Author: White Whale

The essence of the Fabian strategy, still quite alive and well, is that no matter how outrageous a demand–such as that men be allowed openly to use women’s restrooms, effectively vitiating the concept of gender difference entirely–that it be formatted as decency, as courtesy, as self evident, as something, opposing which, one becomes a bad person.

George Bernard Shaw, a clever psychopath, clearly saw that people are socialized for politeness, and that if one never forsakes their idiom, one can do ANYTHING, if one is sufficiently patient about it.  Formalism, crassness, and gradualness might be their motto.  If you only put a bit of shit in the soup, and insist that it would be impolite to insult the cook–who after all is a hard working Negro woman who is resiliently happy, singing in the kitchen, and so such a warm soul–then you get people to eat it.  Having eaten it, they justify it as having not just been necessary, but GOOD.  This makes the addition of more shit something they might even welcome.

Certainly large numbers people in our own world have been trained to welcome Islamic rapists, aspiring mass murderers, and homophobic misogynists, when they have simultaneously been taught to oppose ALL those traits in their own.  Shit soup.  That is what it is.

Logically, if the social situation has been set up such that opposing the left wing idea of the day is bad form, is bad manners, then one MUST be an asshole–or at least understand one will be called that–in order to speak ANY useful truth.  We HAVE to have someone willing to be crass.  There is no other choice, if we want needed truths to see the light of the day.

And it is the Left which has made this mathematically necessary.  Of course, I am not speaking to them.  One would do as well speaking to rocks, or Moonies.  Most of them are gone, never to return.

No: I speak to the non-lunatics among us, as we are many.  None of what has gone before need continue.  It is not too late to turn the ship around.  

But both of these agendas, obviously, dovetail to perfection with the notion of creating an Orwellian surveillance state, which is what we live in today.  This blog post is being downloaded and recorded by the NSA.  Unless they see some reason to think it important enough to read, it will simply be saved for future reference, and filed under my name, which they obviously know.  They know everything about me: where I live, my phone number, my work history, my tax record, who at least my on-line friends are, my political views, a rough or perhaps very specific psychological profile, etc.

How did this come to be?  Well, Oklahoma City, which has at least the fingerprints of a government cover-up all over it, even if it may not have been planned by the government.  Here is my treatment from some years ago: https://moderatesunitedblog.com//2014/05/oklahoma-city-was-cover-up.html

And then of course 9/11, which I have covered in a number of posts.  The standard story is a lie.  Not possibly, not probably: CERTAINLY, beyond any possible doubt.  An impartial court would find this 100 times out of 100.

To transfer great power to the government–and in particular to unelected functionaries whose names by and large are top secret–one must have great fear.  9/11 created great fear.

If we survive this era with our freedoms intact, future historians will be utterly unable to understand how so many of us were so fucking stupid.

People mock Trump for his ignorance of national debt.  But what happened?  It got put on the table both as a problem, and as one the solution to which it is possible to have conversations.  This is not something they want.  A small handful of people control our economy and could crash it tomorrow if they wanted.  Think about this: people whose names we largely don’t know–other than figureheads like Janet Yellen–could drop America into a severe depression without warning, without authorization, and largely without traces of their interfering.  Is that not a power to be checked?  Is any system of checks and balances which relies entirely on the continuing and continuous good will and fidelity of the people running it a system of checks and balances AT ALL?  We DON”T KNOW what the Fed does in full, so it can’t possibly be overseen, and even if it were, we have no means of telling them to do anything.

This ludicrous situation exists in plain sight, and people are too fucking stupid to see it, largely because they have been taught to believe that if it isn’t in the media, it doesn’t exist.  That has never been true, and gets less true every year.

The other point I wanted to make was that if Bill Clinton was the first black President, Trump will be the first Jewish one.  I know, of course, that he isn’t Jewish, but you’ll find his picture right next to chutzpah in the dictionary.

There is another actual Jew in the race, but if Hillary has to personally rip his heart out with her teeth to get the nomination, she will.  The meaning of her entire life, everything she has done, all the lies she has told, and all the lives she has ruined, comes down to the next six months.  If being Queen means never having to say you are sorry, she wants with every fiber of her being to be Queen.

I don’t plan to use the restrooms at Facebook, nor do any of my children. I do use Facebook as a means of political education and propagation, and as such it has been and remains quite useful. That Mark Zuckerberg’s ethical system consists in platitudes, cliches, slavish conformity to anti-rational zealotry, and a healthy dose of anti-empirical atheism, is not my problem. 

I do not boycott Hollywood because most of them are lunatics.  Unreason is in the air and water. It cannot be avoided. 

Your argument is a non sequitur. Combined with your ad hominem, your non-argument is par for the course for the Left. The reason those terms are in Latin is because they were recognized as the last recourse of exhausted minds well before Christ was born. Your form of public ignorance is very old, because it is very easy. Vanity is easy to feel, easy to express. Heartfelt and serious engagement with important topics is work. It feels like work, and most people are lazy. You are lazy, as you show here. 

The point is made that ONLY the rights of .03% of our population matter. Why would this be so? Why would not the rights of mothers and fathers, grandmothers and grandfathers, not to watch men dressed as men follow their daughters and granddaughters into the womens room matter? You live in a propaganda world, one where only those rights matter which have been stipulated that day by the media elite you worship without reflection, without knowing. If they decided the rights of mothers mattered tomorrow, you would agitate in that direction, because without knowing it, you believe nothing. I believe that everyone has a right to stake their claims, but that not everyone has the right to, or CAN, have them met to their equal satisfaction. 

What we are seeing are claims to power, and power mongering is something we should all fear and oppose.

This really is an election about the future of America. Trump is getting nominated for the very simple reason that most Americans have done this math, and come out with him as the only credible answer. In my own view, if we don’t contain this invasion NOTHING else matters. Whatever your pet issue is, you can forget about it, because the people who win will be those who promise the most free stuff to people who speak English–if they speak it at all–as a second language.

And to be clear, I have nothing against people who speak other languages.  I have studied many of them.  What I object to is the cultural importation of certain expectations that have ruined most of Latin America.  Mexicans have a country: it is called Mexico.  They are trying to escape what they created, much as the Venezuelans would, if we shared a border with them.  We do not need to endorse and support stupidity.  America is a globally dominant power because as a people we have hewed to certain principles, including hard work, honesty, patriotism, and self sacrifice.  Those nations which have failed, have failed because they held in superior esteem values like tribalism, the abuse of power, and a superior regard for the well being of their immediate family and friends than the society as a whole.

Much of the world considers work, particularly manual work, to be something which superior people do not undertake.  America considers work the essence of virtue.  This is why we succeed.

It occurs to me that what we call evil is actually best understood as a natural energy taken too far.  Evil is a healthy expression of self, of individuality, taken to the point where it is unhealthy.  It can be very useful to be cruel to oneself at times, but almost never to others.  But not never.  Physical Therapists, and drill instructors have to be mean to get people past their self imposed and inaccurate limitations.

But if we are all cows, doing emotional grazing, there is a circle within which the grass is green and healthy and nourishing.  Only if we stray beyond that circle does it involve us in manias, drain us of happiness and emotional wealth, and cause us to want more the more we eat.

This is most religions. 

Whatever worships beauty, love, light, and laughter, that is true.  Outer forms matter no more in religion than they do in other social conventions.

This of course is not original.  But what is new, is that I mean it, for me.

Does the same impulse which once cast children into fires now work to create artificial intelligence?

Whatever we are as a civilization, it is clearly not sane.