Categories
Uncategorized

A Global Immunosufficiency Campaign

The more I think about this, the more absurd this whole vaccine thing seems to me.  It’s a global Beta test.  Yes, like software developers, they have done some testing, and ironed out some obvious problems.  But you cannot substitute time in this process.  The worst effects may take two years to START showing up, at which point it will be much much too late.

If this were the ONLY way to get out of all this, then the risk may be worth it.  But consider that every evidence is that if we eliminated zinc and Vitamin D deficiency this disease would also likely stop killing people, and we could reopen normally without overtly terrifying the many millions of cowards among us.  The dying would stop, then we reopen.  They can’t ask for more.

And compared the cost of the development, manufacture, distribution and end purchase of these vaccines, we could get 5 years worth of zinc and Vitamin D in the hands of every man, woman and child in America, and likely most of the planet.

Why then are we taking a risky, expensive approach without trying a very safe, very economical approach, particularly when the risky, expensive approach only works with one disease, and the safe, cheap approach works with ALL infectious diseases, as well–in the case of D–depression, osteoporosis, and other disorders.

Pick your conspiracy.  You can choose more than one.  But do not be a fool and attempt to rationalize this.  The best possible, least cynical, explanation is simple incompetence and thoughtlessness, and those are bad enough.

 

Categories
Uncategorized

Propaganda

If you think about it, propaganda is a form of demagoguery.  It is abusing the sentiments and minds of ignorant people, in order to manipulate them towards selfish ends.

And this is not lessened by the fact of the patent self deception practiced so assiduously by so many acolytes of the left wing cult.  Those at the core are near-conscious, and I think in their ranks are many cynics who are open to their own corruption.

It’s an ugly mess, as I say in various ways on various days.

And I will add that right now the social propaganda being foisted on those who have lost all other sense of purpose is serving to undermine their sanity yet further, distance them yet further from the shores of their own culture and history; and drown yet more thoroughly their capacity for reason and principle, or return to anything approaching mental and emotional health.  All this, towards hellish ends.

I will comment that I listened to Hamlet last night.  My prose always gets a bit, oh, let’s call it lyrical, or dramatic, or overwrought, or perhaps vaguely comical in excess, when I listen to Shakespeare.  He warrants many readings.

I have ideas on Hamlet I may share soon.  I think I understand his dilemma quite well.

Categories
Uncategorized

The normalization of fear

Texas and Mississippi recently reopened fully.  I think this is long overdue, but welcome.  Obviously, it is reasonable to suppose both cases and deaths will go up, perhaps by a lot, in the short term, but that the long term history of epidemics indicates that the numbers will drop reasonably quickly, and a stable condition achieved in which deaths drop rapidly, and largely end.  This is the prediction of Farr’s Law, which was described long before vaccines had been made reasonably reliable and generally available.

Here is the interesting thing: a think a LOT of people are afraid not that it will not work–that all the catastrophes Fauci keeps warning us about will happen–but rather that IT WILL WORK.

What sane person would not want a return to prosperity and normality?  The answer, obviously, is in the question.  None: that is the answer.

What I would like to propose is that what this pandemic has done is make a de facto virtue out of cowardice, and the cowards of the world HATE the idea that they might have to go back to freedom, to a larger palette of choices, and that the rest of us will not be stuck at home like them, like they CHOSE to do long before any of this happened.

And I think it goes even deeper than that.  This is a focal fear, a fear around which many fears cluster.  It is the fear which drives out other fears, and one which is manageable by very simple measures: you just wear your mask, socially distance, and yell at anyone who fails in doing these things.  Do those things and the world becomes safe, sane, manageable.

But this is ludicrous, is it not?  But ponder the background.  We are seeing already AI deployed for common uses.  We are seeing increasingly intelligent and capable robots.  We have it drilled into our head that there is a “climate crisis”, even though none of the predictions made have been accurate, and even though the science was never very good.  We have social division and collapse.  Our public culture is decaying–rather, faltering under relentless, maniacal and obsessive attack.

