STATES it is mainly prescribed for lupus and arthritis.  Off label.

Why does it work for Lupus and arthritis?  We probably have good guesses, but we probably don’t really know.  In SCIENCE, of the real sort, patterns of correlation are often noticed first, and only afterwards explained.  It didn’t matter WHY penicillin–which was discovered more or less by accident–worked.  It was sufficient that it DID.

So to say Ivermectin is dangerous is a lie, and to pretend medicines are not continually and routinely prescribed off label is also a lie.

WE CURRENTLY HAVE NO GOOD EARLY TREATMENT PROTOCOLS FOR COVID.  If you get infected. or get exposed, in pretty much all of the rich world nothing will happen until you get bad enough to wind up in the hospital.

So we have something 1) Safe; and 2) LIKELY effective when given early.  So why is Australia going full Oceania?

And there is more: Ivermectin is on the WHO’s list of “Essential Medicines”, AND the 2015 Nobel Prize went in part to the Japanese scientist who DISCOVERED IVERMECTIN: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2015/omura/facts/

Look around you.  You NEED a conspiracy theory to explain all this.  Ivermectin is not “horse medicine”.  What has happened is that Big Pharma–and presumably the REAL ring leaders of all this–have talked the governments of the rich world into banning it, so desperate people, who don’t trust a medical system WHICH HAS NO TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR EARLY STAGE COVID of any demonstrated efficacy, are buying the veterinary versions.  GOVERNMENT CREATED THIS PROBLEM.

And here is the kicker: in the United States at least, all these spike protein injections would be ILLEGAL if it were admitted that Ivermectin works.  Keeping it marginalized is worth literally hundreds of billions of dollars to the spike protein injection manufacturers.

WE ARE BEING LIED TO.  Who is behind it all?  Take your pick.  Lots of psychopaths out there.

But consider this: if COVID does what Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier is claiming it may then we may be breeding a superbug, which actually IS dangerous.  Look at what has been done using a very, very low amount of death in Australia.  That  could easily be done here with something truly dangerous.

And the people running this thing, if they don’t get the outcome they seemingly want out of Antibody Dependent Enhancement, COULD RELEASE ANOTHER VIRUS.

As I keep saying, none of this should be possible.  The science isn’t there.  Smart people KNOW BETTER.  Trained scientists should be looking at all this and screaming BULLSHIT.

But it is happening.  That means much worse is possible.

is grief.  Sadness.  And sadness, being a human emotion, is something I can deal with.  It is a welcome relief.

As I think about it, I think I posted something like this a few months ago.  I go in cycles.  Circles.  But the loops are getting larger, and the motion is slowly moving upwards.

I realized yesterday I have stopped shaking at night.  This is a huge advance for me.

And I can have two beers at a bar then go home and sleep.  This is a new development.  Historically, I always picked up a six pack on the way home and drank it.  Or two bottles of wine: one Cabernet, and a bottle of Port.  And yes, I would drink all of both.  I have a very robust constitution, and I don’t get hangovers.  I get fuzzy the next day, though, as you may imagine.

And I am realizing alcohol is like a friend I used to need to see often, to comfort me, but who is feeling more distant now.

These are all strongly positive developments that have taken a LOT of work.  I can say with reasonable confidence very, very few people would have been willing to go through what I have gone through just to get this far.

Most often, I see people speculate about the immense possibilities alien technology might open to us.  Infinite power.  The ability to travel between stars.

But it has ALWAYS seemed to me that more technology is not really our most pressing issue.  We have the ability NOW to provide for every human being on the planet.  We have the technology NOW to create comfort and security for every human being on the planet.

What is of vastly more interest to me is the CULTURE of alien civilizations: their “religion”, if advanced races have such a thing, and more important how they have made peace among themselves, how they have integrated their technology into their lives, if they have done it harmoniously.

Better CULTURAL ideas are what we really need.

After putting it off for many years, I have finally started reading Tarthang Tulku’s first major book in English, “Time, Space and Knowledge.”

He writes this in the Preface:

The emphasis on reaching an understanding of reality and solving material problems through science and technology has had such impressive and useful results that most of the world has started to follow suit.  But in doing so, many cultures are now abandoning their heritages–although these latter often include insights which are necessary for a balanced perspective in living, and even necessary for the success of the scientific solutions to life’s problems.  The highly developed industrial nations have led the world in adopting this path (to the exclusion of other approaches); we should now consciously consider our responsibilities to restore a balance, an integration of material advances with the deeper values of humanity.  And when there is a balance of the two ways of thinking, technology can be utilized as a very valuable and creative force.

To my mind, most of the morality in the world–I can’t even really use the word spirituality, since where the word still exists it often feels shallow and weak to me–is in effect a different level of Consumerism, which is what most Americans, in any event, view as the TRULY sacred.

The dominant cultural conflict in our country at present is between Christians (and Jews and Muslims, and other people of faith and tradition), and people who have bought into a prefabricated, artificial, plastic mode of being and emoting.  If you join what I have often called the cult, you get–you are empowered to consume–simple ideas of moral superiority, and superficial social belonging.

But what might be called Thing-ness, as a synonym for Consumerism, is a very, very weak basis for a social order.  It teaches that everything should be easy, even morality, even spirituality.  The fact that this is not true is responsible for most of the frustration, depression, anxiety, anger and conflict in our present era.

It is easy to generalize the Amazon ethos to life in general.  All problems are supposed to be simple.  People are supposed to be simple.  Point and click and you get a complete worldview, with everything you need.

Is it not accurate to say that viewing people in categories is really just a form of laziness?  Is it not a direct result of the belief that life is supposed to be easy, and everything provided with very little effort?

There is no shortage of solid spiritual work out there, no shortage of deep, insightful thinkers who have much that is useful and practical. There are many books out there–obviously I am a partisan of Tarthang Tulku’s work, but he not the only smart one out there providing solid and wise templates–upon which we could easily base a much better civilization. What is lacking is people who feel the lack sufficiently to step back from their lives and do something HARD, that take daily work across many years.

I was watching a retrospective on Esalen a few years ago, and the old-timers, the old hippies, said that what really made a difference for them was meditation.  Daily spiritual work.  Not drugs.

Now, I may try Ayahuasca at some point.  It seems to be a useful tool.  But ONLY to complement my daily practice.  Only to, hopefully, open up some pathways, to open some gates I have been pounding on for many years, and which I will then seek to integrate in my daily practice on my mat.

We live in a time of such POSSIBILITY.  So much good is possible right now.  Global peace is possible.  Global prosperity is possible.  But not when we are lazy, when we are running around all day like lunatics, and not when we depend on conflict for psychological stability.