Categories
Uncategorized

The Real Self

My kids are on the same sports team, and I was talking with the coach the other day, and he commented on how different they were.  I’ve always sort of taken this for granted, but I got to thinking about it: part of my role as a parent, I have realized, is eliciting their individuality, teasing out what makes them unique and interesting and different.  I am not “placing them in. . .” but rather drawing them out.

Just one seemingly small example: my youngest does not like the volume control on the radio to be on an even number, and I indulge her in this.  There is no good reason for it.  I could easily just demand she stop being irrational, but I go with it.  It is small, and seemingly important to her.  I tease her, of course, but I let her get her way.  If I clamped down on her, I would not just be clamping down on that one thing, but many things.

It sounds perhaps like an exaggeration, but it is not: my singular gift in parenting is in knowing what to do by doing the opposite of what my own parents did.  I was crushed, absolutely, ruthlessly, and with no remorse.

We all have to get to our Real Selves.  This is the part that, definitionally, is real, and by contrast everything else is some degree of lie.  Most anxiety, failure, depression, anger and other negative emotions come from being out of touch with this vital, mutable, emotional place.

In my own case, I am beginning to arrive.  My Real Self is an electrical hurricane; it is Fear itself–not “fear of”, but Fear. I think I discussed my vision of needing to hug a giant rotating circular saw.  I pulled it into my chest in my “dream”, and it killed me.  As I mentioned, I have been doing this repeatedly.  This morning I looked into the eyes of a demon that used to haunt my dreams as a child.  It would hover over me, while I was in a state of sleep paralysis, and I could not open my eyes. I could feel it breathing though. 

This demon symbolizes many things.  This is one area I will not discuss in detail, but I finally saw it this morning, and it scared the crap out of me.  But I kept looking, kept going there, over and over and over.

I inhabit my Real Self and it is a bloody red pancake.  It has no height.  But I truly, really do have faith in the Inner Healer, that rectification, reorientation, renewal are an integral part of being human, if we simply keep moving.  If we “go there” things happen, things organize, light starts seeping in, and what needs to be fixed, gets fixed.

Many would question my capacity for rational or scientific thought in saying this, but I truly do believe there is something to astrology.  There are many ways to interpret charts, but in all of them I have an extremely prominent Mars.  Whatever the source, there is something in me that will not quit in the pursuit of learning how to live and how to learn. It throws me against the rocks over and over and over, breaks me over and over and over, but I keep going.

All of this, all of this introspection and examination, is in the pursuit of learning how to achieve effectively in the outer daylight world.  All my life I have had constant eruptions of unwanted and inappropriate emotion, had constantly to use willpower to keep myself on task, and I truly believe I am on the verge of ending this.

And I will say that I would much rather learn how to learn that be born with knowledge.  It is much, much more useful.

Categories
Uncategorized

Success

Success for a leftist is going from failure to failure with no increased self awareness or sense of responsibility.

Nod to Churchill.

Categories
Uncategorized

Post on Global Warming

 From here: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/22/climate-change-deniers-have-won-global-warming


As I have said often enough, my comments seem to have a knack for disappearing.  This one is mildly snarky, but nothing remotely like most of them.  It is my content people object to.  Cognitive dissonance for the True Believers is an epically unpleasant feeling.

Your comment  that global warming is as proven as the murder of Jews and dissidents at Auschwitz cries out for psychosocial analysis.  You are not apparently unintelligent, and presumably read something or other substantive every day, so your capacity for thought does not remain fully unexercised.

Why then consider something proven, when every hypothesis–which is what a climate model is–has proven wrong?  You do understand, do you not, that guesses as to what might happen do not count as what some quaintly call “facts” in what most of think of when we refer to this process called “science”?

Do you remember Al Gore telling us in 1998 that absent drastic changes the polar ice caps would be gone by now?  I do.  Well, they seem to be growing, despite much greater increases in CO2 than was predicted.  The major change is that Al Gore’s purported humanitarianism has made him one of the richest politicians on the planet, and at that one who uses the most energy.

