Month: October 2013

Read/watch this: http://www.infowars.com/leaked-video-military-police-briefing-with-fema-over-gun-confiscation-and-martial-law/

It appears clear beyond any reasonable doubt that contingency plans have been created based upon Army Field Manual 3.39-40 in which a role for regular military and National Guard units is seen in which they would operate domestically, and under the control of the DHS, which as I have pointed out often has made itself into a paramilitary force.  To be clear, the control is under FEMA, but FEMA is under the DHS umbrella.  My treatment of the manual is here: https://moderatesunitedblog.com//2013/03/open-letter-on-army-fm-339-40.html

As I point out, they are quite clear about the chain of command, and the training being taped at the original link is simply indoctrination.

And we need to recall that all totalitarian regimes have Sondereinsatzgruppen.  The Nazis, for example, used the Waffen SS to commit mass murder behind German lines when they invaded Russia.  The Bolsheviks had the Cheka, which commited all manner of atrocities, but normally in such a way that the public and regular army only suspected them.  They did not know for sure what was going on.

And here, what is being taught is that the military MP’s should just keep their mouths shut and let other people do whatever “is needed”, which in my view plainly includes the extensive use of the camps clearly described in the manual as prison camps, reeducation camps, and as existing in the United States.  As I said, I did a pretty close reading, and excerpted relevant quotes, and there is little ambiguity in them.

When I say senior military leaders in this country need to be mapping out a strategy to counter a coup, I mean many things, but first and foremost logistics.  Obama is the Commander in Chief.  Could he not order all ammunition locked away?  Could he not order all tanks to be mothballed, all jets sequestered or commandeered by his fellow travelers? Our Generals and Admirals need to be alert for signs.  They need to have contingency plans to repel an attempted coup.  They need communications.  What if Obama orders the NSA to jam all signals?  What if they obey?

To the extent America faces an existential threat, this is the most important one, and I would hope our senior leaders are astute enough to grasp this.  Clearly, the pretext for tyranny may be a nuclear detonation of the sort that for a moment seemed planned for South Carolina.  This does not mean that the bomb did not come from anywhere but America.

The numbers of people who would actually be able to contemplate destroying our political system and enslaving Americans cannot be large.  I would have a hard time thinking more than a hundred people know all the details of what is planned.

And this is certainly cause for hope.  Americans are not Russians.  We are not nihilists in large numbers.  We did not just fight a war in which we were slaughtered in huge numbers, futilely, as ordered by an absolute monarch.  Nor can he promise the world as Lenin did and be believed. We are not oppressed by the government in the way, say, Castro was able to claim Cubans were.  There are no French colonialists as there were in Vietnam.  Obama is not a war hero like Mao was.

What works in the favor of true patriots is that Obama and his minions can’t know with certainty what orders will be followed, who is just playing along and will frag their unit the moment they get orders to break the law.

He has no mass mandate for a coup.  He can’t expect even a short holiday of support, like were given Mao, Castro, Giap (or whoever the first leader of the conquered South was) and others.  All of his options, looked at honestly, are bad.  The Fabian strategy was a good one, but the sauce has broken.  Post-Obamacare the Tea Party will do nothing but grow.

One hopes that there exist actually sane people among this group, and that they might come to their senses and alert people openly.  We have done a great deal of good in this country, and around the world, and to state the obvious, mass murder never did anything but cause mass suffering.  There is nothing redemptive in it, nothing positive.

Common sense and common decency.

Add to this: jobs and safety for the poor, opportunity for the middle class, and support for job creators.

My understanding is that Obamacare requires insurers to provide free contraceptives to women who request them, and free abortions on demand.  This alone should make the premiums for women, and families containing women, much higher.  My guess, though, is that these costs are being borne equally by both men and women.

As I point out in my treatise on Obamacare, insurance premiums MUST go up on almost everyone.  Not only is the Medicaid limit being raised up significantly, but subsidies will be paid to people who don’t qualify for Medicaid even under the new standards.  Further, you have minimum deductibles, they have to cover “wellness” visits, etc.

Add on top of this the Obamacare bureaucracy which must be paid for as well.  This will come out of tax revenue, but it will no doubt be costly.  It cost over half a billion dollars to build a website that could have been done in the private sector for $500,000, or 1/1,000th as much, and at that the website DOESN’T WORK.

And I don’t buy the argument that the flaws are intentional.  They know they can’t hide the true premium hikes forever, and certainly not until the next election. I think the contract was given to Michelle Obama’s buddy because they  believe in the spoils system, likely in exchange for favors of some sort, like divulging personal details of political enemies; and her buddy was not equal to the job.  Full stop.  Taxpayer money used to pay bribes to people who should not have won the contract.

Obamacare can only be seen as yet one more way of sucking money out of the productive and funneling it to the unproductive or less productive–income is an accurate measurement of one’s economic usefulness in a free market, which is fair–all in order to get votes.

