Even if Trump can get to 270 via legislature certified Electors–which seems increasingly likely–we really need a Supreme Court judgement to clean up the system nationally. It has manifestly been going on a long time, and if the burden of proof is on the victims of it to prove there was enough of it to swing the election, it may go on indefinitely. We will call it the Lance Armstrong principle. He never tested positive for any performance enhancing drug ONCE, but he used them to win all his championships.
So did everyone else who beat him. This would be the corollary Lance Armstrong principle: if everyone is cheating, this standard makes sense. But if only ONE side is cheating, if literally 100% of the evidence points only one way, then I think my concept I think I called Affirmative Presumption comes into play, which is that if there is evidence of ORGANIZED, coordinated cheating–cheating the same way in multiple cities and States–then you have to ASSUME that the cheating swung the election, at least for the national candidates, and then award them the election.
That is my personal view, which may not be shared by all. Or any.
But the further point I wanted to make should be easily intelligible and obviously sensible: Voting fraud needs to be labelled, by the Supreme Court, a manifest violation of the Equal Protection clause, making it functionally equal to Jim Crow laws, and thus legally equal to systemic racism, which would be a huge irony, given that the Left continues to tell us we can’t expect black people to be able to figure out how to vote, and that a ballot that has been filled out–by whom, we don’t know, and with what legality we don’t know–MUST be counted or else–wait for it–RACISM. Bullshit. Black people are not stupid, and the data I see is that 1 in 4 who voted legally voted for Trump. To allow cheating is to disenfranchise all those people.
Remember when Mike Pence tried to clean up voting rolls following 2016, when there seemed to be some shady stuff going down? Remember when, among nearly all Democrats, the Kentucky Secretary of State (whose father went to jail, BTW, for election tampering) declared there was “not enough whiskey in Kentucky” to make her share that data?
What was she afraid of? Is it not obvious?
With a Supreme Court ruling, filing lawsuits to clean up voting rolls–to rid them of dead people and people who have moved out of State and convicted felons and people here illegally–would be much easier. The law and morality both would be obviously and clearly on one side. It will be much easier to end all the crap that has been going on in the Machine cities–Philadelphia, New York, Detroit, LA, Atlanta, Pittsburgh and others–for many decades now.
It’s not funny. It’s not a “oh that’s just how they are, ha ha” situation. It’s a serious violation of the Constitution, and of our most important right, that of rendering our opinion in the form of a vote.
Voter Fraud is a Poll Tax that is not payable. It is a Civics quiz which cannot be passed.