Everywhere you look, the thoughtful person sees danger and uncertainty.  It is hard to manage emotionally.  What I want to propose is that this pandemic makes this fear much easier for weak minded people to deal with.

And perhaps I should not even say weak minded.  This stuff really is objectively scary.  None of us can really know where all this is going, or feel much faith in the people who have secretly (really, not so secretly any more) appointed themselves our guardians and the custodians of our future.  Most of them seem to be amoral psychopaths who are quite willing to do unto us, but not themselves be affected in any way by the same things they are imposing.

And the longer you hide, the harder true awakening becomes.  You are behind, and the whole thing, taken as a single dose, is utterly overwhelming.  Part of the reason I write so much is to try and process all of this.

(I have, by the way, dozens of posts stored up, which I will make at some point; my own anxiety drives me to continual though).

But here is the question: WHEN we reopen, what then?  What will be left?  How can people who have suffered so much terror daily for a year now ever hope to return to the relative innocence of last year?

We have to do it, though.  Sometimes you have to tear the bandage off.  Each will deal with it in their own way.

I wonder every day if my destiny is to be murdered.  That may be the case.  And that frightens me.  But as I have no doubt said often, losing my soul frightens me much more.  I don’t really have a choice.  If I am to live the life God made for me, I have to do my best to be bold.

