I think most of us would agree it is wrong and should be illegal to murder 2 year old children. This, even though they are quite often very, very tiring, very annoying, and because we WANT to kill them. I have long said that any parent who claims they have not thought about murdering their children is lying or saintly.
Same with one year old children.
Same with one day old children, children who have been born for 24 hours, who have been fed a couple of times, and presumably held a couple times.
But with a newborn, right out of the womb, it is OK, according to most Democrats today, who want to frame objecting to this as some form of radicalism, as some form of misogynistic, patriarchal control over women’s “bodies”, even though in this particular case the bodies have actually separated.
And ponder this possibility. What if the mother doesn’t want her child, but wants to have it buried after it is killed? What if the doctor tells her that would be illegal, because burying means it would have to be treated as a person, whereas if it is treated as medical waste, it is no longer a person?
What if the method of killing the baby is decapitating it on a little block with a meat cleaver? Horrible? Is that worse than drowning it or killing it through exposure in a cold room (as Obama voted to be legal in Illinois some 20 years ago, in what was then a radical and unpopular position even among Democrats)? What if the baby is just fed into a grinder, to make it easier to deal with as medical waste? Morally, if that is wrong, then all the other options are wrong.
Here is the thing; most European nations recognize that there have to be lines. On this issue they draw them in approximately the right place (even if on most other issues they fail to do so). They say “look, in three months you know if you want it or not. Make up your mind in that time window, and if you change your mind, you have having the child then giving it up for adoption, barring major health problems”.
But the thing is Democrats don’t even want to admit a born baby is a baby. They are pushing it as far as it will go, at least they were until I came along.
Here is my hypothesis: in nearly all cases, Democrats will avoid answering the question as to whether or not two year old have a right to life, and will fail indefinitely to affirm that it is legal and moral to prosecute as criminals anyone who would hurt them.
They have already said babies, born crying, whining babies looking for their mothers tits, are not human, that they are not worthy of protection. Why not extend that indefinitely?
And they KNOW this. That’s why they won’t answer such a fucking simple question. It really is unbelievable.
And BTW, I read this the other day: https://www.infowars.com/sec-endorses-mastercards-idea-of-cutting-off-right-wingers-report/
When I was talking about the Left coming up with alternative, with off the wall shit, to counteract their on-going, necessary, and inevitable failures to defend their ideas or results, this is the sort of thing I was talking about. Back office, whispering, secret cabals. They can’t allow sunlight or air to touch them anymore. It’s proving fatal.