But I think Obamacare sucks so epically that it is going to FORCE leftists to admit that government is not always the answer, that it can’t reliably be trusted, and that Obama LIED about the outcomes to be expected.

I also think that if Republicans get smart and start courting blacks, we have a historic opportunity to roll back the sustained assault on our liberties and common decency that has been the project of the Left over the last century or so.

As Charles Barkley pointed out: “the poor have been voting Democrat for 50 years and they are still poor.”

This term means roughly “blocked energy”, or “emotional blockage”.  I don’t know what language it is from, but since I came across it in my Kum Nye training, I will guess Tibetan.

As my energy begins to flow better, I am seeing things for the first time.  One thing I see is that the effective use of analytical, intellectual reason is impossible in conditions of blocked energy flow.  There is such a thing as emotional logic, by which I mean that the figurative waters flow in the pathways that are most obvious, and most healthy.  It means you process all emotions, all experience, as it happens, and hold nothing back, lock nothing away.

When you look at someone like Barack Obama, you need to see someone who consists almost entirely of blockages.  He interacts with the world in an entirely emotionally detached way, but this is not the same as a rational way.  He claims to want to improve the world but damages it.  He no doubt believes that he is able to pursue his own self interest in a rational way, but he can’t see what that self interest actually is, what would be best for him emotionally.

Blind to his own emotional needs, he has learned to care little or nothing for the needs of others.  Why is the Obamacare website such a failure?  Because even though he has always intended Obamacare just to be a short stopping point on the way to a complete government take-over of our lives in important ways, a person who liked people would have cared enough not to cause unnecessary hurt in the process.  Bill Clinton would have delivered something that worked, because whatever else he is, Bill Clinton is a people person.

Compare the sexuality of Bill Clinton and Obama.  As far as we can tell there is no sexual chemistry between Michelle and him, and if we are to believe the accounts of at least one homosexual man who claimed to have sex with him, there is or was little chemistry even in his homosexual relationships.  Obama has too many locked away traumas to be emotionally present for anyone for any reason.

In the Eastern model, we are presumed to be born for happiness, and only prevented from it by blindness.  Logically, they offer solutions to being blind.

In the West Positive Psychology is only in its infancy.  Until perhaps a decade or two ago, the focus was on treating human beings like animals, with a focus solely on curing illness, but not on providing meaning or direction for consciousness.  Small wonder there are so many confused people out there.

Here is what I would argue is a useful oversimplification (a term I just invented and like): the talent of men is suppressing experience, and that of women processing it.  Men are physically hard wired to more easily sequester experience, to lock it away.  This is helpful, as one example, in war, where the experiences are completely overwhelming.  I asked a Ranger acquaintance once how he dealt with the death of a man we both knew in an IED explosion, and he said: “I lock it away in a drawer and don’t open it very often.”

Women have vastly more connections between their hemispheres than men do.  This means their experience of life is more unified; they have a harder time not feeling things, not reacting to things.  This is a general statement, but my own observations bear this out.

But I would stipulate that because they are wired this way, women’s potential richness of experience of life is vastly larger than that of most men who do not teach themselves to be integrated.  It is not enough to be fearless: one must feel fear and process it and transcend it into acceptance.

I recently became aware that women can have four kinds of orgasms.  Did you know this?  I have reached middle age and not known this.  They can have clitoral, G-Spot, anal, and squirting orgasms.  They can also have many of them.  One girl on a CD I watched claimed to have had 18 in one session.

I say this not because I am obsessed with these things, but because this is actually very interesting.  The potential richness of a woman’s sexual experience is vastly greater than that of a man, who can have one (and if he is gay, or willing to allow anal sex, two) type, and typically is doing well if he can have two in one session, and great if he can do three.

This got me to wondering if in some ways God gave women more ways to process experience precisely because they have no choice.  My whole inner work right now is learning to open up internal energy flow, and I am wondering if women can get everything I am doing done simply through good sex.

I had more to say, but need to run.

Finally watched this, and was very impressed.  GREAT MOVIE, wonderful acting.

I just hated the end.  It worked out to de facto Communist propaganda.  Communism is inspired by the French Revolution, and the word itself comes from the Paris Commune that if my math was right was roughly 20 years after the barricades in that movie, which would have been from about 1850.

We need to be clear that the Arc de Triomphe is a monument to wars following the French Revolution in which millions of people were killed.  Napoleon did not pay his troops: he allowed them to rape, loot and pillage.  Countless lives were damaged in addition to those lost outright.  As in Communist nations there was a great deal of horror and little to redeem or justify it.

The Eiffel Tower is a monument to the original French Revolution, one which led directly to the Committee of Public Safety (does this not sound a bit like Department of Homeland Security) and, I forget the number, at least tens of thousands of deaths in all sorts of awful ways. In addition to the guillotine I remember reading about people being chained and sunk on boats, and placed in front of cannons and blown to bits.

