Month: August 2021

https://www.instagram.com/p/CSaR9AYp5li/

As I continue to look at all this, it is obvious the crimes cannot be hidden. A reckoning and mass public outcry and mass disillusionment is INEVITABLE. The suppression of Ivermectin and HCQ ALONE has killed hundreds of thousands of Americans and likely millions around the world.

So LOGICALLY, assuming these people are not stupid—and they are psychopaths, not idiots—the end game must be using hundreds of billions they have made in all this—selling masks, getting monies siphoned from the Stimuli, profits from “vaccines”, drugs like Redesvir, from short selling, from buying up bankrupted businesses for cheap, pulling illicit money from the “Infrastructure” bill etc., etc.—to avoid a reckoning by gaining full control, by turning this and other nations into post-democratic managed oligarchies.

If whatever honest people in power remain do not wake up to this, fight it, AND BEAT IT, future textbooks will only have the Official Lie. HCQ will be mrntioned with derision, as will Ivermectin. Vitamin and mineral supplementation will be replaced by the absolute necessity of expensive drugs.

This global CRIME will be presented as nevessary, and that the only thing w that prevented a more rapid resolution was “anti-science” criminals, who we should all direct two minutes of hate at. It was Goldstein, and Goldstein alone who prevented the heroic government from saving everyone.

I literally believe this is true.

And I was tempted to add they would not LITERALLY use Goldstein, but why not? They would obviously suppress the book 1984 and punish anyone who speaks of it. If Goldstein was a joke within that party elite, why not enact a LARGER, and real joke, perpetrated on actual people?

I continue to wonder why simple things keep getting muddled, not just in spite of, but often BECAUSE of the nearly continual exhortative perorations of our “Experteriat”.

Here is the thing: Herd Immunity is Farr’s Law, which means that in any SINGLE epidemic or pandemic a point is reached where enough people have enough relative immunity that, after peaking at the top of a Bell Curve, cases and deaths diminish and disappear, mostly. The dying and sicking drops to a trickle.

Humanity has achieved relative Herd Immunity eventually in every epidemic and pandemic in human history.

There have been, for example, hundreds ot thousands or tens of thousands of smallpox outbreaks (breaking out from silent presence to active spread and growth), ALL OF WHICH have ended. You may have a bad outbreak which kills a lot of people, thrn ends, then not get another for 10, 25, 50 years, or MORE.

There is no reason to think COVID can be eliminated any more thsn the flu or common cold. It is a pointless and abusive delusion.

People are “vaccinated” manifestly continue to do everything the unvaccinated do. They get sick with COVID. They carry COVID. They DIE of COVID.

So in any given outbreak the goal is to progress to THAT YEAR’S relative Herd Immunity, and to my mind self evidently to do so by teaching everyone to protect their own health by eliminating easily rectified and prevented nutitional deficiencies, combined with protecting the vulnerable and weak.

All of this is common sense, and if I might coin a phrase, Common Science.

All you have to do to deduce pervasive corrupt and perverse intent is look at what WE ALL KNOW TO BE TRUE, then compare that to the heavily depleted and redacted narratives of pur own Faucists.

Scientifically, the public pronouncements look like private memos released under legal coercion by the CIA or FBI. Half of it is missing.

Pride may precede a fall, but it’s also facilitated a lot of climbs and gotten a lot of people off their backs and asses.

Not infrequently, it also precedes excellence.

If Society is the God, and “worshipping” consists in improving that society, then actually improving that society to the point where no problems remained would be to eliminate all possibility of worship and faith, would it not?

Looked at systemically, would not the task quickly devolve into a complicated dance consisting in equal parts plausible positive claims combined with subterfuges designed to suppress unwanted news and particularly long term failures?

Yes, I think this is right.  This is the psychology of the naive.  Obviously, left wing causes also attract opportunists as well, power hungry monsters, and greedy thieves, who never bother to hide their own motives from themselves.

If you look at the history of American political thought, this is the one area where, intellectually, we are vastly better than any nation on Earth.  Not even close, in my view.  We may be a bunch of TV-watching, fat, ignorant fools, but our HISTORY, at least in the realm of political theory and practice, is uniquely compelling.  There is nothing better out there.

Our Constitution is designed to protect us from villains and assholes of all sorts.  Where they gain control in one place, they are to be checked elsewhere, not least by their rivals, but optimally by an informed and participatory citizenry, that in the case of utmost need constitutes an Army capable of competing with that of the government.  It’s really hard to fuck up this system, but we are well on our way.

Abstraction, it occurred to me this morning, comes from a part of the Self that is not the Self.  It’s in a different part of the house, or possibly a visiting guest.

One of my recurring obsessions is how Communism happens.  We know how to live happily.  We know how to create prosperity, and we have forms of political governance that allow everyone to be who they want to be.

