Posted here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3249892/Corbyn-s-conspiracy-theory-9-11-attacks-manipulated-make-look-like-Osama-Bin-Laden-responsible.html
It’s been several minutes, and it says the comments are unmoderated. Comment won’t upload, as usual. That’s why I copied it.
The Daily Mail always gives me trouble. So does Salon. So too do DailyKos and HuffPo, Media Matters, and others I forget. Being worth censoring has to be a good thing, right? And feeling the need to censor is a reliable indication of anti-Liberal tendencies, is it not? Fascistic tendencies? That would be my argument. Of course, I can’t make it with them. Daily Kos even has a lynching feature, which is just one of the many charms of that lovely site.
There can be no question both that explosives were planted in all three World Trade Center buildings (yes, 3: most people do not know about Tower 7 because the media made it disappear), and that the official government investigation did not follow standards investigative guidelines, and reached what in its own report it admitted were incomplete conclusions. They did not preserve evidence, and did not test for explosives, despite many hundreds of reports of people hearing explosions.
Who did it remains a mystery, but the only people who had access to the inner core were working for an elevator company which has not been, but could still be, investigated.
Some 2,200 architects and engineers–including a number of high-rise architects, structural engineers, demolitions experts, and fire safety experts–have called for a new investigation. You can read about them, and the problems with the official story, here: http://www.ae911truth.org/gallery/evidence.html
Edit: I checked back this morning, and this comment never appeared. I had two comments disappear this morning from The Atlantic.
Everyone needs to remember that in a digital age, waging informational warfare is quite easy, and it is quite hard for non-experts to fight back.
By and large, no censorship is needed, because the herds they have had indoctrinational success with–which is 2/3rd’s of the country–simply get their news from places which do not tell stories the power elite do not want told.
This point is missed by many. At issue is not falsehoods told, but truths not told. Even Fox ignores many major stories, like the farcical claim that Obama provided a valid birth certificate. And I continue to wonder how so few are asking hard questions about our apparently on-going support for Islamic “rebels” in Syria with a long history of back stabbing us, and more importantly, what the fuck our actual national interest in Syria is. Should we not back the Russians and Chinese fighting the psychopaths of ISIS? If they want to risk their soldiers and their money, why shouldn’t we let them?
And what sane person could not see the value of national energy independence, or relative independence? None: the people opposing it, opposing things like the Keystone pipeline, are nuts.