Author: White Whale

I want to drain the swamp.  Hillary IS the swamp.  Even she doesn’t know who all she has taken money from, and who she owes favors to, but you can bet they don’t have the best interests of the American people at heart.  You want corruption OUT of Washington?  Vote for me.  Make America Great Again.

This would be particularly effective if Trump were paying for it out of his own pocket.

I think ads could be targeted to different markets.  This idea is likely obvious, but I think an ad targeting inner cities might be interesting which shows the promises made to them by Democrat politicians from JFK until now–JFK, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama, with maybe a few Senators or prominent other politicians thrown in.  Depending on how it did in focus groups, you might have a black narrator on there, and end with Malcolm X calling people who keep voting for Democrats without getting anything chumps.  You would definitely need a black voice narrating it, though, but it could work.  It could get through.

Trump has balls.  Political courage makes a lot of things possible.

Here is an idea: require all recipients of Federal educational funding–all universities and colleges–to require all students to undergo one hour a year of training in conservative ideas.  If they don’t do it–and I have in mind requiring students to watch an hour of PragerU videos and taking short quizzes on them–they get their funding pulled.

The level of indoctrination at most universities is Orwellian.  It is Stalinesque (really, Lenin started everything Stalin continued, but Stalin’s name seems to evoke more emotion).

These kids obviously are getting plenty of left wing indoctrination, so that side of the coin is obviously going well represented.

We cannot continue as a nation of two completely different mindsets when it comes to politics, which cannot interact in any way. I can talk to Leftists, but they can’t talk to me.  They just start shouting and frothing at the mouth.

And I think Trump could likely do this with Executive Order.  Yes, of course all of us have been bemoaning Obama’s use of Executive Orders, but to my mind this cause would be worth it.  Most of these kids literally have NO IDEA why someone would vote Republican, and absent an outside intervention no one will teach them.  They close their ears and stop listening any time someone tries.

And I fully expect many of them to become more violent–there has been quite a bit of violence already–if Trump wins.

We are fighting for sanity.  Sanity is a good cause.

I have had this sense for some time that Trump understand political emotion and political momentum.  There is little point building up energy early on that later dissipates.  It doesn’t matter a bit who is ahead 6 weeks ahead of the election, which is why I don’t think he is running many campaign ads.  In any event, it is likely anybody watching enough TV to be influenced by those ads is already indoctrinated by the media.  His campaign depends on talk in coffee shops, around dinner tables and especially on social media.  That is the only way he is staying close (or has taken a slight lead according to the Investors Business Daily poll).

But he has committed to spending $100 million of his own money.  What is the smartest way to do that?  Given his unorthodox approaches to public relations, why not spend the whole wad in the last week before the election?  A blitz like nobody has done before?  This might be a good idea, if he mainly runs positive ads, and I think that would play well.  Nobody could take the fingernails on the chalkboard of relentless “my opponent is a big meany head and hates puppies” ads on continual loop, but what about ads focused on what people DO want?

He has signaled, perhaps, a beginning of this approach with this excellent Contract with the American Voter which is any REAL conservatives dream.  If you are a Republican and don’t support this, I can only assume you have been bought and paid for by the same special interests he is trying to get rid of.  That, you are are an idiot, or you are an assholes.  And we seem to have plenty of assholes.

But a sample ad might be:

I want to protect American Jobs.

I want to create a lot more.

I want insurance premiums to go down, and healthcare to get better.

I want secure borders and to get criminals here illegally out.

I want to end corruption in Washington.

I want to avoid pointless wars.

I want less taxes, so you hard working Americans keep more of your money, and so employers of all sizes can afford to hire more people.

Etc.  That is off the top of my head.  Maybe:

I want to protect American jobs, my opponent wants to export them with more horrible trade deals.

I want to lower taxes on the middle class and on employers of all sizes, so the people have more money, and employers can afford to hire.  My opponent wants to raise taxes on everyone, and make it much harder to do business.

I want secure borders, so we only let in people who benefit this nation, which very definitely IS a nation of immigrants.  My opponent wants to get rid of borders from Canada to Argentina.

I want you to keep your doctor and your health insurance plan and for both to be affordable.  My opponents wants more of the same failure we have seen with Obamacare.