And many people value this.  But obviously most of our intellectuals don’t.  Many, many people are deeply uneasy with freedom, with happiness, with a world where people live simple lives, have and raise children, grow old and die in peace.  There is not enough of them in all this, no relentless focus on them.

And they can’t stand this.  The goal, obviously, with the sort of abstraction they push on us is to glory and revel in the attention paid to them through the attention forced on the ideas they identify with.

But this whole thing is an emotional and psychological split.  Any one of us is happiest in the moment, which is the OPPOSITE of abstraction.

It is not natural for any iterated/born/living being to be fully stable.  We are systems in motion within certain orbits and limits, which can be changed with effort.  Stasis is foreign to life.

And yet abstraction–consider math as the ideal, and perhaps the Pythagorean Theorem as the paradigmatic example–is always static, always unchanging.

If you look at abstraction as a snapshot of a moment in time, as it applies to the world, it is healthy.  But when a passion arises to move the world INTO abstraction, with stasis as the goal–as for example has largely been achieved in Cuba and North Korea, which change little year to year, decade to decade–then that is profoundly pathological.

I like the Marvel movies, since they can deal in the mythic in modern times and modern terms.  I really think Dormammu, from the Doctor Strange movie, is a good metaphor for Communism.  Time stops.  Change stops.  Evolution stops.  Perception stops.  Every possible effort is made to turn people into mannequins, to create a stage play with no motion, which never ends because it never begins.

I am musing, but these are perceptions which I have spoken about in various ways over time, and I am very sure there is something here.

Communism, at root, is about an escape from time. It begins in abstraction–in a class struggle which never really existed, and which resolved itself in the end through mutual cooperation to mutual benefit–and ends by trying to suppress everything human in human beings.

Along the way functionally psychopathic people enjoy the pleasures of moral superiority, freedom from the accusation of hypocrisy combined with material wealth and its attendant possibilities, and the feeling of being in an exclusive tribal club.

Edit: obviously, if I posit Communism as an escape from time, then the fear of death easily follows as an underlying unconscious motivation.  I have likely mentioned a friend of mine from high school who once commented that he wanted to live forever through socialism, through the work he put into building a “better”–as he inchoately imagined it, through what were no doubt many inaccurate and incomplete ideas–society.

I’m sure I have quoted or at least referenced William James, in the first few paragraphs of this first lecture that was published as the book Pragmatism, saying that one’s first metaphysical premises are not only relevant to being understood as a person, but that nearly everything else is irrelevant.

Obviously, he is speaking of one’s REAL, not pretended, beliefs, but I think he is absolutely right.  People who think individual extinction is permanent will tend to want to find meaning in something outside of themselves, and in general the first thing they do is invent a new god called “Society”, into which they can pour what would have been a soul if they had one.  That, or pleasure.  Self evidently, Socialists not infrequently–perhaps indeed routinely or even habitually and universally–combine their work for the God of Society with hedonic pursuits made possible by the loot their political crimes have won them.  Hollywood is filled with rich sybarites, who are mainly interested in the pleasure of consuming unearned moral virtue.  They might well say “I may not BE a good person, but I PLAY one to perfection.”

To my mind, and I repeat ideas I think worth repeating, obviously, we need to get to the bottom SCIENTIFICALLY of what happens when we die.  It is an empirical question, one with mountains of well gathered data already, and one ripe for an effort equal to that which put us on the moon.  I would argue it is vastly more important.

And, again, the reason so many scientists, who should be passionately curious about all things which can be described in systems of measurement and observations of many sorts, reject such work is that THEIR religion, their escape from death through abstraction, requires NO CHANGES to the foundational catechism of materialistic absolutism, even if that creed is empirically weak and vulnerable to many good criticisms.

I read all this, and what I am seeking for myself is this: the spirit of play.  Playing with ideas, playing in the barren wastelands, playing in howling winds, unafraid, curious, bold, moving.

I will quote a poem I like to quote from time to time in the next post.

Here is what I think is a good question: if the Left doesn’t need any evidence to call someone a racist, why would it need evidence to push a political agenda in any realm of human activity?  Why would they need evidence and data to support masks?  Australia, to support full Fascism in the face of the deaths, maybe, of a dozen people, while giving heart attacks and strokes to hundreds or thousands?  More people could easily kill themselves in this Nazistic orgy of control than died of COVID, or than could be plausibly claimed were saved.

Why would such people ever need ANYTHING to justify themselves?   Power means never having to say you’re sorry, right?  Power means never needing to listen to opinions you don’t want to hear.  Power means no one ever questions you, for any reason, without the severest consequence.

