Well done, Donald. Now start running some damn ads.
I do want to emphasize another idea I had in a previous post: Trump needs to point out that, whatever other failings he may have, he has ZERO history of telling the sorts of big and blatant lies that Hillary and Bill have all their lives. Bill was impeached for lying. He lied about Monica Lewinsky, about Paula Jones, about Gennifer Flowers. Hillary lied under oath to Congress, and would have lied under oath to the FBI if they had PUT her under oath. She lied about the server, she lied about Benghazi, and she is almost certainly lying about her health now.
It’s crunch time. If Trump loses this election, the sociopaths in the shadows win.
Is there really any difference between, on the one hand, attacking a 12 year old girl with the claim she was ASKING to be put in a coma for 5 days and rendered unable to have children, and telling Juanita Broaddrick that, “look me in the eye bitch: we appreciate ALL you do for us. Do you hear me, you fucking cunt: keep your fucking mouth shut, or it’s over for you and your business.”, which is what Broaddrick plainly heard. And it worked. She kept her mouth shut for over 20 years, and was upset and angry when she got dragged against her will into the spotlight in the Paula Jones case.
No. There is no difference. And I would point out that in the case of Bill Cosby he too was a man with a lot of influence and connections. It took a long time for the flocks of women to start appearing and testifying. And the situations were much more ambiguous: they were administered drugs and woke up hazy and unsure exactly what had happened. Clinton raped at least Broaddrick, but there is no reason at all to assume that was the only case. There are likely a dozen or more women watching the news in fear, terrified that if they come forward and Hillary wins, they will face retribution. Remember: Broaddrick testified only when she had no other choice.
Look at Kathleen Willey. I posted within the past week or two not just her account of threats of violence, her tires being slashed, pets disappearing, but an account of Christopher Hitchens speaking on the topic after having lunch with the guy who runs the dirty tricks campaigns for the Clinton’s, Sidney Blumenthal., who convinced him with his tone and words that Willey was speaking the literal truth.
Who else has faced threats of violence?
And we need to remember the Clinton body count as well. Snopes says, well, you take any public figure and there are bound to be some unexplained deaths. Really. Try it with Trump. They won’t be able to do it. Has he had multiple business partners kill themselves prior to cases involving him?
I don’t have time to look at all the cases, but let’s take the case of Mary Mahoney, from this list, which is alphabetical: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.php#axzz4Mc5Qf200. She and her two colleagues were gunned down “execution style”. They found a fall guy, but she had bullets in her from two different guns. One guy does not use two different guns. She was shot five times: “Mary was shot in the chest, her face, and in the back of the head.”
That is vastly more than needed to stop someone. Neighbors heard nothing, which implies silencers were used. She had been an intern in the White House, and prosecutors had said someone with the first initial of M was about to testify. The convicted shooter has recanted his confession, which he says was obtained under coercion.
Then you add the killing of Eric Butera, who was a drug user who said he had overheard people talking about the Starbucks slaying. He was sent to the house, a crack house, to buy cocaine so the police could execute a search warrant, but he was ambushed and beaten to death by parties unknown. Who knew he was coming? Why didn’t they send an actual undercover cop? The abuse was so blatant, it resulted in a million dollar settlement to his mother.
Snopes, to be clear, does not come CLOSE to resolving the red flags in this case.
And obviously in cases where the person died, no resolution is possible. One example is Suzanne Coleman, who reportedly died of a gunshot to the back of her head, and who was seven months pregnant. No autopsy–much less investigation–was done. Snopes accurately states that no connection could be found between Clinton and her other than that he was her law professor. But we know Bill is a sex addict, and that professors are often targets of female attention, and that at that stage of his career having a child out of wedlock in Arkansas would have been an enormous political liability.
At root, we have to ask a simple question: based on the histories of Bill and Hillary, is there any evidence of the sort of caring and compassionate personas that would make politically motivated assassinations impossible? We know Hillary laughed about gaming the system in her rape trial. We know she laughed about the brutal murder of Gaddafi. We know NOW that she caused that war as a result of a personal vendetta.
As far as Bill, watch this testimony, and tell me this is a standup guy: https://youtu.be/ClfpG2-1Bv4
Trumps problem is that he always says what’s on his mind. It is a liability when he speaks too much truth. But what he has NEVER been accused of is being dishonest. He brags and boasts, and yes he embroiders the way most of the best sales people do, but he does not tell calculated lies the way the Clintons blatantly do.