Etc.

But being a bit of a student of history, I cannot help but draw a parallel with this strategy, if this is what he has in mind, and World War 1.  I remember in one or perhaps multiple battles–likely Somme or Verdun–the British conducted a 24 hour artillery bombardment, then attacked.  It failed.  The Germans had simply hid in their bunkers, then came out.

In 1918 Paul Hindenburg did something like what later became the Blitzkrieg.  They picked a spot on the French lines, and dropped roughly the same number of shells in TWO HOURS that the British had sent desultorily in 24.  They then attacked in a tight concentration with the sole intent to punch through the lines.  They used shock troops with, if memory serves, flame throwers.  They advanced a long way–let’s say 10 miles–in a day or two, when they had remained stuck for years in the same place.  As I recall logistics finally came into play–they were not able to effectively supply their troops–so the plan ultimately failed.

But that is where this analogy fails.  What Trump can do is very focused “assaults” on key Swing States, with ads at least roughly 80/20 positive, and he only has to maintain momentum through Election Day.

Possibly, he can even gamble his base is sufficient in most Red States that it will hold.  I am no expert , obviously, but these are some ideas I will put out into the Universe.

I keep hearing the mantra being repeated “fat shaming is never OK.  Fat shaming is never OK.  Fat shaming is never OK. Fat shaming is never OK.”

And I think of George Bernard Shaw calling for mass murder, but doing so in such a congenial way that people accepted it or thought it a joke.  And he knew this would be the case.

Their program, the Fabian program, was oriented around enacting horrific and socially cataclysmic political policies, but doing so in a genteel, urbane, polite, polished way.

And part of the indoctrination people have received is that how someone says something is more important than what they say.  College students are taught there are no truths, but how you speak is vitally important.  Speech becomes more important than action, and moral comparisons–mass murder versus fat shaming as one example, become impossible.  It’s much easier to agree fat shaming is worse, at least when the mass murder is not being visited currently upon those doing the judging.

Hillary got 4 men killed in Benghazi, did not give a shit, accepted no real blame, lied to their parents about why they died, lied to the American people and the media about it, then to add a final insult to injury, accused the parents of those who SHE GOT KILLED of lying about what she said to them.

This Muslim dad is just a stage prop, who is either a useful idiot, or more likely (I have not dug up on this) a covert Islamist who is only too happy to use the occasion of his sons death to support anti-Trump propaganda.  You know, THOUSANDS of American parents lost sons and daughters in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Being a Gold Star Dad is not unique.  He was not the only hero.  And his son is likely telling him from beyond to stop using him as a political prop, which is an insult to his memory.  Hillary’s support among rank and file military is dismal.  She broke laws they all KNOW would have gotten them court martialed and jailed, did so often, did so very intentionally, and did so with ZERO regard for national security or American interests.  I have little doubt his son would be a Trump supporter, if he was the dedicated soldier being described.

But “Islamophobia is always wrong.  Islamophobia is always wrong.  Islamophobia is always wrong”.  It is a mantra, a conditioning tool, a method for separating people from the effective use of reason, of independence of thought.  Rather, it seeks to conjure a more or less literal knee jerk reaction, in which the MOMENT ANYBODY breaks one of the mantras, or appears to, RAGE flies out of them, which derives from the fear they feel of not fitting in.

The creed of Niceness thus dovetails well with indoctrination and propaganda.  It both suppresses independence of thought, and channels needed emotional releases of anger and “self” assertion.  I keep meaning to post on this, but I haven’t felt that post when I had time, and I lately often have little time.

This should be obvious beyond the need for saying, but the entirety of the Leftist program to “rescue” them depends upon highly racist notions as to their incapacity for taking care of themselves.  Absent the whites, and their care, they are told, they can’t do or be or accomplish anything.

I wanted to share a small anecdote on this score.

I was in a part of town last week where every time I go out to my car somebody hits me up for something.  I was asked to help a man with a trach (who was smoking through his mouth) get his keys out of his locked car.  I was hit up for spare change twice.

