I need to be doing something else, so I’ll make this quick. First, from my Facebook:
Link discussing Joe Arpaio’s committee’s findings.
Were you aware that immigration files in the National Archives recording overseas arrivals into Hawaii are missing from the week of Obama’s 1961 birthday? Or that the clear evidence is that Obama’s alleged birth certificate, and probably his Selective Service registration, was created digitally? Or that Arpaio’s posse can both document newspaper articles in Hawaii at that time announcing foreign …born babies, and that it also found two cases of foreign born babies being “announced” 3 years after their actual birth? The issue is not whether or not Obama can run, but whether or not there are any conservatives with intact testicles. It doesn’t appear so. Fuck you Rush Limbaugh, goddamn narcissistic airbag. I don’t want campaign strategy: if the fucking truth is out there, then intelligent people can make rational decisions, and if we are all stupid, then we are screwed anyway. Do your job right or go home. That’s always been my motto.
I will add that I have no moral objections to anger. It is often counterproductive, certainly, but I would argue that people who are incapable of anger are incapable of goodness. You cannot be a good person if you are incapable of emoting. Likewise, if you constantly indulge yourself that is not good either.
Second link, in which a famous British non-conformist points out the obvious fact that our President has clearly posted a forgery on the internet, in the largely correct belief that the entirety of the American media complex finds it acceptable to be told baldfaced lies to their face.
I want to be clear: I don’t see this issue as a way to sideline Obama. I don’t care if he was born in Kenya. What I care about is: are our public figures capable of making decisions based on principle, with the principles here being not appreciating being lied to, and the illegality of violating the Constitution.
The “natural born citizen” was in there for a reason. It had meaning. It was meant to ensure at least minimal loyalty to the United States, and here we now have a President whose books may have been written by Bill Ayers, a man pictured standing on an American flag on 9/11 in the New York Times.
It’s worth asking, given the recent account given by Ayer’s mailman, that if he were sufficiently connected to provide assurances to Obama that he could be President 25 or so years before the fact, if Ayers and someone at the New York Times did not have inside informatoin on the attacks.
As I have argued–conclusively in my view–there MUST have been explosives at least in Tower 7. Given this, there was a much larger conspiracy afoot, and in my view it was one involving rich left wing activists, possibly with Russian Communist (Putin is still a Communist) support. Why could Ayers not have known of this?
Our Republic is in danger. In my view, the first and primary cause of that danger is cowardice on the part of people who should know better. If you give an inch, you will give a second inch. If you convince yourself that somes truths don’t matter, you have convinced yourself that the Truth doesn’t matter. In some cases, compromise is death.
If we fall, there will be a lot of finger pointing, and most of those fingers will belong to the guilty. Failure, too, is a group effort.