Categories
Uncategorized

And more

We were told, and are being told, that the only way to prevent mass premature death from COVID-19 is to hunker down in our homes and wait to be vaccinated. Two weeks to “flatten the curve” has become, a year later, a never ending event.  Even when we are all vaccinated, we may need to accept a “new normal” without cheering crowds in sporting stadiums, loud music in crowded bars, or actors performing live in local theaters; and generalized and compulsory mask wearing everywhere and indefinitely.
What if all this is a lie? What if, to put it more scientifically, these claims are empirically much weaker than those made by qualified experts—equal in academic qualifications to the leaders of the NIH and CDC–which say that most of us should resume normal life, the world over, do it NOW, and that LESS PEOPLE WILL DIE if we do so?
As stated in a previous email, qualified experts from Stanford, Harvard and Cambridge Universities, in the Great Barrington Declaration (easily searched) have claimed precisely this—that those at low risk of death should go back to normal living RIGHT NOW—and that the bulk of evidence is that those at higher risk can rejoin us in a few months, particularly after having been vaccinated. Grandmothers who are dying now of loneliness and heart break can see their grandchildren again soon. All of us can and should raise a toast in a crowded bar to the end of the lockdowns, school closings, and mask wearing, and do so by July 4thAT THE LATEST.
In this email I want to make 3 claims:
1)  It is plausible and very empirically defensible to claim even now that the absolute death rate from COVID-19 is around that of the flu, and among the young even lower.
2)  We need to wage a national campaign to eliminate what I term “Nutritional Immunodeficiency”, which will CERTAINLY reduce deaths from most infectious diseases, including COVID-19.
3)  Nations with death rates orders of magnitudes lower than our own, which have not and cannot do most of the supposedly “necessary” things we have done, NEED TO BE NOTED, DISCUSSED, AND STUDIED.
The author is an intelligent layperson, more or less collating publicly available facts, and THINKING about them. I am not an expert by any means, but it seems obvious that even though MANY EXPERTS DISAGREE WITH THE POLICIES WE ARE BEING TOLD TO FOLLOW, they are being silenced. They get no media time, and in many cases, as with “America’s Frontline Doctors”, they are being censored to the point where they cannot post on any social media, and their videos are pulled from YouTube, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, and others.
In discussing death, the first obvious fact is that, not only do all of us die, about 2.8 million Americans are EXPECTED to die each year. If it is true that 500,000 of us have died of COVID-19—I don’t believe it is, but let’s suppose—then 2.3 million people have died of SOMETHING ELSE in the past year, most of them in effect of old age and poor health.
Adding nothing, put this way, it seems to me the ridiculousness of what we are doing is obvious.
But we have all read the terrible stories of people struggling to breath, of the long term organ damage, the smiling youths with bright futures stricken down in their primes, of the HUGE number of deaths we are avoiding with all this, so some more attention may help enlighten the matter.
Death rates, as normally calculated, are the number of known cases divided by the number of known deaths. It is a ratio, however, which grows larger quickly when you increase the deaths and decrease the infections. It likewise shrinks quickly when you do the opposite, as I believe we should.
It appears BOTH that deaths are being overreported, and it seems very clear–certainly at a minimum both plausible and empirically defensible—that many more people are exposed to this virus, and fight it off without trouble, than ever test positive for it.
Without getting deeply into methods, it is CLEAR that the CDC itself issued guidelines which made overreporting likely, by asking that all cases where COVID-19’s involvement was suspected be reported as COVID-19 deaths. “Cancer with COVID” deaths are being reported as COVID deaths. Heart attacks. Stroke deaths. Even motor vehicle deaths. A 5% at most COVID/95% something else death becomes a 100% COVID death in the statistics, even if the disease only shaved a week off of someone’s life, if that.
While it is true that an acute illness—any acute illness, including COVID-19—could be the one factor that causes death proximately, in the otherwise sickly, adding all those numbers to the totals makes it difficult or impossible to gauge how much of a danger this disease represents to the otherwise healthy.
The flu pushes tens of thousands of our elderly over the edge every year, and has for many years, but few pay it any notice, because it is not relevant to THEM. The young and healthy, in general, need not fear death from the flu (even if it does happen, rarely).
And most hospitals and medical centers have had enormous financial stress put on them by all this. They can’t see most of the patients they would have seen in a normal year, so financial stress alone is enough to stimulate overreporting—effectively, to be clear, overbilling with tacit permission–and indeed some doctors have stated publicly that they were under pressure to “code everything COVID”. Hospitals get vastly more money for COVID deaths than for, say, run of the mill heart attacks.
How exaggerated are the numbers? I don’t think anyone can say for sure. But it is conceivable they could be a tenth of what we are being told. How much more common is exposure to COVID than reported? It could be ten times what we are being told. Roughly speaking, numbers in that range have been found in several studies, studies which were done last summer, and ignored completely by most of the media and Establishment Experts (when they were not attacked bitterly.)
So obviously if we divide the deaths by ten (or 2 or 5), then multiply the number of people who have been exposed by ten (or 2 or 5), we get MUCH smaller numbers than are being reported. I am not saying we should do that—I don’t know—but my point is that neither does Anthony Fauci. He cannot know all the details. No one does. We have to guess how many people would be alive now but for COVID-19, and how many have inhaled the SARS-CoV-2 virus, developed an immune response, and never noticed or known.
