With studies having shown zero correlation between lockdowns, masks, and vaccines and better COVID outcomes, there are now 142 studies vouching for the near-perfect correlation between higher vitamin D levels and better outcomes in COVID patients. It is likely the area of COVID-19 treatment research that has the most data behind it. However, a recent German study stands out from all of them because it comes the closest to proving this ironclad correlation to be causation.
Not only did the German researchers find a linear relationship between vitamin D levels and mortality from COVID, they found essentially zero morbidity for those with a D level above 50 ng/mL. The reason this study is so important relative to the dozens of others tracking D levels with COVID outcomes is because it measured the levels months before the patients got COVID as well as after the infection onset. “In most studies, the vitamin D level was determined several days after the onset of infection; therefore, a low vitamin D level may be the result and not the trigger of the course of infection,” note the authors.
This study, however, followed 1,601 hospitalized patients, 784 who had their vitamin D levels measured within a day after admission and 817 whose vitamin D levels were known before infection. As an adjunct to this sample, researchers also analyzed the long-term average vitamin D3 levels documented for 19 countries. The observed median vitamin D value over all collected study cohorts was 23.2 ng/mL, which is considered insufficient. The results were remarkable.
“At a threshold level of 30 ng/mL, mortality decreases considerably,” found the authors. “In addition, our analysis shows that the correlation for the combined datasets intersects the axis at approximately 50 ng/mL, which suggests that this vitamin D3 blood level may prevent any excess mortality. These findings are supported not only by a large infection study, showing the same optimum but also by the natural levels observed in traditional people living in the region where humanity originated from that were able to fight down most (not all) infections in most (not all) individuals.”
Based on these findings, they conclude that people should test their blood levels and supplement to get their levels over 50. Studies have already shown that one is 14 times more likely to die from COVID with vitamin D deficiency
The reality is that most people’s levels are below 30 and many are closer to zero, especially among the elderly population. It is beyond criminal that 20 months into this endeavor there has not been a national campaign percolating down to primary care physicians to test and supplement vitamin D levels accordingly. Think of the numerous benefits of vitamin D — from a healthier immune system and stronger bones to decreased risk for heart attack and cancer — as opposed to the risks of so many of the other things we are harnessing to “fight” this virus. Why on earth would vitamin D not become the new vaccine when it provides more protection against the virus than any vaccine?
I would say I hate to state the obvious, but that would be untrue. What I hate is HAVING to state the obvious, over and over. I’ve been making the case for D since roughly April a year ago, or perhaps the summer, after reading that 80-90% of admissions in a Spanish hospital were D deficient. It seemed like an obvious, easy, and cheap step to take. It is very hard to overdose on D, and in any event if you give people dose ranges, or better yet do blood tests, it is as safe as anything that is medicinal can be.
And this talk, from December 2020, was icing on the cake. I turned into Johnny One Note. And I’ve been touting the Zelenko Protocol since I heard about it maybe 5 months ago, which includes D of course, and adds zinc, a zinc ionophore called Quercetin, and Vitamin C as a seeming synergist. In acute illness, the ionophore is upgraded to HCQ or Ivermectin and antibiotics added, seemingly as an anti-inflammatory, and certainly to prevent bacterial complications.
Here are two questions I’ve been asking for a while: 1) why was the death rate in Finland one tenth that of Sweden? 2) More importantly, why didn’t anyone CARE? You know how Finland was used? To say Sweden had ten times the death rate of their neighbor. But Sweden had LOWER death rates than we did, and do, and they are DONE with this fucking thing. We aren’t, and don’t even get me started on the asshole lunatics Down Under.
How did all this happen? How was all this allowed to happen by our Establishment, writ large? If I understood this stuff, the professionals clearly did too.
This whole thing is a crime on par with the Holocaust. I mean that absolutely literally. I think MORE than 6 million people will, in the end, have had their lives cut short in a variety of ways. Starvation and related illnesses in the poor world will be one. Unnecessary death from this disease is the most obvious. Suicide, drug overdose, and just MISERY. If unemployment kills 40,000 people in the US alone when it jumps one point, what about putting entire populations under house arrest for long periods of time and forcing them to wear idiotic masks? And what is this doing to our children? Do you not expect many of them to grow up as neurotic basket cases, afraid of their own shadows?
The world has been changed by all this. It has been made darker, less free, more odious in most ways. Whatever dance people had in their steps has slowly turned into plodding. There is nothing good or kind on the horizon, unless the masses of people WAKE UP and realize the scale of this atrocity, and GET MAD. I’ve been mad a long time. Join me.