Categories
Uncategorized

Social Distancing

I was standing at Target today, on my designated marker (whoever makes those must have done well in all this), and it struck me that this pattern might well be getting ingrained in our muscle memory and in our unconscious.  When all this lifts, where will hugs and physical touch fit?  Almost none of this was necessary, but much of it may be lasting.

And then it struck me that if I was plotting to take over the world, that creating social schizms, and increasing net social distance and sense of alienation and disconnection among the target population might be a key goal.  You would want to prevent self organizing systems from forming, prevent bands of people getting together to oppose you.  You would want everyone shaking in terror at home in front of a glowing light through which you feed them each day’s thoughts and fears.

Then it struck me that we are really talking about PHYSICAL distancing aren’t we?  That is the goal?  To be physically distant?  Then why is it called SOCIAL distancing?  I guess you aren’t supposed to visit your friend’s house, but the theory is that if you did, you would stay 6′ apart.  That is how it is iterated everywhere I’ve seen it mentioned.

All of this is very interesting.  I’m aware of this whole Q thing, but I’m not willing to place too much faith in it.  It could equally be a PsyOp conducted by the aspiring conquerors to create some degree of control over people who might otherwise already be out shooting people.  I’m not saying that’s what I believe, but I am saying it is possible.  Anyone who creates their own opponent can control the course of the game.

But there is not and never has been any empirical data showing that keeping a a 6′ distance is any better than mantras or throwing salt over your shoulder to prevent disease.  I have seen it alleged that it was literally originally the idea of a 6th grader in a science project.  I would buy that, although I haven’t seen enough evidence of that claim either.

As often as science is invoked though, it is distressingly obvious how little science has to do with any of this. 

Science did not dictate we shut down our society in a way no society every has before.

Science did not dictate we wear masks that appear to do nothing where viruses are concerned.

And science does not exist to any extent, as far as I know, with respect to the recommendation of physical distancing.

It’s a shit show.  My hope is that people are waking up.  That seems to be a valid hope.

Categories
Uncategorized

New England Journal of Medicine

We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.

From here: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372?fbclid=IwAR0B5-8ux-MLcrA00tHlvrf3NIDNnsRyezr7WgCqSK4_voyKSRpzw-76cK0 

Categories
Uncategorized

Shunyata

might be translated as “omnipresence”.

What sparked this comment is I was contemplating that every step towards Collectivism is a step away from personhood, from conscience, from personal agency, and ultimately away from the possibility of authentic spirituality.  It is a journey in the direction of true nothingness, where the Buddhists “Void” might as easily be seen as the ultimate somethingness, merely one without defining marks.

And on this account it is certainly true that many religions have served as de facto collectivisms.  Probably all of them, to some extent or other, here or there.

But a blind and dehumanizing commitment to political ideology today is no different than an all encompassing religious fanaticism in any other era.

And to my mind, the salient feature of both is not the atheism of the former, or the supposed theism of the latter, but the obtuse blindness of both.  Reality works the way it works.  Changing fads do nothing to alter this.

Categories
Uncategorized

The alternative

A criticism made of “capitalism” by its critics is that “everyone is selling something. Everything is for sale.”

And of course we think of dumb people in bad suits pushing infomercials.

But, really, what is the alternative?  NOT selling something, because you have nothing to sell? That is penury, if you cannot even sell your labor.

Or not being ABLE to sell something, because it is prohibited? This is slavery, is it not, if your needs are met by those doing the prohibiting?

One can produce and not be greedy. One can sell and not be crass.

We are surrounded by voluble fools, many of them educated in the process of learned and earned ignorance, and not of the good sort.

Categories
Uncategorized

The Null Hypothesis

I am bombarded on all sides by claims and counter-claims.  I listen to everyone, up to a point, so it is all very confusing.  I can see clearly the appeal of an All-Encompassing Heuristic–like religious or political dogma–in order to make sense of it all.

But really, we have to consider that NOT ONE PERSON ON THE PLANET has it all figured out.  None of them.  None in history, none writing today.

But a great many of them have parts and pieces figured out. 

This sort of approach both requires and develops the Fundamental Openness the Buddhists talk about, which in the Zen iteration often gets called Beginner’s Mind.

In Signal Theory terms, in order to make sure you don’t miss any of the actual signal, you have to allow all the noise.

Categories
Uncategorized

Question

If time is money, what is money?
Categories
Uncategorized

Emphasis

I was doing my Wim Hof breathing (more on that in a moment) just now, and it occurred to me it is really a momentous insight that not feeling felt can trigger traumatic reactions, particularly chronic low level amygdala activation.