Corrections of some sort in the down direction are clearly needed, though, in my view.
And we know, and have known for many years, that deficiencies in Vitamin D and zinc make most infectious illnesses more easily spread and more dangerous. Adequate levels of both are needed for optimal immune function. Precise numbers are impossible to come by, but best estimates are that on average about 1 in 5 Americans are Vitamin D deficient (this number is presumably higher in the winter, and lower in the summer, since the skin makes D on sun exposure), and about 12% are zinc deficient, or were supposed to be in the most recent study I could find from about 10 years ago.
Both of these percentages are much higher in the elderly. Zinc deficiency may run as high as 40% in those over 65 or so.
Further, D deficiency is also more common in the obese. D is a fat soluble vitamin, and the more body fat carried, the more diluted it becomes.
And most of the people dying are the elderly, and the obese. Generally speaking, if you hear of a younger person dying of this disease, they were likely moderately to severely overweight. Not invariably, but it is a good guess.
And we KNOW that low levels of zinc are highly correlated with poor outcomes in those infected by COVID-19. I would suggest you search “Zinc Covid-19”.
And while it is true that taking more zinc or Vitamin D will do little or nothing if you are not deficient, there is every reason to think that among those who ARE deficient, they can and will in many if not most or even all cases make the difference between life and death if they get infected.
In my personal view, almost no one who is not D and zinc deficient will ever become SERIOUSLY ill. I have known about 30 people who have had COVID (I have not: I am sure I’ve been exposed, but never had a days symptoms), and not one had breathing issues or anything worse than a bad flu. Most of the people I know, though, are educated enough to take multivitamins, and that may be enough to stave off deficiency.
And reducing national Nutritional Immunodeficiency to a rate of ZERO—nobody anywhere lacking in the basic vitamins to ensure optimal immune functioning—would almost certainly not just reduce death rates from SARS-CoV-2 exposure, but from nearly ALL infectious diseases, including flu, which seems in part to be a seasonal illness since Vitamin D deficiency is a seasonal illness. This is an empirically defensible claim, in any event.
Finally, I wanted to point out that India, with a population of about 1.3 billion, much or most of it in severely overcrowded, unsanitary living conditions, has only lost about 150,000 people to COVID-19. America, with a population of 330 million or so—about a third that of India—has lost more than 3x more people. We have about 9x more death than a nation unable to do most of the things Anthony Fauci said were necessary. No doubt some wealthier areas shut down, but overall doing “social distancing” and lockdowns, and closings of various sorts just were not possible for them.
And their pandemic appears nearly over. As mentioned in a previous email, Farr’s Law stipulates that epidemics come in Bell Curves. When you see a Bell Curve, and deaths dropping, then you can safely assume that wave, at least, is reaching its end.
If you do a search on this, you will see the usual suspects of “contact tracing” and the like mentioned, but how could such a thing work when India has some of the most crowded slums on the planet, like Dharavi? If inclined, please search “COVID Dharavi American thinker” for an interesting article from many months ago. How and why are they so much more successful than, say, the UK, which is in a much better position to enforce all measures?
That their death is so much less it requires another explanation entirely should, in my view, be obvious to all.
And in central Africa, the numbers are yet another order of magnitude lower.
Uganda, with a population of 46 million, reports 328 deaths from COVID-19 as of mid-February, 2021. That is one person in 140,000. America, to be clear, is, at the 500,000 supposed deaths mark, at 1 death per 660 Americans. Our death rate is 212 times higher.
Ghana, with a population of 31 million, reports 505 deaths.
The DRC, with a population of 91 million, reports 690 deaths.
To be clear, the disease APPEARED. It showed up. But very few people died, even though most experts expected the disease to run through their crowded cities like wildfire. Yes, the governments banned most mass gatherings, restricted travel, did “awareness” campaigns, but none of this was exceptional, and most of these people are very poor, and unable to stay home and wait indefinitely. We can assume most of them were out and about continuously through all of this. The lockdowns and waiting at home are options only possible in extremely wealthy (compared to most of the world) nations.
So, if you don’t know this, WHY don’t you know this? Is this not a reasonable question?
A big part of the answer appears to be the use of anti-malarial and anti-parasitic drugs, specifically Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine. You may have opinions on the latter, but if you are unfamiliar with the details of the Surgisphere/Lancet scandal, what you think you know is probably inaccurate, or at least severely incomplete.
I will discuss those in a future email.
I will note that India has made zinc supplementation a key part of its response as well. This is an OBVIOUS remedy, and as I say it is inexplicable that we are keeping children out of school, isolating further already isolated elderly, and in many cases effectively putting people on house arrest, all without making even a token effort to issue guidance on obvious and safe palliatives.
If 20% of Americans are Vitamin D deficient, then that is about 66 million of us. If 12% of us are zinc deficient, that is about 28 million of us. That is a lot of people to suffer from an easily corrected problem in the middle of a global pandemic. Pills are cheap. People just need to know to take them. If they were pushed with the diligence of mask wearing, compliance would be very good.
So please ponder all this, and please forward this email to anyone you feel may read and consider its contents. By all means research all the claims made here, and form your own independent and nuanced conclusions.
Categories
Uncategorized

