Deriving Alex Jones

If we might apply the analogies of physics and math to human culture, we might assert that cultural motion, once initiated, tends to remain in motion until acted on by an outside force. Typically that force is some rival claim to power, in some combination with very gradual, nearly impercible evolutions over time, of which might make the example of linguistic evolution stand for all such processes.

Christianity is dead among our elites. The concept of truth, seen philosophically, is dead in many minds and hearts, and only vigorously defended in the sciences, and by those our elites want to call regressive. By conservatives, to be clear, who are conserving the notions of truth and principle based morality.

How could anyone marinated in this post-truth philosophical imbecility NOT want to seize power and suppress dissent?

I personally see no way. If Alex Jones did not exist, we would need to invent. Somebody needs to be saying loudly that we can ASSUME people who believe nothing are capable of anything. This is my own view, and it is revalidated nearly daily.

Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Eric Schmidt, George Soros: their “moralities”, at least in many concrete specifics, are based in lies they tell continually. A “morality” based on lies which endures over time is nothing of the sort. It is something between an excuse and a cover.