Judicial Watch, in what should not have taken a lawsuit, but did, got this video released of the impact that destroyed a part of the Pentagon. Watch it: https://www.sgtreport.com/2019/09/judicial-watch-sued-to-get-footage-of-the-plane-hitting-the-pentagon-on-9-11-video/
It’s about 4 seconds in. Slow the speed to 25%.
What you see is NOT a passenger jet. It just isn’t. No fucking way.
And as I have no doubt mentioned, people have been poking holes in the story of how the hole was poked in the Pentagon for many years, at least a decade. Here is an article from 2007: https://www.globalresearch.ca/new-study-from-pilots-for-9-11-truth-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/6133
So where did that plane go? That’s a fucking good question. But it did not hit the Pentagon. I have seen claims that no plane hit in Shanksville, either. I can’t evaluate the evidence for that, but will say that ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE IF THE GOVERNMENT LIED TO US ABOUT THE PENTAGON, AND TOWERS 1,2, AND 7.
What I realized the other day is there are now TWO data points I feel absolute confidence in: 1) that Tower 7 was brought down by explosives; and 2) that the Pentagon was hit by a missile, not a plane.
If you connect those two data points then it is absolutely logically necessary that SOME element of our government PARTICIPATED in 9/11. I just don’t see foreign terrorists being able to launch a missile of the size that hit the Pentagon on our soil and going undetected. And obviously, if it HAD been terrorists, there would have been zero reason to conceal it, as was manifestly done.
American scientists and researchers are not stupid. We are good at what we do. We are also just obviously susceptible, seen in the most generous way possible, to political pressures, and likely in the event financial or other incentives.
It has long seemed intuitively obvious to me that some portion of our intelligence/Deep State apparatus participated in 9/11, but if you accept that was not a plane, then it becomes the only tenable explanation.
And to be clear, I remember that time, the idea that if there was a 1% chance of a nuke going off we had to treat it like 100%. It’s not implausible Cheney (I’m kind of joining the Left in some viewpoints, here that his opinions mattered more than the actual Presidents, and of course if he is guilty of crimes then his radical opposition to the moderate but unpredictable Trump makes sense, as did the ridiculous antics of his daughter) and others felt that without a major event that we would never put the needed security measures in place until too late, and that the cost of a few thousand lives was paltry compared to the millions who would die in a successful nuclear attack. You spend a few lives to save a lot of lives.
Look how that has played out. I will say no more, other than to comment that I shared earlier an interview from a year or so ago between Ron Paul and RFK, Jr. He more or less openly says that the reason JFK was assassinated by the Deep State was his decision to pull troops from Vietnam. Some part of them wanted to stay, he implies, which is why they took him out.
If true, how did that end?
And you have to look one layer farther out. The GENERALS, who sincerely want in many cases to protect our country, can easily be stabbed in the back and betrayed, and all their work, and that of all their troops, and all of the men killed and damaged–along with their families in many ways–rendered null and void. Gone. Disappeared. Blow out the match.
But this is not true of defense CONTRACTORS. They made a bundle in Vietnam, and the same with the War on Terror. They not only have no reason to care who wins, but long, protracted wars are GOOD FOR BUSINESS. I’m sure they didn’t invent it–this likely goes back as far as money lending–but this is basically the Rothschild model. They would bankroll both sides, and presumably had substantial investments in the arms industries of all affected nations.
So I’m not on bad ground saying maybe Cheney got bamboozled by his own people, but there is not a fucking thing he can do about it now, but try and prevent its discovery, at least before he dies, which can’t be too far down the road now.
But ponder the ethics of people willing to inflict mass death to make money. Is there any real difference between Krupp when they were making cannons and Pfizer now? It’s a different sort of war, but if you think about it, the rhetoric is much the same, as of course are the outcomes, for them, for us, and for the world.