We literally have white people calling black people racist–a white publisher just called Candace Jone’s memoir “racist”–and doing everything just short of calling conservative blacks “uppity Negroes.”  Justification?  They don’t need no stinkin’ justification.

And here is a debate question.  Use a Lincoln-Douglas format.

Resolved: the teaching of Critical Race Theory will do more to advance the well being of persons of color in this country than any other possible activity or approach.

The way I look at that the question itself is vaguely farcical.  I am a debater.  I did LD debate (and by the way think it should be required somewhere along the way, in college if it’s not done in high school, because you have to represent both sides and it teaches awareness and flexibility), but if you put it this way, does it not become obvious that advancing black folks and CRT have NOTHING in common?  It is narcissistic masochism among whites, and there really isn’t anyone else.  There are some token blacks, but it’s basically white people talking about white people.  To shorten: it’s talk.  And it’s talk that is not even trying to become smarter or more agile.  It’s talk designed for domination in the pursuit of punishment, not elevation.

I hope we get through all this with our freedom intact.  There are going to be some great books on this collective psychosis.  But for now, a large segment of the world is batshit insane.

Two weeks to stop the spread is becoming two years to stop freedom.

I will mention again the test case, the control case, the national counter-experiment, of Sweden.  They never wore masks, and are not going through another round of COVID now.

They have handed out a lot of vaccinations, but what I will suggest is that in the year when they remained open most of them were exposed to COVID and acquired natural immunity which is doing vastly more now than the Spike Protein injections.

No one who says your immune system cannot fight this disease off, and to some greater or lesser extent remember it, is telling the truth.  The WHO had to modify its own long held position for COVID specifically.  This was a lie, a planned lie, an egregious lie, and a criminal lie.

It was identical to Anthony Fauci, in March 2020, stating the position that ALL medical scientists had held for 50 years or more (Camus wrote in “The Plague” in 1948 or so that they knew then masks did nothing to stop the plague), which is that masks don’t stop viruses, and then changing it on a dime without A SHRED OF NEW EVIDENCE.

All of this consists in politically and greed motivated crimes against humanity.  I literally think there needs to be what would amount to a Tribunal at the Hague (or elsewhere) for Crimes Against Humanity.  Children are starving in Peru and Bolivia.  They are starving in India.  In nearly all the poor countries the world over, those who barely had enough to eat before now don’t have enough to eat.  This can be laid at the feet of Anthony Fauci and the WHO.

I don’t know how to communicate how horrifying this image is that I have of what is being done.  It is a crime of global mass murder, that could easily exceed in a few years what Mao did to China in 20, and do so WITHOUT ANYONE REPORTING IT in the lapdog, complicit media.

Even now, I find it very hard to get accurate numbers.  Nobody wants to talk about all this.  The governments themselves don’t want to talk about what they have done to their own people.  They just want the poor to go die quietly and in a corner somewhere, like sick dogs that die under the porch.

Horror is the word.  Anti-Human would be another.  Sociopathic, another.

I sometimes feel like I have some influence, even if I most likely more like Tom Hanks thinking he took out the tank at the end of Saving Private Ryan.  Still, pew, pew, pew-ing seems salutary for me, even if an objective observer might find much that is ridiculous and absurd and comical in me.  So be it.

Communism, so called, is really just another name for some SOB or group of SOB’s controlling everything.  It’s kingship.  It’s emperors.  It is the Church of Science; and being a Church, it has found it necessary to abuse actual science and make many issues that are actually open to empirical improvement and study, closed doctrinally.

When the CDC or NIH declares the “science settled” on, say, these Spike Protein Injections, they draw on a long history of “scientists” simply swapping their lab coats for ministerial garb and declaring certain things to be TRUE, which only heretics and unbelievers would dare question.  That science is NEVER settled, in principle, and that this is known to be an incontrovertible aspect of the philosophy of science is simply ignored.  They simply ASSERT that science CAN be settled, and that anyone who doubts it is a bad person.

As I say, we should fund studies of the continuation of life after bodily death to the tune of tens and perhaps hundreds of billions a year.  It is a critical question.  The life choices of every person on the planet are informed, consciously or not, by their conception of context, which is to say if this is a one off, and forever disappearance, or if everything we sow here continues to pay dividends infinitely, or at least for an inconceivable length of time.

Psi is already being studied by many governments.  It has practical aspects, even if the people using it for bad things fail to recognize the philosophical importance of these things, and what they mean for our notions of what it means to be human, and by extension how each of us should spend our lives.

That wasn’t my main point, though, although reading back it perhaps needed to be said.

The people who put Biden on the throne are doing all the things that Communists do.  The goal, if you want to be a king, or run an oligarchy, and make serfs of the world, again, is to control all aspects of social life.

You need to control the media, which is to say the stories told in public.