Well, as a reversal, this old black man was walking by smoking a scented cigarillo, and asks me if I needed change for the meter.  I told him no, but thank you.  He looks at me with a conspiratorial smile–I had probably frowned at him initially because I thought he too was going to ask for, rather than offer, money–and says “the old man says “you don’t have to like all niggers, just ME.”  And he laughed heartily. I laughed too.  You couldn’t help but like this guy.

And I don’t doubt for one moment that in his life he has been called that name, that he has encountered genuine racism, and that he has had hard times in his life.  But you know what?  Both of my grandparents had hard times too.  They didn’t have to tag racism on top of it, but life was not easy a couple generations ago. Both of grandfathers were beaten regularly.  One ran away at 15.  Both went hungry often.

And what I thought was that black people are resilient, and that the worst thing that ever happened to them is when they trusted white people to look out for them.  White politicians–or even black politicians riding the same gravy train–haven’t, can’t, and won’t do it.  Obama didn’t do it.  Hillary won’t do it.

Just ponder all the rich while people out there pandering to blacks, promising them the moon and stars, and telling them the sky will fall in and the world be engulfed in darkness if they trust Republicans with anything.

As Trump says, 50 years is enough.  If they vote Hillary, they will get what they got with Obama: free phones in a few swing states, and otherwise continuing economic decline, no jobs, failing schools, and no reason for hope.

School choice clearly will make a difference, and I trust Trump to finally bust these fucking gangsters who run the teachers unions at the considerable expense of the children we continue to foolishly entrust to their care.

Here is the thing: I think most reflective people will wonder what would enable and cause a woman to stay with a man who cheated on her as often as Bill did and presumably still does, to the extent he can still get it up.  It must fill her with rage and jealousy and indignation at times.  She must be particularly pissed that now his crimes might in part cost her her cherished Presidency.

Only someone who is conniving and devious and used to be angry all the time could do it, and only in the service of a greater ambition.  And she seems to have hated these women that Bill used, but she herself was being used.  She was his prop wife, who allowed him to present a normal face to the world.  She allowed herself to be used ONLY because she too wanted to become the President.  But it must have often been humiliating.  And women who have been repeatedly humiliated become NASTY.

I think of the Empress Theodora, who began her life as an actress and prostitute.  Later she married the Emperor, and it was her common custom to have her political enemies arrested and tortured.  She like watching it.  I think there is more than a touch of latent cruelty in Hillary. It was implied at the very beginning by how she attacked–how she Gaslighted–Kathy Shelton.  She has not changed.

From the previous link:

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/22/unreleased-impeachment-era-evidence-against-bill-clinton-still-sealed-by-congress/#ixzz4NvELxGHY

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/22/unreleased-impeachment-era-evidence-against-bill-clinton-still-sealed-by-congress/

This is an example of whistle blowing.  Why am I just reading about this now?  It is like all the shit the Clinton’s so skillfully, so deviously, so skillfully hid for so many years is just coming out now, now that we hare a strong leader who is capable of standing up to the corrupt media and corrupt government and telling needed truths.  You get that, all sorts of stuff starts popping up.

You see, the very worst thing that can happen to a whistle blower is that they take a huge risk, and nobody listens.  What if nobody had listened to Edgar Snowden?  How can we know what other stories could have been told but died still born?  And they still get punished, in all likelihood.  Obama’s government, certainly, despite certain campaign lies to the contrary, has clearly work HARD to be the least transparent, least accountable government in at least modern American history, and Hillary’s will be much, much worse.

Our democracy is broken.  Consider this exchange, with a REPUBLICAN:

“’I don’t care what happens. You are never going to get 67 votes,” Schippers recounted the senator saying. “Henry Hyde responded, ‘Well you know you go over there and Dave has information that the president committed a brutal rape.’” 

The same senator, according to Schippers, replied, “I don’t care if you could prove he raped a woman and stood up and shot her dead. You are not going to get 67 votes.” 

Schippers explained, “Well I raise my hand which I was prone to do at various times and said, ‘Senator may I ask a question?’ And he said, ‘Yeah, what?’” 

“I said, ‘Yesterday I saw 100 senators raise their right hand to God and swear to do equal and impartial justice. Are they going to ignore their vow too?’ And he said, ‘You’re right they are.’ And then I said, ‘Well the system doesn’t work.’ And that was that. It was Senator Stevens from Alaska. He’s dead now. God rest his soul.”

