My procedure is simple: I pay my cover, get a bunch of ones, sit right up front, and tip the dancer on stage at least $1 per song. Many men sit for hours a few seats back, expressionless, just watching, but I want to be sure at least SOMEONE is tipping every dancer something, and showing them appreciation. Many dancers find it a turn on to have a man’s full attention.
I wait til a girl comes out who really attracts me, then get a lap dance. I’m no saint, and I have normal urges. I don’t want a girlfriend until I get my emotional house clean, and I don’t believe in pornography. It is absolutely beyond my comprehension how anyone could spend hours watching pornography.
Anyway, sometimes when it isn’t busy, after she’s done we’ll just sit there talking. I’m easy to talk with, and most people enjoy telling their stories. Last night I talked with a girl whose stage name was Ivy for every bit of an hour.
Among other things that came out she revealed she is into bondage, and has on numerous occasions done rope suspensions, which is where she is completely tied up and hung up in the air like an ornament. Her boyfriend does it, and she even did a rope suspension “show”, where she was part of the decorations for a goth/emo music show.
I asked her if it made her come, and she said “OH YEAH”.
But what she said next I found interesting. She said it makes her feel free because she doesn’t have to make any decisions. Someone else is in charge. She doesn’t have to do anything because she can’t do anything.
This is what I have always suspected, and here is the point of this post: roughly one third of our population is into this sort of bondage. Not literally, of course, but the ideology of conformity exists precisely to free people from freedom. It takes the Duhkha of conditioned existence of the Buddhists and makes it into a positive good. I think of the Loki lines from the Avengers movie, lines I could have written for him, and it very certainly applies to many in our social order.
There is plenty enough information in circulation to learn about the world. But large segments of our populace ONLY want to hear that which enables them to remain a part of a group defined not by principle–not by abhorrence of inequality, not by abhorrence of prejudging groups en masse, not by opposition to slavery, not by opposition to violence, not by insistence on human rights, all of these being merely rhetorical props which they use for their demonic work–but solely by the membership itself, solely by conformity to whatever that days “truth” is, whatever that day’s “Kos” is (and I will remind you that Kos is a god in the fictional world of Fritz Lieber).
They hang in the air, voluntarily helpless, and can be swung like swings. These are the headless people. They make truly rational dialogue impossible. They make fixing problems very difficult, because every sane proposal has to make it through a wasp’s nest of lies, distractions, distortions and character assassination.
Edit: she made one other interesting comment, that is was about trust. I said somewhere that trust rewarded is the ultimate aphrodesiac for women, and this is the logical end point of trust: complete helplessness.
Continuing my analogy with leftists, this would be trust in the government, trust in leaders, trust that no matter what the reality would appear to be if that person were capable of apprehending it directly, that everything they are being told is true.
This is the major difference between Leftism and sexual bondage: the latter is honest, and can at times apparently yield desirable results.