A social environment can feel dangerous too, can’t it?  We get triggered by fear all the time when facing new people or hostile people, don’t we, most of us?

THE AMYGDALA IS SOCIAL.  That just hit me.

Now, I’m a dabbler in all this, in many ways.  I’ve read a couple books, which I’m not even sure makes me a credible Ama-teur, lover of something.  I would like over time to do much better.

But ALIENATION EQUALS CLINICAL TRAUMA.  I personally was physically abused (hit) and emotionally neglected (by and large not on purpose, but through lack of capacity on the part of both parents).  Those are traumatic, and happening before age 4 or so, also things which constitute Developmental Trauma.

But if you are an average American from an average family, where everyone had a computer and TV in their room, and where your parents were working most of the time, and where your friends grew up likewise mistaking social media for emotional connection, then you are chronically traumatized by every day and every contact even with your “friends”.  They don’t know what they are missing, and neither do you.  But you are unhappy and anxious.

No wonder rates of depression are through the roof, despite this being the easiest and most decadent way of living ever seen on Earth.

Specifically, I was thinking about how easy hate is.  Hate, as I see it, is a mixture of anger and shame.  It is the flip side of a felt need for hyperconformity.  One sees both, of course, in totalitarian regimes.  Nazis hated the Jews (and gays and Gypsies, and by and large Slav, etc.).  Communists hate the rich, “class traitors”, the middle class, and all genuine Republicans in the old sense of the word of anyone valuing freedom and a government confined by effective law.  They USE both the words Republic and Democratic, but they are lies.  Obviously.

Slavish conformity is an internal turning of distress.  Hate is an externalization and projection of it.  And this, really, has to be the sociological roots of Trump Derangement Syndrome.  It would be one thing to roll your eyes at him, or to disagree with his policies.  But they take it so much farther than it is really not unreasonable to see it as a sort of publicly (and no doubt privately) expressed mental illness.

Literally, at this moment, large segments of the people triggered by Trump would support the institution of a national Fascist government, to “stop” him from, I don’t really know what.  The whole thing makes zero sense rationally.  It is pure emotion, and to the point, pure trauma driven by emotional superficiality and the extent to which people have forgotten how to connect honestly at a deep emotional level.  It’s a lost skill, among so many.  We–and I’m guilty of this too–grow up playing roles, wearing masks, becoming who we think we need to be in a given social context.  If everyone else does that, it is lies top to bottom.

A comment on Wim Hof.  I really like the breathing (which basically consists in multiple rounds of hyperventilation alternated with breath holding).  It gets me high.  Interesting insights will often pop in my head, and it is very relaxing.  Functionally, hyperventilation is the primary tool of Holotropic Breathwork, as combined with vivid and excitatory and then calming music (and occasionally some human touch, framed as bodywork).

The cold, though, I have mixed feelings about.  Now, I grew up in a physically cold place.  I have body memories of standing at a bus stop when it was still dark and ten degrees below zero.  When it is that cold the air has a feel.  Sounds carry more easily, but it feels like there is a steam of silence flowing up from the ground.  I remember it well.

When you face that sort of cold daily for long periods of time, you pull inside a bit.  You become more emotionally reserved.  You have to.  It’s a truism that people up North are less warm than people down South, the world over.  They are less expressive, more intellectual.  This varies widely by person, obviously, but by and large the dominant climate does affect peoples emotional tone and sensibility in what seem to me clear ways.

I don’t have any doubt that cold exposure is good for most people.  I think it constitutes a de facto assault on the vagus nerve, which wants things neat and orderly and regular.  When you first do cold exposure, you lose the ability to breath for a moment.  But over time your body learns this is not the danger it thought it was, and reacts less.  This is the calming effect of cold exposure.

But it feels to me there is something cold about this emotionally.  We all want to feel warm, wanted, no matter where we are from.  Russians want to feel warm and wanted, but they often settle for the warmth of drunkenness.

Cold exposure is a way of muting your natural need for emotional warmth.  I read somewhere (here is one link) that people who feel lonely take more warm showers, since physical warmth seems to serve, emotionally, as a poor substitute for human warmth, of which the most obvious example is physically being in someone else’s arms, as in hugs, sex, and sleep.

