The atrocities happening in Iraq were already happening in Syria. That’s probably where they developed their methods. I remember reading about them dismembering a small girl while she was still alive roughly a year ago.
Here is the thing: they evolved very quickly, in less than a year, from a ragtag bunch of sadistic psychopaths, to an ORGANIZED bunch of sadistic psychopaths. They went into Iraq able to do large scale battle maneuvers, something like on the battalion level. It seems obvious they got training somewhere.
It seems likely we provided that training. If we were covertly funding them, and covertly providing arms–some from Libya, and some likely CHEMICAL weapons from Libya–then why would we not have been covertly providing training?
Obama is afraid if he gets too aggressive that they will let the world know this. Hillary Clinton, when she said her major foreign policy regret was not getting our soldiers to fight alongside ISIS, so as to implement an Al Quedist government in Damascus, was tacitly admitting that they did not anticipate them leaving that battle entirely, and creating a large embarrassment–note, neither Obama nor Clinton have any moral compass or integrity whatsoever, and are functionally sociopaths themselves–in Iraq.
And one can legitimately question the whys and wherefores of Obama’s blatant commitment to the Muslim Brotherhood. What is the connection? How deep? How long has it been there?
Obama’s enemy is the Western way of life, and that is the MB’s as well. Perhaps the enemy of my enemy. . . That saying does come from the Middle East, if memory serves.
I will add as well: why is the Middle East violent? Because of Muslims. If you could wave a wand and make Muhammad have died of cholera as a child, it would be peaceful.