Author: White Whale

Another story that will be suppressed by the media: https://youtu.be/PQkm4MtGNAQ

Former chef said he heard Hillary say of a server who screwed something up “That N–R”.

As Paul Joseph Watson admits, because he is a credible journalist, this is mere hearsay.  But so too has been the looping coverage of alleged assaults by Trump which remained unreported for decades, despite how ridiculously easy it would have been to sue him.  The first gal’s account was physically impossible, and her phone number linked to the Clinton Foundation.

As he also says, imagine if someone came forward and said they heard Trump use the N word.  It would be 24/7 for weeks.

Our media is broken. The first step to fixing it is denying them ad revenue by not watching them.

If Obama is willing to start a nuclear war with Russia to protect his fellow Democrats, imagine the kind of pressure he can bring to bear on Ecuador.

I wonder if Trump can get her to stump with him. It would help a lot. She can obviously be vocal about her disagreements with him, but they can also share their areas of agreement, specifically that Hillary should NOT be allowed anywhere near the Presidency, that TPP is a disaster, and that nuclear might just ruin our day.  Certainly, it would not be good for the environment.

And obviously, she would get some sort of position in the Trump administration.  This would translate her now hopeless campaign into a potential engine of some change in the direction she wants.  Surgeon General would be a good choice.

Two further ideas occur to me: she also cannot have been a fan of the notion of a borderless hemisphere, as she ACTUALLY seems to care about American workers, and that whatever voters she might peal from Hillary would likely go to her, not Trump.

Hey you remember those crazies who thought some power elite was trying to make one country of Mexico, the U.S. and Canada?

They weren’t crazy. In fact the plan is ENTIRE HEMISPHERE. They weren’t crazy enough.

Like many, I am obsessing a bit about this election.  I really do feel like this is for all the marbles.  If we continue down this path, we get a softer edged but equally nasty 1984.

And it feels like a fight, but the fight is not really between voters, by and large.  It is between the public and the media.  It is trying to get needed information into the public space when all the major “news” networks are working HARD to suppress it.  Wikileaks, for example, has been all but buried by all the major networks, including Fox.  This is extraordinary, and extraordinarily frustrating.

A certain percentage of Democrats vote every election.  Most college educated people vote every election and always have.

What is different this year is that a LOT of people love Trump, and nobody likes Hillary.  She doesn’t set anyone on fire like Trump does. She can’t fill cafeterias, much less stadiums, and in any even at the moment she is not campaigning at all.

My personal guess is that this election will be like no other, and that many, many people with a high school education or less who normally sit the elections out, are going to turn out in droves to vote for Trump.  Romney had nothing to say to them.  Neither did John McCain, who may as well be a Democrat.

If we can avoid mass election fraud, we can definitely win this.  

http://projectveritasaction.com/rigging-election-video-i-clinton-campaign-and-dnc-incite-violence-trump-rallies.html

I am going to start linking stories I feel are important, because the war is on with the media.  Even Fox News is pushing hard against Trump.  He has the support of the people, and only a few websites, of the sort that Hillary wants to shut down, like Breitbart and InfoWars.

Here, what is described is illegal collusion between Hillary’s campaign, PAC’s and the DNC.  I don’t know what the laws are, but they themselves said they were breaking them.  It’s unambiguous.

Much worse, they are paying people to create incidents at Trump rallies.  They are intentionally provoking people.  Oxygen lady?  Paid agitator.  Chicago riot?  Paid agitators.  They train them, they pay them.  They even hire crazy people to do crazy shit.  Anything to disrupt the rallies, anything to make it harder to convey a message, anything to allow the media–who are obviously only too willing to oblige–to paint Trump supporters as crazy and violent.

This has NOTHING to do with developing coherent policy, with helping people, with compassion.  It is simply thugs doing what thugs go.  There is no vision of a better world, just Democrats winning elections.

I think “Women’s Liberation” played an important role in all this, and so does early exposure to electronics. I think the massive disruptions in marriage roles created a great deal of instability in the homes of children born after, say, 1975.  What I would specifically hypothesize is that Attachment patterns were disrupted both by the increases in divorce, and by women going to work.  Both would create increased levels of stress in the woman, and make her less emotionally available to her children, as well, obviously, in the case of working mothers less physically available.  To this we could perhaps add the resentment she was taught at that time to feel about her situation, which could not but have been perceived by the children.

Economic factors would play into that as well.  Perhaps the large banks that run the world created the inflation in the 1970’s to support their war on families, as well as to secure the cessation of any remaining limits on their ability to create and gift money (which they got around 1980).  Make earning a living harder, create a need to compete with men in women, and you get little children who do not get enough love.  Those children grow up feeling disspirited, lonely, and unable to connect with very deep feelings of hurt and anger.

Secondly, consider the proper role of Mirror Neurons.  When they are working properly, they enable attachment and socialization.  We feel what other people feel.  We look in their eyes and see sadness, or laughter, or anger.  This is the basis of empathy.

Consider how a child is socialized when their main interactions are with an electronic device which can be controlled by them, but which cannot mirror them.  This child would look normal on the outside, but not understand basic human emotions.  Pile this on top of a distracted busy mother–and I do think it needs to be the mother, political correctness be damned, because you were in HER womb, and we are hard wired to respond differently to mothers–and you get these little shits I see on the internet.

They KNOW something is wrong with them, but they have no idea what.  I know something is wrong with them, and that is my best guess.