The “science” can be analyzed point by point, and it breaks down at every level.   This is what I did in 2008, before Climategate made it impossible for any serious person to believe the discussion was unpoliticized: http://www.moderatesunited.blogspot.com/2008/01/global-warming.html

What I have since learned is that atmospheric CO2 is ALREADY absorbing 100% of the radiation which it is capable of absorbing.  How do those pushing this agenda get around this?  They abuse physics. They claim things can happen which have never been measured in any lab.  They lie: that is how.

You need to get out more.  You need to talk to more people who do not have glazed eyes and permaworry lines on their faces.  You need to study the scientific method, and you need to step back and ask what, if anything, has been proven, other than “weather happens.” 

Categories
Uncategorized

Intelligence

As should have been obvious, I had some really good emotional breakthroughs this morning.  This afternoon, I did really well on Lumosity.  I crushed my previous score on one, and got Top 5 on everything else. This despite the fact that I have been doing this thing six months or more nearly daily.  I’m top 2% in my age group now, and should have 1% soon.  Once I get my diet and exercise routines dialed in–both are shit right now–I”m going to shoot for 1% across all age groups.  I’m pretty sure I can do it.  I’m just getting started.

That is me indulging vanity.  Now the point I wanted to make.

There is clearly a link between emotions and even what we might term mechanical processing/RAM sorts of things.  The brain obviously in some ways is a machine, but it is a machine within a web of emotions.  Unprocessed emotion can dictate what you see, how well you see it, and how fast you see it.  They slow you down and make you stupider and less agile.

When one looks at rigid dogmatists, like the proselytizing atheists–who I tend to think of as paradigmatic dogmatists–what you must see FIRST is corrupted emotion, frozen in time, and directing their capacity for honest thinking away into more congenial–but wrong–climates.  The first line in my Grand Inquisitor is “Myth always preceded philosophy” (or something close to that).  This is my point.  Myth–primal beliefs about the nature of the world, of people, and of one’s self–always happen before one starts the process of “reasoning”.

You can debate facts, but you cannot debate myth–at least not until you get people deep enough to realize that deep rooted assumptions about the world can in fact be questioned, and may in fact be wrong.  Misunderstanding this fact is often fatal to productive dialogue.

You cannot reason about people, per se. They are a mutable, reactive surface.  You can only use reason consistently about objects.  Math we can all agree is a use of reason, of logic.  Its practice–if not its inspirations–is devoid of emotion, or the need for emotion.

As I say, though, there is emotional logic: it is simply not linear OUTSIDE of the emotional sphere.  There it is linear, but not in a way we normally think of.

In emotional logic, if you want to avoid accessing suppressed and dangerous emotions, you must live in your head.  If you live in your head, you have to do something, and you have to justify that something.  Logically, this would involve immersion in an activity devoid of the need for emotion.  “Science” fits this bill nicely.  But you have to go further.  You have to protect yourself from the possibility of unwanted emotion.  How to do this?   By making the world into objects.  Objects are susceptible to logic, where people are not.  Thus a metaphysics forms from childhood trauma.

These points are subtle, but what I am showing is how intelligent people become stupid–or rather, one of the ways.  There are many.

Categories
Uncategorized

Abreaction

I am going to wander in this post.  When I’m not sure how to start, I just start.

Abreaction means “to react away from”, from the German Abreagierung.

Sublimate: Chemistry .

a.

to convert (a solid substance) by heat into a vapor, which on cooling condenses again to solid form, without apparent liquefaction. 
Freud:

Psychology . the diversion of the energy of a sexual or other biological impulse from its immediate goal to one of a more acceptable social, moral, or aesthetic nature or use. 
If it is not obvious, I am not a big fan of Freud.  To the extent one can dislike someone he has never met, and who died long before I was born, I dislike him.  Still, he was brilliant.

