The basic ethical and professional point to be made is that when a doctor is confronted with an illness, or threat of illness, the HONEST approach is to develop a continuum of options, ranging from the least dangerous/highest potential benefit up to the most dangerous/also potential high benefit, and that HAS NOT HAPPENED WITH RESPECT TO COVID.
If you have a potentially cancerous skin growth, you don’t start chemotherapy. If someone has a sniffle, you don’t start a full round of antibiotics with the strongest medicines available. Chemo has negative health consequences. So do antibiotics, which are on nearly all accounts overprescribed.
These spike protein injections–which are unique in the annals of vaccination in that they do not remain in the arm, which has always been a key condition for safety, but rather circulate freely throughout the body–cannot be claimed “perfectly safe” by any honest person from a position of DATA.
ALL MEDICINES HAVE SIDE EFFECTS. All of them. No exceptions. Aspirin and antihistamines have side effects. What ETHICAL Doctors do is ask for Informed Consent, which means they tell patients the good they expect, and the harm that is possible.
THERE HAS BEEN NO INFORMED CONSENT WITH THESE JABS. Incomprehensibly, from an historical and ethical perspective, they simply DECLARED the jabs PERFECTLY safe–not mostly safe, but PERFECTLY safe–and thus avoided the need to educate anyone about ANYTHING.
This whole thing is a travesty of medical professionalism, and responsible governance, PARTICULARLY since we have simple, safe remedies that arguably accomplish the same goals–less serious illness, less hospitalization and less death–with much less risk.
There has been no continuum, no range of options. It is taking your chances without the jab, or taking your chances WITH the jab, and this despite the fact that empirically well supported treatment regimens emerged nearly immediately, which is what happens when you let a decentralized system comprised of smart motivated people innovate.
All the approaches being tried consist in FDA approved medicines which were ALREADY being used off label for other illnesses.
Ponder that, again, for a moment. My cousin has Lupus, which is not the stated ailment for which Hydroxychloroquine exists. HCQ is a third generation malaria drug, in my understanding–and FDA approved as such–whose immediate predecessor Chloroquine was known by Anthony Fauci to be efficacious in a petri dish at least with respect to SARS-Cov-1.
He has been getting prescriptions for Lupus for many years, taking them to the pharmacy, and getting them filled, year in year out.
And this never stopped. He most likely took HCQ today, and certainly this week. But if a doctor had written him a scrip for COVID, the pharmacy would not have fulfilled it. Same medicine, same piece of paper, different use of a known SAFE drug. Think about it. Think again.
In the largest reaction to a pandemic the world has ever known, a perfectly safe drug was made unavailable even when used under medical supervision, and prescribed by a qualified medical professional.
I see no rational way of entertaining any idea BUT that the whole intent of public policy as articulated by Anthony Fauci, Wallensky, Collins, Redfield and others was to PROLONG AND WORSEN the pandemic. No other premise satisfies the needs of the reality. Nothing else explains rational, intelligent, erudite people acting in irrational, stupid, and counterproductive, ignorant ways.
So not only has a range of options not been offered, not only has the world been made black and white, but alternatives have been SUPPRESSED by outright censorship, personal attacks, people being fired for TREATING COVID, and pharmacies being closed to COVID patients–all buttressed by a general atmosphere of irrational mockery and condescension, none of which makes sense, and none of which would be pursued by well meaning people genuinely seeking what is best for all.
I am attacked daily on the interwebs for suggesting people would be better off if they rectified Vitamin D deficiencies. I say it helps with COVID, which is obviously true. It may or may not equal the jabs in various ways, but within broad boundaries it CLEARLY carries none of the risk, and much of the benefit, and does so sustainably, as long as that person supplements or gets enough sun.
And as I continue to say Vitamin D deficiency is just like Vitamin A deficiency, or Vitamin B deficiency, or Vitamin C deficiency. Bad things happen. Nobody is arguing for Vitamin C deficiency, so how is any of this remotely controversial? Debates can and should happen about what is optimal, but SOME level can be agreed on that goes beyond what is needed to prevent Rickets, say AT LEAST 25ng/ml, with the COVID evidence pointing to zero mortality at 50 ng/ml.
Even if COVID were not happening we should correct this easily correctable problem, particularly in the black community.
How cynical am I? This cynical: I think the political Establishment, writ large, WANTS more health problems in the black community so they can claim racism and use it for more money and power. That’s how cynical I am. Otherwise, how to explain such reckless and blatant incompetence?
We knew in 2012 that for at least part of the year over FOUR IN FIVE black people are D deficient. If they were, say, Vitamin C deficient, and running around with Scurvy, would we not have fixed this immediately? Of course, of course. And Vitamin D is not much more costly than the limes the British gave their sailors. It is certainly less than a lime a day. It’s pennies. Fucking pennies. You can buy a year’s supply for $20-$30. And people are DYING from this deficiency, and not just of COVID.
The world has lost its mind. Our doctors have whored themselves out cheaply. Our nation is being run into the ground by petty bureaucrats. When any or all of you wake up and see what I see, it will make you dizzy