As I understand this, there is no law requiring Electors to render their votes—and I think that is in effect what they are—for the candidate who nominally won their State, but in the history of our country only a couple have failed to.
So if you were, say, a Pennsylvania or Georgia Elector, and chose to vote for Trump because of the obvious fraud, and the obvious corruption and cowardice of our judiciary, youneould be treading new ground, breaking a de facto taboo and long standing hanit.
But history will be made one way or the other. If they fail to stop Biden they will embark on another series of historical firsts: they will help usher into office the first President we already KNOW has taken bribes from our largest global rival; they would help ratify the largest and most blatant national voter fraud ever conducted; and they usher into office the oldest man ever to serve as President, and someone whose mind is already plainly in decay.
A reasonable objection might be made that if this sort of thing became common every national election would get nightmarish.
First off, the President serves four years and can both do a lot of good and a lot of harm. Taking our time to get it right is still prudent even and perhaps particularly in the era of instant and short lasting gratification.
More importantly, the Supreme Court has already ruled that the sundry State legislatures can “bind” their Electors to the outcome chosen by the people, so this need only happen once.
But if it does happen once, December 14, 2020 is the day.
If Joe Biden took bribes and cheated BEFORE he was President, and if all this was known and he STILL became President, what then would or could be beyond possible? If you empower criminals you get more crime. This was obvious no doubt to Hammurabi, and to everyone since who put a moments thought to it.