I toured a whiskey distillery last week, and was struck by the process of distillation, and I am struck now in noting the appropriateness of quasi- or literally chemistry terms for emotional processes.

There are only two psychotherepeutic modalities in common expression in our world which take as their PRIMARY goal the process of abreaction: Dianetics and Holotropic Breathwork.  In Dianetics–and I am using the word loosely, not knowing too many of the details, many of which are perhaps not in the public domain to begin with–they do what is called “auditing”, which as I understand the process involves hooking someone up to what amounts to a lie detector–I believe I read somewhere it is two metal handles one holds which conduct electrical impulses and detect sweat, etc.–and having someone say a series of words, and waiting for a reaction.  If one occurs, that person is to go as deeply as possible into those emotions.

This process seems to me potentially useful, but of course Scientology as a whole is a mess.  They sue everyone and everything, demand more and more and more money from people, and obviously have some very odd beliefs, like the idea of Thetans.  Whatever merits the process may have, it seems not to get expressed in freedom from greed, from vanity, from power lust, or in increases in the capacities for kindness, love, generosity and patience.  If any of you fools want to sue me, spare yourself the trouble and just post your intent in comments, and I will just delete this.  It is not necessary for my argument.

Within Breathwork, what I have learned is that there is a skill in activating what might be called the liminal side, the side beyond which it all fades to confusion in the reasoning mind.  One of the women in my last session could activate instantly.  I watched another guy breath relentlessly for hours without anything happening. It is a skill.

And it is a skill that can be practiced daily.  For my own purposes, I developed what I am calling Microactivation.  Microdosing LSD is apparently an area of some interest in some quarters.  I am simply borrowing the metaphor.

You can do this simply by exposing yourself to stimuli and allowing/facilitating a reaction.  H.R. Giger is an obvious example.  I bought myself Max Ernst’s “Une Semaine de Bonte” for this purpose.  I had previously found it incomprehensibly violent and weird, but realize that a lot of this would qualify as Matrix 3 in the Grof paradigm, and that in their inchoate way–in their post WW1, traumatized, searching way–perhaps they were partially on the right path. (the bird-headed man, by the way, who takes the woman away in Eyes  Wide Shut, is right out of Ernst).  I bought myself a “graphic novel” (bound set of comic book) for this purpose.  Hawkeye.

And I have been isolating and emphasizing a negative inner voice that has been there, I believe, since before I could walk.  As I think I shared, in what was for me a very emotional post, my “spiritual guide” is a set of buzz saws, five of them, arrayed in a wedge.  I have read enough that I listened.  I am taking it at its word.  I am using it.  Over the past few weeks or month, I have visualized being killed perhaps fifty or a 100 times a day, in every possible way.  I walk into the buzz saw of course, which goes through my chest and cuts me in half, but am buried alive, beaten, my throat slit, decapitated, dismembered, burnt, dissolved in acid, crushed, dropped from height, drowned: everything I can think of, everything which comes to me.

And it occurred to me that what this is, is a sort of hook which is baiting the actual traumas.  A man whose life and work I admire greatly–Jack Schwarz–described this process in the perhaps quaint or even silly term psi-phoning, which encapsulates both the process of psychic resonance/connection, and the siphoning of poison out of wound.

This morning I had a very powerful experience from early childhood, of being feeling abandoned by my mother.  It was extraordinarily unpleasant, but what I have learned is that if you develop the habit of leaning into these sorts of experiences, of embracing them, of pulling them in, rather than them forcing their way in–intruding–in to you, their duration is short, as indeed this one was.  And I felt better, much better.  I am becoming calm, to my core.

And it occurs to me that with my apparent self abuse, my weirdness, my “My god this guy is fucked up”, my process, I am practicing welcoming negativity and unpleasantness into my life.  Here is the thing: it was THERE, it was secretly infecting and directing all sorts of maladaptive behaviors, but without my awareness.  Now that I am aware, my full self can make more informed decisions.