I am rewatching Andrei Tarkovky’s masterpiece “Nostalghia”, and it starts with a meditation on motherhood, its difficulty, its joys.  An obviously “liberated” woman comes into a very old church during a ceremony intended to help a woman conceive a child, and asks the sacristan why so many more women are there than men.  He says something like “a woman’s job is to raise children, and that requires patience and sacrifice”.  And she sounds disgusted and says “and that’s ALL they are for?”  He shrugs and says “you asked me”.

But is there not something sacred in motherhood?  And do we not dilute or eradicate that sacrality by treating babies like unwanted gallstones?  It would seem to me that in diminishing motherhood, we diminish childhood.  Rather than a sacred responsibility, it becomes something to get through or–as is the case in much of Europe–to avoid entirely.

Wisdom involves moving slowly, often.  Seeing what is there without assuming it can be reduced to an abstraction and then plugged into a formula.  That does not involve the body and senses.  And most of life cannot be reduced to words.  If you are living at the word level, you are not living.  If you can speak all you know, you know little, at least consciously.  The knowledge is always there, but it vanishes when it is ignored and suppressed.

I stumbled into a Leftist ghetto accidentally today, and got trolled by everyone as usual, but it got me to wondering exactly HOW Leftists are mentally ill.  Presenting symptoms are patent incongruities between stated moral standards and actual behavior, an inability to honestly introspect and learn from experience, hostility to actual diversity of opinion, emotional superficiality, and a lack of empathy.

This is what I came up with:

Leftism is a form of emotional retardation. It is failure to develop, specifically, a core sense of personal agency, leading to patent narcissistic tendencies, an inability to effectively introspect, an intolerance toward unfamiliar or non-compliant ideas, and an enduring sense of emotional isolation because mature social bonds are not possible without individuation.

When we use the term Nanny State it is in many respects because we are breeding babies.

It will be an interesting task for some future historian, if there are any, to figure out how so many people were so corrupted, how their process of socialization was so bastardized that half this country failed to emerge from childhood.

I will ponder it, but I don’t expect any easy answers. 

I’m drinking Bloody Mary’s until I fall asleep tonight. I have to get up early, so I’ll likely be a bit groggy.

This morning I woke up worrying about this election, like I usually do, but then the worry just fell away.  It was odd.  Some part of me thought “I SHOULD be worrying”, but it wasn’t there.  It wasn’t even some part of me telling some other part of me to be quiet.  It was just quiet.  Silence.  It was good. This is the sort of progress I have been chasing.

If you look for it, there is always some reason to worry.  And if you are capable of it, calm is always possible.

There is a story I read that I have always liked that I have probably shared, but not recently, I don’t think.  The guy that founded the SEAL’s was named Roy Boehm.  He had a lot of crazy stories in his life, and his biography is well worth the read. If you read one SEAL book, read his.

Anyway, he and some Vietnamese SEAL’s (LDDN maybe?  That is what is coming to me at the moment) were assaulting an NVA or VC boat that had run aground on the side of a river.  Boehn and his comrades ran towards this thing and he ran headlong into something, maybe a tree, maybe the prop of the boat, and he DROPPED like a rock.  I don’t know if you have ever ran into something so fast that hit your head that your feet literally kept going and you fell on your back, but I have.  More than once, frankly, if I am honest, although I am not proud of my lack of awareness. It’s instantaneous and comical.  Anyway, his troops paused a moment to laugh at him, and he said that was one of his proudest moments as a Commander.  They were facing imminent death for all they knew, but they were relaxed enough to take a moment to laugh at him and his clumsiness.  I have told this story to my kids multiple times.  It’s a great story, in my world.

The connection here is that even in life and death situations, shit man, just take it the fuck easy.  Nobody beats death in the end, and you miss all the fun parts trying.

I remember in the last election feeling good, then the hurricane blew in, and I had the dream of the headless people.  We had a hurricane this year–the first I recall since then–but the energy feels different.  I am often wrong, but that is what I feel, not what I think.  At its best, feeling is a direct path to what intellect achieves slowly and poorly, but of course at its worst it breeds chaos and death.

I’m listening to Bob Seger tonight.  I compare him to Neil Diamond: highly maligned, but highly talented and I don’t give a fuck what people think.

That should conclude Mary’s comments for tonight.  I’ll be back tomorrow to say God knows what.  I create the space, pay attention to it, and ideas come. It’s how I live my life. And it’s not a bad life.

I continue to think if Danney Williams were at the last debate, Trump can mention it, and use it as a way of telling the American people that important stories are being concealed from them, that CNN–and he can name the outlets–are simply not reporting important stories, at the same time they are doing ZERO fact checking on these sudden and decades late complaints about Trump.

And I think there is a racial angle as well: it is likely a factor that Bill can’t own Danney–can’t admit he is the father–just because he was conceived out of wedlock, but because he is half BLACK. And Bill was clearly taking advantage of his mothers poverty as well.

And Danney can look Bill and Hillary in the eyes, in all likelihood. He know his father is not a good person, but it would still be good to see him.

I do feel many Americans are waking up.  I obviously wish I had a crystal ball to see if that is true, and how this story ends, but I am quite convinced the complicit media polls are not even a remotely acceptable substitute.

Among other things, I think we will see record turnout from ordinary Americans who usually don’t vote, and I would suspect millions of black voters who were eager to vote for Obama will simply stay home.  Hillary is The Man too.