In my own view, this is obviously a dangerous time, but the path is open for this whole thing to be turned to an advantage. The whole discussion can be turned in ways the Clintons will not like and cannot deal effectively with. They are career criminals and low lifes. Hillary kicks women when they are already down, and Bill chases every pussy he sees. He always has, and continues to. She knows this perfectly well.
Trump needs to stay calm, but to be blunt and on point. He needs his lines of attack mapped out, and ready. He needs to have a list of points he needs to make, and rebuttals when Hillary throws back her well rehearsed lies and feigned outrage.
This is an opportunity. Whether Trump uses it as such will dictate if he wins the Presidency or not. If he is SERIOUS about winning–and he always says he is–then now is the time.
Yes, of course the complicit whores (someone always willing to sacrifice the sanctity of mind and body for a price) of the media will support her, but particularly in the debates, Trump can make his case directly to the American people, most of whom are ignorant of virtually this entire segment of the Clinton’s sordid story.
To grab a woman by her pussy is a logical extension of this. It is a metaphor, not a description of fact. Nobody ever physically grabs another man by his balls.
Again, there exists ZERO evidence that this man, who has had a high public profile for a very long time, and very large fortune eminently suitable for attacking with lawsuits, has actually engaged in any of the behavior described on the tape. He has plainly cheated on 2 wives, but he has never hidden this. Trump is very open as a person. He is gaudy and sometimes tacky, but he is what he is.
There is no Trump body count. There is no long list of lawsuits, allegations, and charges. There ARE brags about his prowess, and “locker room” banter, but again, contrast this with the complete absence of such words from Bill, despite his plain guilt.
Again, it is Bill who lied about Monica Lewinsky, about Gennifer Flowers, about Paula Jones. Those three have been confirmed. It seems quite reasonable to believe that he lied about Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, and others. He lies. Hillary lies. That is what they do.
Most Americans, and specifically most women, do not know these stories. They have been buried by the press. They falsely assume that if something is a big deal, it will be 24/7 news on all the major network. Indeed, most likely gauge the importance of a story by how ubiquitous it is, which is how the media manages to make mountains out of molehills. They also make molehills of mountains.
It has been unclear what the effect of bringing Bill and Hillary’s many crimes related to women into the light would be, but since Hillary drew first blood, I think it is perfectly reasonable for Trump to go on the attack.
We need to be clear: even though the major issues are immigration, sane foreign policy, sane economic policy, and the integrity of the Constitution (set to be shredded finally under Hillarys’ Supreme Court picks, if we fail), the REALITY is that most Americans are fucking imbeciles, and that specifically the college indoctrinated women are an important demographic, and this issue will not die for them unless it is reframed.
The framing needs to be Hillary’s own personal war on women, starting with her attacks on a 12 year old rape victim, and continued with her defense of her husband despite knowing who he was and is. (I read even now he has a private suite in his Presidential Library in Little Rock, where he likes to invite pretty interns to drink wine and give him foot massages; presumably he can’t get his dick up any more, or he’s on hiatus until Hillary gets elected, under pain of getting his balls cut off).
Here is a definition of enabler, from Wikipedia:
In a negative sense, “enabling” can describe dysfunctional behavior approaches that are intended to help resolve a specific problem but in fact may perpetuate or exacerbate the problem.[1][2] A common theme of enabling in this latter sense is that third parties take responsibility or blame, or make accommodations for a person’s harmful conduct (often with the best of intentions, or from fear or insecurity which inhibits action). The practical effect is that the person himself or herself does not have to do so, and is shielded from awareness of the harm it may do, and the need or pressure to change. Enabling in this sense is a major environmental cause of addiction.
We need to be clear that Bill was and is a sexual predator. By all accounts he is extremely charming, and makes the woman feel like the center of the world. Bill is clearly a narcissist, clinically. Here is one description of the Idealization phase of a relationship with a narcissist:
From here: https://ladywithatruck.com/the-3-phases-of-a-relationship-with-a-narcisist/
During this phase a narcissist is very loving and is on his/ her best behavior. A narcissist can be extremely charming and loving, which often makes a person fall head over heels in love with them or feel they would be crazy to not love them. In the beginning I felt my ex cared for me more than I cared for him but I had never been loved like that in my life and that is very hard to walk away from. I was perfect in his eyes, to quote him, “Don’t ever change, I love you just the way you are.”
