It does seem to me that, as with economic models which assume that behavior does not change in response to tax rates–which of course is ludicrous, since people will work harder for two dollars than one dollar–much of the consensus about the future rests upon an assumption that only elites have the brainpower to change their behavior in response to changed circumstances.
I read this MIT “computer model” predicts global decline by 2020. Certainly, the Rockefellers and their ilk likely have the power to wreck just about everything economically. One of their people is always in a position of some influence at the Fed, and who knows what else they control via an extended set of strings. The Fed could cause a Depression tomorrow. Ponder that for a moment. None of them are elected, none of them are accountable to anyone, and we don’t even know for sure who the member banks are. It is classified, or so I read some time ago. The Fed is invitation only, extended via stock created for the purpose, which is non-transferable. This beast is in the heart of our world, and its tentacles on every street corner, every restaurant, every skyscraper, every car, every home, and in the air around the world.
Be that as it may, my view is that if we can shift from a model of happiness and economic output based on mechanized, habitual consumption, to something more organic, more healthful, more natural to how humans have evolved to live, more congruent with “LIFE”, in all the senses of that term, then all these problems disappear. All the problems to which tyranny is the proposed solution vanish, making the essential power mongering and psychopathy underlying what no doubt appears benign rhetoric at times to be revealed as what it is.
All problems are simultaneously adventures. None of this is boring. Far from it.