I would offer this analogy.  You know someone, but not well.  You are not sure if you like them or not, but you go on a trip with them, you get to know them well, and now you KNOW you don’t like them or want them in your life.

I will give you another name: Roberto Assagioli, who created a process he called psychosynthesis.  His thesis–as I understand it, my exposure to him being limited to an essay in Stan and Christina Grof book “Spiritual Emergency”–was my experience, which is that people have multiple “selves” which are often in conflict with each other, unconsciously.  The process of psychological and then spiritual growth lies in contacting these “selves”,and reconciling them.

Return to the chemical meaning of “sublime”.  It means converting a solid to vapor and back to a solid.  You make all these “selves” vaporous, and bring them back in a new, more useful form.

Well, this is not time wasted, but time I should have spent doing “daylight” work. That will have to do for now.

Peace.

Actually, I will add, this is a lot of highly personal stuff.  I prefer not to think about who all may be reading this.  At the same time, my conviction is solid that in the end, when we understand it all, we will realize there was never any hiding anyway, and my sense is that these musings and these de facto confessions might benefit someone, spark an idea, a project, a personal renewal or other worthwhile and useful activity.

Use your time today well.  Learn something, feel something, see something, and see someone.  You will never be better than you are now, and there is nothing that will remain when the spiritual flames are done.  I don’t understand this, but contradictions make life more fun.



Categories
Uncategorized

The “Oedipal Complex”

In “The Assault on Truth”, Jeffrey Masson detailed how Sigmund Freud early on stumbled upon nearly incontrovertible evidence that the sexual abuse of children–particularly young girls–was very common, even among Viennese elites.  He saw clearly the relationship between early unprocessed sexual trauma and hysteria, which had been his focal topic of interest.  He wrote a paper called the Aetiology of Hysteria (note how short the citation is) which he presented, and which was more or less greeted with silence.  No doubt many guilty men sat in the room.

Being fundamentally a vain and ambitious man, he realized, on some level (this is Freud we are talking about), that this work was a path to career suicide.  Thus, again on some level, he concluded that the patients must be fantasizing about such abuse, and we the modern Western world were eventually introduced to the idea that very small children have sexual fantasies about their parents, and not the converse.

Masson’s book was ground-breaking, and led in short order to a generalized awakening about the pervasiveness of child sexual abuse.  When it was published in 1984, the shocking revelations about a conspiracy in the Catholic Church to hide and protect pedophiles (as I have discussed, his role in covering up such crimes–and the discovery of his role–is likely why the last Pope resigned, in an historically unprecedented fashion) was years in the future. Altar boys were still being molested, and not believed when they reported their crimes.  This is not directly relevant to the point I’m about to make, but ponder that, and also ponder how in most of the world, there has been no such awakening.  It remains my strong belief that in the Arab world in particular, with its heinous and emotionally abusive segregation of and violence towards women, child sexual abuse must be endemic, both father-child, and brother-sister/cousin.

Here is the point I actually wanted to make: why not posit an inverse “Oedipal” dynamic?  Logically, if many children were in FACT sexually abused, were not many more simply looked at as sexual objects, in ways they could not understand, but readily felt?  What sort of introject is created when a parent expresses–perhaps unconsciously–sexual desire, but does not act on it?  Should we not have a name for what opposite sex parents feel when their children reach puberty and young adulthood?  Of course.  As a culture, we are imbeciles, primitives.  We feel and see almost nothing that matters.  We have iPads, but we do not understand love.

It is really a global tragedy that Freud both attained such influence, that he was clearly a genius, and that he abandoned nearly at the outset almost all of his most useful ideas.  My next post will be on Abreaction, which is a word I like the more I use it.

Categories
Uncategorized

Gollum

I am making progress.  I have said that a number of times, and it has been true.  I have had many, many, many miles to cover.  When I do things, I do them correctly and completely.

This week I have been noticing a “Gollum” voice and puzzling over it (to be clear, I am not hallucinating, but rather paying close attention to what I suppose I could call inner psychological moments.  I have a CD created by Paul Ekman on lie detection through what he calls “microexpressions”, which are facial expressions that for a split second betray true emotions, prior to being covered up.  There is an inner psychological process similar to this.)

