I just discovered this idea and article, which I will excerpt at length:
“In 2006, at the order of the Bush administration, some computer science programmers with a small group of public health officials began to resurrect a premodern idea of quarantines, closures, and measured lockdowns. This way of thinking is not just premodern; it turned the logic of modern medicine on its head. It was based on a theory that we should just run away from viruses, whereas Dr. Henderson’s whole life had been devoted to implementing the great discovery of modern virus theory that we need not flee but rather build immunity through science, either natural immunities or via vaccines.
“At the age of 78, Dr. Henderson swung into action and composed a masterful response to the new fashion for quarantines and lockdowns. The result was Disease Mitigation Measures in the Control of Pandemic Influenza. Henderson, though listed last, was the primary author along with co-authors Thomas V.Inglesby, epidemiologist Jennifer B. Nuzzo, and physician Tara O’Toole.
“Here is the riveting conclusion:
Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted. Strong political and public health leadership to provide reassurance and to ensure that needed medical care services are provided are critical elements. If either is seen to be less than optimal, a manageable epidemic could move toward catastrophe.”
Is this more or less not what Tegnell did in Sweden? They apparently have high spike protein injection compliance because the Swedes trust their authorities, who did not fuck with them, or change their mind every five minutes for nakedly political reasons.
As people like Martin Kulldorff have pointed out, the disingenuousness, incompetence, outright lies, and continual policy vacillations of the CDC and NIH have caused a very high percentage of Americans to lose trust in those institutions entirely. I have. I trust the National Enquirer as much, and perhaps a bit more, than Anthony Fauci.
This makes all policy recommendations harder to get into place, at least in conditions of freedom, and conditions of authoritarian coercion are going, in this country, to get people shot if they go too far beyond what the Constitution allows our government to legally do.
And as I have pointed out, if you are diagnosed with COVID THERE IS NOTHING MOST DOCTORS CAN LEGALLY DO until you get really sick. In many places they can’t give you Ivermectin or HCQ, and for whatever reason nobody anywhere is pushing Vitamin D and Zinc supplementation, which likely help as late as being symptomatic, although having sufficient amounts at all times is better.
And even though Ivermectin and HCQ are SAFE, and KNOWN to be safe, they were sidelined in really sketchy ways; in my view patently corrupt and scientifically indefensible ways which scream corruption and politics and knowing lies.
And is it not INTERESTING that all this was being gamed out 15 years ago? From what Judy Mikovits and others have testified, the NIH or CDC had all the patents on some of the coronaviruses back then. I think they patented SARS-CoV-1. It’s in this documentary: https://www.thriveon.com/media/plandemic-ii-indoctornation-full-movie
So you have the guy who ended Smallpox more or less anticipating 2020 and calling bullshit on nearly everything that has been done; you have the guy who invented PCR saying it should not be used for medical testing; and you have Dr. Robert Malone, who invented mRNA technology, saying that we need to do a LOT more research on these shots before offering them, much less forcing people to take them.
Oh, and you have the Nobel Laureate who discovered HIV saying the shots are going to make things WORSE, possibly MUCH worse, and you have the fact that the two discoverers of Ivermectin won the Nobel Prize for it, but that it is being called horse dewormer by people who would know better if they wanted to know better.