Now, I did Wim Hof’s latest course.  He is a goof.  He is not someone whose social presence and emotional skill are conspicuous, to say the least.  Having said that, I think there is ZERO doubt, none, that he has saved a lot of lives.  His methods have prevented we will never know how many people from killing themselves.

But what he helps people do is reach an accommodation, a healthy addiction, something to get them through.  They mute their loneliness through cold exposure, which is a sort of insulating tonic.  But it is not a cure.  And of course the Wim Hof Community, seen broadly, IS a help.  It DOES breed human contact, which is good.

But I continue to believe we can do much better.  We are social animals.  Cave men and women lived in caves with each other.  Now we live in caves alone, with the flickering fires of TV’s and computers which lend precious little warmth.

I still have my plans, but the more I grow, the more mistakes I see, the more wounds I see, the more blind I realize I have been.  I don’t want to do anything until I have crossed the river myself.  And to be clear, that means figuring out how to calm myself without vampirically sucking someone else dry through my sheer need.

I have the tools.  I am perceptive–God has given me a good mind, and I’ve done what I could to develop it.  And I am making progress.  And part of my progress, I think, it realizing that not only can’t I save everyone, I can’t even save one person, if they are not willing and active participants.  It is not really my fault if I see countless people making, daily, what I see as stupid decisions.  The creation and maintenance of boundaries is a big part of my task.  Compassion must have limits defined by wisdom.

Categories
Uncategorized

Thought

As individuals or societies transition to more abstract ways of “viewing” the world, anxiety is bound to increase, since there is no end to possible, abstract, theoretical dangers, which our physiology can and does react to in much the same way it would to actually present danger.

This is the main difference between us and animals.  Animals only react to what is actually there, or to what they reasonably suspect to be actually there.  The same with people whose lives do not demand large amounts of daily abstract thinking.

And of course if you take someone given to abstract speculation, and give them an internet, which is in the main filled with bad news, at least where reporting is concerned, it’s no wonder so many of us have de facto anxiety and other affective disorders.

I’m reading a book called Fearvana.  So far, it is not knocking me off my feet, but it is always good to hear the old in new ways.

And it precipitated the realization in me that I have a deep seated fear that if I’m not out fighting on the internet every day, the bastards will win.

Don’t laugh.  You are ridiculous too, in your own way.

Arguing on the internet feels like a way of exerting control.  It feels that way.  But the claim that I make a difference really doesn’t stand up to much scrutiny.

And in any event, taking a break for a month or two, or even a year or two, can’t be all that bad. It’s important to me that Trump get reelected, so I’m sure I’ll be doing my thing in my neck of the woods, but whatever happens, I need to back off all this, and let this fear and this driven compulsive behavior go.

And I think neurologically, I am triggered all the time.  The fight or flight or shame is triggered when I wake up, and shuts down only reluctantly and after attacking me several times when I go to sleep.  Fighting on the internet gives me a way to ground it.  The fight comes first, and the reasons only after.

I continue to make slow progress.  A turtle’s progress.  But daily, step by step.  It’s the best I can do.  I am very sure of that, and doing much less would be much less difficult.  I hope to find the light one day.  But it is many many miles down the road for me.  So be it.

Categories
Uncategorized

Comment

An “age of partial attention” is almost by definition an age of neuroticism and anxiety.

Partial attention breeds superficiality.  Superficiality breeds anxiety and fear and alienation.  Anxiety makes attention even more difficult, making this a vicious circle.

It remains an open question how and why we are so stupid when surrounded by so much potential information.  The answers are sundry, but relate to how we relate emotionally to the world, not intellectually.  Our ideas, in the main, are what rise up after all the other action has already taken place.

Categories
Uncategorized

Dream on courage

Since I’m writing about dreams, I thought I might share one more I had a month or two ago.

Somehow (most dream stories start like that, don’t they?) I was a soldier.  I came on a group of other soldiers.  Somehow we had split a city block off and were on top of it, charging into a battle.

I asked one of the soldiers who was in charge, and they said “you are”.  It took me a second, but I processed this.  Then I looked at where we were going, and realized most of us would die, so I sorted out the chain of command.  I asked “when I die, who is in charge?”, then “when he dies who is in charge?”

And when I said “when I die” I felt no fear at all.  There was no emotional charge at all.  I had a job I was going to do, period, and my dying simply was the cost of it.

This was a sort of courage I have never felt.  Normally I’m adrenalized.  Normally I am excited when I do something scary.  That wasn’t present with this.  It was absolute calm clarity and focus.

I take it as a sign of growth.  You can’t be scared of everything forever.