Since the issue of dealing with disasters–and Obama’s possible use of them to grab power–is real world for you, I thought I might pass along a
scenario and some ideas. First, I think many of you share my basic
understanding of Obama as someone who is a political radical.
What you
may not know is that the evidence is very good both that his real father
was Frank Marshall Davis–who was a card carrying Communist Party member through
the Fifties and Sixties, and who on Obama’s own account was an important
mentor; and that his association with Bill Ayers–and Ayers radical
father–likely goes back into the 1980’s, and that Ayers is the most likely
author of both of Obama’s books.
These are my best guesses, based on
the evidence available. It is a fact that a William Ayers has dined at the White
House. Keep in mind, too, that Bill Ayers was featured standing on an
American flag in the New York Times on Sept. 11, 2001, and that back in the 1970’s he dreamed of building a network of concentration camps in the Southwest, and figured in the end he would “have” to murder some 10 million Americans unwilling to submit to brainwashing.
That picture may not
have been coincidence. I deal with the overwhelming probability that there was a larger conspiracy on 9/11 here. I have since become much more convinced that Americans HAD to
have been involved, even though I still see no reason to implicate Bush
or even the government. Keep in mind that the Rockefellers, among others, have long term ties to political radicals, and are among the beneficiaries of the Federal Reserve’s largesse. People forget, but the Fed is currently creating and distributing some $50 billion a month. We have no idea who they are giving it to. There are neither laws constraining them, nor effective means of generating public disclosure. This situation is ludicrous, but I don’t want to digress.
Given the foregoing, let’s say
someone–false flag, or through successful attack by an actual foreign hostile power like Iran–detonates an EMP in New York, causing large regional
blackouts, food shortages, and general chaos. Who does Obama call out?
Not the National Guard: they don’t report to him. He calls out FEMA,
and the Dept. of Homeland Security it reports to. They show up in their
armored personnel carriers, and they tell all the regional Guard units
that they now work for them. He tells regular military and law enforcement that he is now in charge by issuing an
Executive Order,and puts all military, all Guard units, and all local law enforcement under the operational
command of the DHS–which he has been seasoning for this day both through selective recruiting a la Parallax View, and through indoctrination–which most or all Governors choose to honor.
National martial law is
implemented. Gun confiscations go on in force, of the sort we have
already seen in New Orleans (I’ll post a video). At some point, the
government says it can’t care for everyone, and tells them they have to
relocate to camps built by FEMA and the US Army. The camp selections
are not random. Specific people are put in specific places they never
get out of.
In this situation, how is order reestablished
consistent with the Constitution? How does Obama NOT become a dictator,
if all units involved follow orders that appear legal? For all service
personnel, following orders is the default, unless something is
FLAGRANTLY wrong, which it would not appear to be in this scenario.
What
I would submit is that the military, law enforcement, and Guard units represent perhaps our best defense
against tyranny, and that policies should be put in place making it
absolutely, categorically clear that you will refuse to obey
unConstitutional orders, which would include forcible relocations, and
disarming the public. There are not enough America-haters out there to build tyranny, unless there are enough people unwilling to think through the consequences of what they are being told to do to make it happen on autopilot.
Look at this video on actual forcible relocations, and gun confiscations in New
Orleans: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4. Would this be you? Do the actions of these men make you proud? Can you justify them, from the distance of cold, cool, calculation of the nature of your job protecting the public and freedom? Imagine this across the country, led by DHS agents:
If this can happen in America, and it plainly DID happen in America, what did our forefathers fight for? What did you enlist for? What did YOU fight for?
Here is a video on camps apparently being built by the Army which are
described as intended to hold civilians. They are being built,
apparently, in the United States, and are surrounded by barbed wire.
Why the Army? Why civilians? What NEED is there for these camps? We already have prisons. We already have Gitmo. Disaster recovery does not need guard towers and barbed wire and snipers.
Please think through your role in protecting the freedom of Americans in general, and the freedom of those in the State or community you are tasked with protecting. Please ponder carefully what you are willing and not willing to do, and make your principled policies known in advance to all concerned.