It occurred to me that throughout history not all homes have been happy. Not all wives have been glad to be with their husbands, or happy to bear their children. Not all children have been loved, and many resented silently and even hated. I see no reason not to believe this has always been so.
Here, though, is a to-me-interesting-thought (TMIT): what if the role of archetypal feminine, of the compassionate goddess, the female angel, the Virgin Mary, serves to complement and improve the images and feelings which came with childhood for the individuals within that society?
Can we not posit that honest myth, used properly, completes pictures which are incomplete, in addition to presenting ideals, and expressing unpleasantness otherwise not subject to public examination?
I have my own issues, obviously–which I have discussed too much, almost certainly, although if it does me good, and it has, it obviously isn’t too much–but I’m not the only one. This is an interesting thought, which springs from a very specific set of intrapsychic events I choose not to discuss here.