All of this was always insanity.  None of it ever led to anything that even remotely justified the suffering.  The French Revolution turned virtually the entire nation into Javerts.  If you didn’t wear the right colors or were accused by someone of some crime simply out of spite, you could get summarily executed with nothing even APPROACHING justice. 

That stirring scene with Ann Hathaway, when she realizes all hopes of a better life are gone: this story was reenacted millions of times BECAUSE of the French Revolution.  What happened to the farm wife whose husband was murdered by French Nazis, and who was gang raped, and all her lifestock killed or stolen?  What happened to Russian peasants reduced to cannibalism to survive?  What happened to those who supported the Revolution because they wanted bread, and who like Jean Valjean wound up slaves because they had to steal to survive, because NOTHING worked economically in that Alice in Wonderland world with real axes and real blood?

Those young men, the “idealists”, were weak. They wanted the world to be a certain way, and decided that they did not want to live if the world was not in fact that way.  This is delusional.  It is illness, pathology.

The world is the way it is, and if we want to improve it, we must start by understanding it.  All the wishing in the world will not only not accomplish anything, but if you mistake wishing for reality, it leads to death and suffering which was unnecessary and which would not have happened if you had not happened along with your bad ideas.

We all want passion in life, but I would submit that the modest ones pursued diligently across a life are infinitely more useful than grand ones pursued violently.  There are many ways to commit suicide.

I’ve never liked the term “inner child”.  Children are irresponsible, they whine, and they are not serious.  None of this, of course, is their fault.  We all start as children, and there is no other way to do it.  But I think many people use this phrase as an excuse to act like children as adults.

But there is a part in all of us, I think, which is childlike in important positive ways.  The capacity for wonder arises from this part.  Spontaneous generosity and affection arise from this part.  Curiosity arises from this part.  Happiness and joy arise from this part.  Connection with others on a deep level comes from this part.

I therefore propose the term “Inner Innocent”. Or perhaps “Inner Angel”.  I will likely come up with more terms.

I will add that I recognize that I am an odd mix of tendencies.  One moment I am talking about global tyranny, and the next I am writing things like this.

I forget if it was Christ or one of his disciples that said it, but I have always like the advice to be as innocent as a dove and as cunning as a serpent.  They are not contradictory at all: they merely exist at different levels of a well integrated personality.

Not only is there no need to be stupid to be a good person, it is strongly contraindicated.  There is no value in stupidity or naivete.  People who mean well learn.  This is the sign they actually mean well, and conversely the failure to learn indicates a motivation other than decency.

I read that roughly $1 billion is being wasted daily, diverted from alternative, better uses, in the name of stopping global warming.  This is crazy.

But look at the comments.  People are waking up.  It was not like this five years ago.  The Earth choosing not to indulge the fascists has been mighty inconvenient for them.

I will add that we spend roughly twice that on national defense.  I would like to see that number drop as well.

If we are becoming a banana republic, then we need to start thinking like one.  The rule is that one asshole seizes power, and then the Army overthrows him.  It worked quite well in Chile, which is why everyone still hates Pinochet so much.  He took power, ruled a while, then stepped down peacefully, which is something Hugo Chavez was never going to do.

Here, as long as the Constitution is more or less being respected–which is to say constantly trampled on, but never fully vitiated, and as long as  Congress continues to exert a strong policy influence–we should continue to work politically.  If at any point, though, the rule of law becomes subject to a dictator, if at any point our Constitutional Republic is brought to an end–if at any point Obama or a successor BREAKS THE LAW in patent and on-going ways even worse than what we are seeing today–I would submit that the proper role of our military is to take control, and return the power of the government to the people, and reinstitute a system of law based on the Constitution. Defending the Constitution is, after all, literally their sworn duty.

Being a land of laws is what has made us strong, and part of this premise is that NO ONE is above the law.

In my view, they should have contingency plans for this.

I would add that about the only way my “Capitalist Revolution” is going to happen is in such extreme circumstances.

Actually, I will add one more thing: Obama knows that most members of our military value freedom, and are strong patriots.  They will never willingly be made agents of tyranny.  This means that if he does plan to seize complete power, he will have to have an EXCUSE, one which will make reasonable people follow orders which they ordinarily would reject.  Presumably such an excuse would need to take the form of a false flag terrorist attack purportedly involving a wide conspiracy among precisely the Tea Party sorts Obama hates so much; or a generalized economic disaster, where there is widespread disorder in the streets.

Again, senior leaders need game plans for these situations.  Their JOB, their MISSION, is to protect freedom, not Obama.  Since it takes becoming a political animal to reach those positions, in general, many forget this.  They forget the mission.

Both scenarios, though, could easily be paid for with the tens of billions of dollars that disappeared from the “Stimulus”.

I think I may start using this as a synonym for “leftist” and Fascist.

It can be stated as a general rule that whatever word an anti-Liberal uses, the opposite is most likely the case.  The stated intent of Obamacare was to increase coverage and decrease costs, both for individuals and in terms of what the government was paying out.