As I analyze it, it occurs to me that it is an expression of self loathing IN TANDEM WITH a sense of some external perfection. Very early childhood wounds can create this emotion, but the mind needs reasons; and by mind I mean that mind/heart synthesis which in Hindi they call Mun.  It seeks reconciliation, and like water it flows by the easiest path, which quite often is not the correct path.  It does not necessarily, and in fact frequently does, describe truth.  Truth might be that your mother was a thoughtless uncaring bitch, but that is a hard truth to accept.

So your relatively Unconscious creates a perfection against which you have failed, and against which you will always fail.  You cannot hope to succeed, which means that you will never have to honestly explain your feelings of self hate.  The more Gollum hated himself, the more beautiful the Ring became.

And consider Sauron himself.  I have described evil as the inner acceptance of self hatred.  Can we say that power itself is the perfection against which such self loathing is measured?  That such people seek power precisely because they hate themselves unconsciously, and yet semi-consciously fight against this?  That they are in a conflict between justifying their existence and execrating themselves?  I think this gets at something very deep.

Remember, Sauron’s very existence–his soul, his self–was tied with the Ring, and hence the unrealizable ideal of perfection.  We have this common sense notion that, as Bruce Springsteen put it, (in what used to be one of my favorite songs) “Poor men want to be rich/ Rich men want to be king/ and the king ain’t satisfied ’til he rules everything.”  And at that, ruling everything would not be enough either, because in the end power was not actually the goal.  The justification of existence was, and the self loathing only increased in the process of doing all the evil things it takes to win and keep power.  The process is inherently contradictory.

In my own case, I have wondered what used to drive me to debate so hard and long on the internet.  I used to spend hours every day arguing with people, being insulted relentlessly (this is what leftists do: I state this clinically and as a matter of extensive empirical validation), and it seems to me it was simultaneously a desire to be abused, and a desire for power, both deriving from unprocessed emotions I have finally figured out how to process. That is why I can say this.

William James commented 100 or more years ago, that psychology really only has three tools: introspection, measurement, and a combination.  Clearly, when we want to generalize our own emotional processes, there is the risk that we projecting.  At the same time, many of us clearly share many life experiences, feel the same things, and this fact creates the possibility of connection.

Peace be upon you.

Categories
Uncategorized

Evil Simplified

The attempt of people suffering from grotesque emotional wounds to maintain psychological stability in an unhealthy and ultimately self destructive way.
Categories
Uncategorized

Crimea

Can we call it what it is?  An Anschluss, without the anti-Semitism.  Austria was not what should have precipitated war.  The Rhineland was, particularly when combined with his audacity in stating his objectives openly.

Even I get a bit foggy, but most people have never been any other way.

Categories
Uncategorized

Ukraine

Our sole national interest in this region is staying the hell away and avoiding a war.  If the Europeans want war, let THEM wage it.  Fucking assholes.  They want us to do their dirty work, but have never paid for any of it.  Our soldiers are too good for this shit.  Let Putin have the Crimea, and if Russia and Ukraine go to war, so be it.  If Putin wants to keep marching, then we can think about it, but from where I am sitting, he is reacting to what he no doubt perceives as a Western sponsored, anti-Russian coup in the Ukraine.

Put another way, we started this.  Why, I don’t know.  We don’t need anything over there.  It likely has something to do with the bankers who rule the world.

It would gratify me to see him put my financial plan into action.  He can do it.  Increasingly, I view the world through a prism of a fundamental conflict between the people of the world and the bankers, and the intermediaries through whom they act.

If someone can name me one strategic interest we have in the Ukraine beyond some amorphous concept like “credibility”, I will take this all back.  Hell: we elected Obama twice.  Why shouldn’t any right-thinking human being view us as a nation of gullible and weak imbeciles?  I do.