Informed consent is one of the most basic elements of medical ethics. You, as a medical professional, suggest a course of treatment. In this process, you say why you think it will help, and in what ways, and WHAT THE POTENTIAL RISKS ARE. If the proposal makes sense to the patient, whose life it is both parties are discussing, then the process proceeds. If the patient, being informed of the risks, decides they do not outweigh the potential benefits, then the process does not proceed. The patient walks away, and the doctor has nothing to say about it. It is their life, their decision.
My body, my choice is really an indisputable mantra within this ethical rubric. As regards abortion, though, you are talking about two bodies. As I continue to say, no one disputes the right of a woman or man to keep or have removed a kidney or gall bladder.
Today in my local CIA propaganda outlet, which is to say my iteration of the Gannett network, a local doctor was found willing to say that all children over 12 should get this spike protein injection.
Here is the thing: SHE DID NOT MENTION ANY RISKS.
Have you heard ANYONE, anywhere, mention risks with respect to these vaccines? Fauci? Walensky?
Are there no risks? Of course there are. We KNOW they cause heart problems, particularly in young men. They cause blood clotting. They seem to be associated–along with COVID itself–with miscarriages.
There are number of things we KNOW, and more no doubt that we suspect, associated with these things.
Have you EVER, in your lifetime, seen such an abdication of basic medical responsibility? Without sufficient data to make the claim, doctors EVERYWHERE are acting like these injections are safer than aspirin and multi-vitamins.
This is a BASIC, basic, basic violation of Informed Consent. People are dying, surprised, because the shot is killing them after they were told it was as safe as getting a haircut or getting your teeth cleaned.
Edit: Doctors who know the risks and fail to mention them are violating medical ethics. Doctors who DON’T KNOW the risks–and in reality they and we are being given almost no useful and reliable data– and still use their professional standing to endorse them, are violating basic standards of PROFESSIONALISM, and are betraying a sacred trust. They are prostituting themselves, and in most cases cheaply.
No one can deny these things kill people. ALL VACCINATIONS KILL PEOPLE. The numbers are low, so the math works, and we keep doing them. Since any given shot is unlikely to be the one in a million lottery winner, most parents are not told their kid could die.
But the risks for these things seem to be much higher. What is OBVIOUS beyond any real possibility of debate, is that all the members of what I will call Team Pfizer, and Team Moderna are downplaying and ignoring all negative data. You don’t see it in the media, and if you talk about it anywhere else, you are accused of wanting people to die and of being a “crazy anti-vaxxer”.
Here is the thing: the guy who INVENTED the technology, Dr. Robert Malone, has said he regrets taking the shot, and foresees a lot of problems even in the near term people are not wanting to talk about.
And I have most likely mentioned that when researchers tried to use mRNA technology against SARS-CoV-1, all the animals eventually died when exposed to the virus in the wild.
I assume human immune systems are in some respects “smarter” than those of animals, but could something very like this not explain the stories of vaccinated people flooding hospitals, both with COVID, and with vaccine after-effects?
Again, what is clear is that conversations that should be happening are not happening. Warnings which responsible medical professionals would be offering are not happening. Simple remedies, which we should have tried a YEAR ago, are being ignored when not denigrated.
Psychologically, I will again invoke the Stockholm Syndrome. People I know and respect otherwise are saying “get the vaccine”. Why would they do this? Why would well meaning, reasonably intelligent people do that?
Because they see all the suffering the GOVERNMENT is inflicting on all of us, and see mass “vaccination”–massive compliance with a fundamentally irrational medical campaign–as the only to get GOVERNMENT TO RELAX RESTRICTIONS IT IMPOSED.
The only way out, in other words, is being made through an irrational medical procedure that may well in reality make the whole situation objectively worse, even if in the short term politically better.
The only way, in yet more words, that we can be saved from government is by doing whatever government tells us. We have to appease these tyrants. It is, we are told latently, and we feel on our insides (some of us), the only way to safety.
But of course appeasing these people is no different than handing the Rheinland, Austria, and Sudetenland to Hitler. Nothing is enough.
Science does not deal in lies. Science does not suppress data. Science does not suppress discussion. Science does not censor informed and qualified voices. Science does not exclude a priori viable research paths, and potential solutions. It tests them, them forms an opinion.
Wake up, if you have not yet. It will feel just like it does in the morning: you will be hazy at first, disoriented, but if you persist, eventually you will find your coffee pot, and start feeling the light of day in earnest.