You need to control elections, to secure your power, if you happen to live in a nominal democracy, which values that particular ritual, which can in any event be preserved in form, as indeed it was–and even still is–in most totalitarian regimes in the 20th century, from Iraq to China.

You need to control the medical system.  Consider that the CDC is being trial ballooned with the power to issue economic Diktats, as for example the power to tell landlords their tenants should not have to pay rent.  That would have been inconceivable to me, that anyone would buy that, until it seemingly happened.

Here is the thing: sometimes you just have to tell people to go fuck themselves.  If I were a landlord, that is what I would do.  And I would assume that around here, that is what has happened.  You would need left wing judges to uphold that sort of thing, which attempts to have the power of law, without having involved any legislature, or even any Executive in any State, and to be imposed across the COUNTRY.  It is making laws without any reference to the political system whatever. Unbelievable.

You need, of course, to control the police, the judiciary, and the Army, writ large.

Ideally you control the roads and bridges and rivers and sea ports.

You optimally control the schools, such that you train people to accept the idea of Lords and Ladies, provided such royalty uses the right words, like justice, and peace, and promises to “save the environment”.

If you go down this list, the Democrats are trying to check off every one, and have indeed accomplished many of them. I’m not taking the time to point out the obvious ways all this is happening, but will comment that making the whole military submit to the shot will almost certainly shake out many decent and honest people, and obviously political pressure has been on our nations police forces for some time.

One wonders how any AMERICAN could be so stupid as to support all this tyrannical behavior, but as I talked about a while back, I met a retired Army Colonel who checked all the boxes to be on the Biden team.  And he was a middle school teacher.  I would not have thought that possible until I saw it.  Then you have people like Milley.

I don’t get it.  I don’t think I ever will.  I am often an asshole, but I will never be THAT sort of asshole.

I recollect reading how Fannie Mae got a patent perhaps 15 years ago to shut of the power remotely in homes they owned.  This level of control is something a cabal has been seeking for a very long time.

Freedom in the United States is in serious trouble, and that trouble is exacerbated by the imbecility of much of our populace, such that the propagandists were able to convince a good third of the country that the very people trying to protect our system constitute the biggest threat to it.

Why are the Bidenistas worrying daily about an armed rebellion?  Because morally one is warranted.  They lie and cheat.  They are doing everything in their power to completely destroy our system of law.  They are abusing us, by locking us down, forcing experimental medical treatments on us.  You know the list.

But in my own view it all boils down to logistics: most cops and most soldiers, when push comes to shove, will most likely follow orders, and so the question is what good violence might accomplish.  What attack?  Why?  To what end?

And consider how much the Left and their lapdog media made of January 6th, where people rightly angry with massive fraud that was ALLOWED even by most Republicans–when not facilitated outright, as perhaps happened in Georgia and elsewhere–were first attacked by the police, and then ushered into the Capital, most likely following Agents Provocateurs, some of whom may have been FBI agents.

There were no guns.  There was no violence, except that directed by police against unarmed protesters, and including at least one blatant murder, and another that happened passively through police abusiveness.

If there WERE guns somewhere, it would go on 24 hour loop, and Biden–rather, the people behind Biden–would get the pretext they needed to start the final dissolution of all rule of law, all barriers to power grabs, that they have long been seeking.

As I have said, they WANT violence.  I won’t say it’s part of their plan, but it would be highly welcome news, and I guarantee they already know what specific and immediate use they would make of it.

So I just look at all this.  From my seat, there is nothing I can do.  And I know I’ve expressed these rough ideas before.  Violence is not the answer, but doing nothing means a slow shrinking that will not end until people like me are in jail, or officially marginalized and silenced in some less overtly abusive but morally equal way.

This post is my contribution.  Maybe somebody else can look at these parts and come up with something.  SELF EVIDENTLY finding the evidence I have no doubt is everywhere as to blatant voter fraud–and most likely destruction of evidence–would be a good start.  That is a good use of the system, and for my part, I wonder daily why so many people who should know better seem to be playing the parts of drooling morons, with the only alternative explanation being participatory corruption.  Well, and simple cowardice stemming from a lack of principle.  That is what you get in decadent societies.

We don’t live in End Stage Capitalism.  We live in end stage civilization.  We are decadent, in many, many ways.  Nothing is truly sacred any more, for far too many of us.

I think of Brazil, which I will continue to insist is the closest dystopia to what we actually are seeing, where Pryce is told by the receptionist, I think it was, “Don’t hold out too long, or it will affect your credit rating.”  We are damn near there, and damn near literally.

Give me a world that’s not falling apart, and I can perhaps help lead us into something better.  But the primary aim right now is to not fall into darkness, which is where we live now, with much worse both possible and on the way.