That was 20 years ago.  Trump is the inevitable result of this sort of pervasive corruption of ideal, principle, and rule of law.  That Senator cared about one thing, and one thing only: getting reelected.  I have never taken a firm stand on this issue, but I really do think term limits would make it so career politicians have less time to become corrupt, and will in fairly short order have a last term in office where, if they have not been broken, they can vote and speak honestly.

In the same sense that cops get jaded and less attuned to the notion of public service the longer they serve, or tend to, politicians are the same.  Their first term they may come in with high ideals, but endless favors, and quid pro quos, and the need to manage scandals, and the thirst to stay in power all work their way insidiously into their heads.

As I argued a few posts ago, getting “triggered” is actually not the fault of the environment, per se–certainly it is not best viewed as such–but rather a symptom of a type of psychological dysfunction called a reduced “Window of Tolerance”. It is a symptom of identifiable and treatable mental illness.  It is treated through–to use Dan Siegel’s word which I am mildly ambivalent about–Mindsight.

It is treated, to use a phrase I like a bit better, through emotional maturation and the development of greater emotional intelligence.  This is done through introspection, and a mindfulness practice based on sensations, thoughts, feelings and images (SIFT).

But practically, such practice requires emotional openness, and our university campuses particularly are breeding grounds for infantile entitlement, and self righteous anger; and it seems to me that being “triggered” and being a victim of any sort actually creates the illusion of emotional depth.  If someone has suffered then they must be deep, and the people who are “helping” them (creating a codependent sick relationship with them) get to feel like helpers, like compassionate people.  A soft feeling situation is created where everyone gets their need for self importance met, but massive on-going mental health problems are both created and expressed in this dysfunctional dynamic.

I”m all for competent mental health professionals (I will note again what an odd phrase that is, like they are a different species of human) doing their jobs competently.  But I am not for dumbing down emotional intelligence.

In important respects creating “safe spaces” is dumbing down the curriculum–as most curriculums have been dumbed down for many decades now–and simply creating emotionally stupid people in addition to ignorant and incurious ones.

What better mass of people to create the DEMAND for tyranny?  This is the plan.  People who are capable of using freedom want it.  People who are not, who need to be protected from every last vagary of life, and who are incapable of learning and growing, demand complete stasis, and stasis is something totalitarians deliver well.  They will tell them what to think, what to feel, they will feed them, clothe them, and rock them to sleep at night, across the duration of their pathetic lives.

They will put them in jail cells, and be thanked for it.  Those iron bars keep out the world.  Prison is their safe space.  No wandering for them.  They will even be provided pacifiers if they want them.

We are in a desperate fight for sanity, and I wanted to remind any readers I may have that www.prageru.com is a great resource. They have short well crafted videos on just about every topic you can think of.

It is literally the case that before dialogue can even start you have to convince most glazed-eye drones that you are not evil.

It seems obvious, given the climate this year, that many Trump supporters will only admit it to the voting booth.

I am having odd dreams. I am seeing the seething hate of the Left come to the surface as the Headless Ones slowly realize they may lose, but I also see hundreds or perhaps thousands of potential whistleblowers contemplating finally going public. They have been scared and frightened. Obsma has cowed them into submission with threats of legal action, but they KNOW if Hillary gets elected she won’t hesitate to use physical violence, and all her crimes will go unreported and unpunished.

I say: it’s now or never. Do it now and do it en masse. Put the nails in Hillarys coffin or it’s the nails in our democracy. And if you are suspected of dissidence, which will begin to include questioning anything, then you will be purged and punished anyway. Come public. Show the courage Assange and O’Keefe and others have.

These leftist ghouls are the Walking Dead. They are the embodiment of what morally and psychologically normal people fear. They are the enemies of that Goodness Hillary corrupts by claiming. For her a good people is a compliant people, a submissive people.

We can’t let her win this election.

Edit: logistically, what are needed are personal narratives, and supporting documentation such as emails. Breitbart and InfoWars are likely to be most receptive. WikiLeaks may still be accessible too. Every little bit helps.