More

About one year ago this month, the music stopped.

This is more or less literally true: most music halls and concert venues closed, and have remained closed.  As Van Morrison and Eric Clapton, among others, have pointed out, a lasting and deep wound has been inflicted on those whose business is providing live music for cheering crowds.

Playgrounds became silent.  Parents were told their children could not play outside—that it was dangerous–and schools—being shuttered—had no screaming and laughing kids outside at recess any more.  This is no longer universally true, but all too accurate in far too many places.

Many museums in much of the world remain mothballed, and many will not have the resources to reopen, if and when allowed to.

We were told then, and are being told now, that it HAS to be this way.  There is no other option.  We are being told by the public face of this Big Idea, Anthony Fauci, that things may NEVER return to how they were in March, 2020.  We will never enjoy the same freedom again; never return to the high levels of optimism and prosperity we had then.

I ask: why?  Why not?  The fear of mass death?  I would like to explore that idea a bit more, and talk specifically in this email about two medicines in use pretty everywhere BUT the richest nations of the world.  I think the statistics show pretty clearly that none of this is necessary.  I will deal with vaccines and masks in a future email, but for now I would like to discuss Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine.

This email is sent by an intelligent person very concerned about current events, and very eager to return to the old normal as quickly as possible, something that is in my view easily in the realm of the possible at this very moment.  I am a student of history, and very concerned that whether this email is understood and acted on or not, that it is vital for the future history of this time that we describe it, NOW, as accurately as possible.  In the era of smart phones, the memory of most seems to not extent back much more than a couple of news cycles.

Here is a question: if I told you five years ago that in 2020 a highly infectious, dangerous disease was going to affect nearly every nation in the world, where would you assume the most mass death would be?  I would have guessed the slums in the largest, most densely populated cities of the world, places like Karachi, Dhaka, and Cairo.

Karachi has a population density of just over 24,000 people per square kilometer; Cairo about 19,000.; Dhaka 23,000.  Dharavi, a locality in Mumbai, India crams 277,000 people into each square kilometer of its area.  New York City, by comparison, is 27,000 per square kilometer, and is the most densely populated city we have.

The United States has one of the most advanced, best funded, and best organized healthcare systems in the world.  And we are very wealthy compared to India, Egypt, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Who should have more death?  Is it not obvious?

Here is the problem: NEW YORK CITY ALONE HAS MORE DEATHS THAN THE NATIONS OF PAKISTAN AND BANGLADESH PUT TOGETHER.  New York, on their official website, reports, as of March 1st, 24,350 deaths with positive COVID-19 tests, and another 5,058 probable but not tested, for 29,408 total.

According to the WHO official COVID Dashboard (search WHO COVID Dashboard and input the country you are interested in) 8,408 people have died of COVID total in Bangladesh, and 12,860 in Pakistan.  Egypt reports 10,688.

New York City has a population of about 8 million.  If I divide that by 25,000 I get 320.  1 New Yorker out of every 320 has died of COVID.

Pakistan has a population of about 225 million.  Bangladesh 165 million.  Egypt 103 million.  493 million total.  Total deaths attributed to COVID-19 are about 32,000.  Divided out I get 15,406.  1 person out of every 15,406 in these nations has died of this “terrible” disease.  New York—one of the most prosperous cities on Earth—has a death rate fully 48 times that of poor nations which contain large slums which in many cases lack basic sanitation, clean water, and any ability to “social distance” whatever.

Is it possible the numbers are severely underreported?  Of course.  But by that much?  And if this disease were really the quasi-plague it has been made out to be, should they not be stacking bodies in the streets by now?  Do you really think that would go unreported, unremarked upon?

I cannot of course say for sure what is making the difference, but it is PLAUSIBLE and empirically defensible to say that some or much of the difference has to do with the different protocols these nations are using, specifically the early and liberal use of Hydroxychloroquine, and/or Ivermectin, often in tandem with zinc supplementation.