Compare that to this account, from here: http://nypost.com/2016/10/02/inside-the-penthouse-shenanigans-at-bill-clintons-presidential-library/
“Bill is always flirting with the women at the library. He knows everybody by their first name and is incredibly kind and generous. When he talks to you, it’s like you are the only person in the world. I always called him Mr. President, naturally, but one day he looked at me with this horny look and said, ‘Call me Bill.’ I sort of knew then that I was in.
Here is the problem: Hillary has facilitated Bill’s attacks on women by not forcing him to stop. She has, on the contrary, seemingly been the one to threaten them, to cajole them not to talk. She has made sure that in all but one or two cases (Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky, and perhaps Gennifer Flowers) that there were no consequences to Bill of any kind. This is enabling, and in this particular iteration of it, this has meant that many, many women have been treated like objects by Bill, used, abused, and cast away.
Bill is not different in principle than the 41 year old man who led a gang rape of the 12 year old. She made excuses for him, too, and got away with it. One could, in some respects, view this as a template for her whole career, one built on lies, the destruction of enemies, pervasive vindictiveness, and obsessive careerism and ambition.
And I really think as the main architect of the war in Libya, which has destabilized the region, empowered Islamic Fundamentalists, and caused the deaths of thousands, if not tens of thousands, she should be held accountable. Here is a one summary from a group I would likely not normally agree with: http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2016/03/03/libya-how-hillary-clinton-destroyed-a-country/
But it gets worse. http://www.teaparty.org/hillary-killed-libya-peace-deal-personal-vendetta-claims-whistleblower-190073/
She had a SIGNED DEAL that promised elections, and she nixed it.
If we elect this fucking sociopath, and her narcissistic husband, we deserve all the fucking hell that is coming our way.
The risk of failure, at this juncture, was nominating Donald Trump for President. Obviously, he is hard to predict. However, he was the only one with the balls to fight the good fight. Everybody else who eventually developed opinions was following him. (I don’t include Rand Paul in this: but without Trump’s money and fame and instinct for survival he was always going to get sidelined by the same power elite whose attacks Trump has miraculously endured and countered).
Thus, in my estimation everyone else was CERTAIN to let us down.
Trump may yet fail, but he also may yet take this setback and turn it into a massive opportunity. This opens up a whole new ballgame, because Hillary went there, and Trump is not a pussy, and Bill is actually the predator they are trying to paint Trump as.
It would likely be good for Trump to get a bunch of women to testify as to his character, including his ex-wives, with whom he, in my understanding, maintains good relationships.
This pervert had 21 telephone numbers for Bill Clinton, including the phone number of his assistant.
Then there’s this:
According to court records, Clinton “frequently flew” with Epstein aboard the investor’s private jet from 2002 to 2005, the year news of the police investigation of Epstein was first reported.
During the early stages of that probe, cops surreptitiously collected the trash from in front of Epstein’s Palm Beach home. The refuse included documents with the names of some of his many underage masseuses, as well as an Amazon.com invoice for the purchase of sex slave books like “SlaveCraft: Roadmaps for Erotic Servitude–Principles, Skills and Tools,”“Training with Miss Abernathy: A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owners,” and “SM 101: A Realistic Introduction.”
Here is the deal: if they want to put Trump on trial for being a typical, powerful man–note, I’m not condoning or excusing this, I am simply trying to get someone elected who is not trying to destroy the Constitution actively–then Bill Clinton–who will occupy the White House, whose actions have been tacitly condoned by Hillary, since she has stayed married to him despite knowing full well who is he and what he is capable of–goes on trial too. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
And as I said, unlike Clinton, Trump has never been sued for sexual harassment. There is that 13 year old girl some Leftists like to talk about, but both the criminal complaint and lawsuit have been repeatedly dismissed: http://www.snopes.com/2016/10/03/rape-lawsuit-refiled-against-donald-trump/
Trump does seem to have known Epstein, but he knew everyone. Bill is the one who was a frequent flier on the jet.
My personal take on Trump is that he has long had an eye for the ladies, but that in reality he was soft, charming, courteous, and kind. I suspect he underplays this because when dealing with men he likes to be seen as macho. That is the source of the trash talking heard on that recording. He just wanted to see Billy Bush’s eyes go wide. Many women like and have long liked Trump. Bill is the one who goes around, and has long been reported to go around, grabbing women’s genitals.
I remember reading about how Clinton and Vernon Jordan would regularly go golfing even when Bill was President and talk about pussy. That is the word they used in the stories back in the 90’s. It surprised me then.