Without getting too far into the weeds, all these nations clearly made HCQ a key part of their responses.

And if you look up c19study dot com you will find a resource listing all of the studies and metanalyses showing that when given early and in reasonable doses HCQ appears to be very effective in combating COVID-19.  It is NOT effective when given late, which is to say when someone is already having trouble breathing to the point they enter the medical system.  Yet, this is the scenario which was used for nearly all the criticisms of this drug.

The data clearly seems to show that by the time someone NEEDS a doctor it may be too late for HCQ.    But if everyone takes HCQ when they know they have been exposed, or at first onset of symptoms, it seems to perform very well.

Now, if you have followed the media, you will likely be familiar with the claim—one repeated by Anthony Fauci—that HCQ causes heart arrhythmias.  This is, in my understanding, (do your own research) empirically unsupported, when this drug is used the way the data suggests it should be to deal with COVID-19.

This drug is an anti-malarial drug.  It is an improved version of quinine that was rolled out in 1955—66 years ago.  It is literally related to the tonic in tonic water.  Tonic water contains quinine and was a way for the British—particularly, in my understanding—to get their quinine while imbibing their nightly gin in the malaria ridden regions of their Empire.

In my understanding—and I am repeating what I read—HCQ has always been available by prescription only in the United States, because we don’t have malaria, and the other more or less off-label uses—arthritis and lupus—both benefit from the direct participation of a doctor.

But it is THOSE people—those taking HCQ regularly for years, under medical supervision—who suffered from the heart arrhythmias, or so I understand.  In most of the world HCQ is available over the counter, and is somewhere between vitamins and cold medicine in terms of how it is treated.  People in malarial regions make it a routine part of the lives, and have for many decades.  It has no doubt saved millions of lives over the years.

And here is what should make your jaw drop: right when COVID-19 hit, and Donald Trump was touting HCQ, and right when groups all around the world were beginning trials, a FAKE STUDY was pushed on the Lancet—before this scandal the most prestigious medical journal in the world, or so I am told—which caused most or all existing studies to be stopped, and the WHO to recommend against HCQ use.

Who would do such a thing?  Who would push fake data regarding a potentially potent cure or at least palliative, when doing so would cause much needless death, if a valid remedy could in fact have saved a great deal of life?

I will leave you to answer that question in your own way.  The company with the fake data—or perhaps to be more precise, the “unverifiable” data–was called Surgisphere.  I don’t think the obvious questions have been answered, or ever will be.

But is it not REASONABLE to assume that Egypt and Bangladesh and Pakistan and India (mentioned in a previous email), are doing something smart?  Looking at the numbers, you would assume they are the smart, efficient ones, and we are the bumbling clowns.

I will also mention another seemingly very good medicine, called Ivermectin.  It seems to directly short-circuit one of the mechanisms the virus uses to increase its ability to replicate, by preventing the virus from entering the cells.  So I read on Drugs dot com.

Please look this medicine up.  You will see little bad about it and much promise.

Here is my final point: when you have a medicine with few side effects and little danger, and a strong potential for good, as reported by licensed and credible doctors treating actual patients, there is every reason to try it, and no good, ethically defensible reason not to.  That is not a call for a two year double blind study.  It is a call for IMMEDIATE and WIDESPREAD use.  This point is obvious to all but the morally deranged.

Please consider what I have said, and forward this email as you see fit.  Most people don’t know most of this—it just occurred to me myself today to look up the nations around India, as well as Egypt—and THEY SHOULD.

I want music and live theater back, specifically, the sooner the better.  I am also tired of seeing the sad looks in all the servers I see when I go out for a meal or a drink.  They are suffering.  Billions of people are suffering, in their own ways, from all of this.

Please do your own digging.  Question all my claims.  Spend an hour validating or attempting to disprove everything claimed here.  I am not claiming to be an expert, merely a very concerned spectator watching what in my view is a completely unnecessary global calamity.